For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
dcbaQuote
Mathijs
from 1988 until about 1992 Guns were far bigger than the Stones.
Mathijs
Are you sure the 91-92 UYI tour sold more tickets than the SW/UJ tour? Are you sure G&R played bigger places and booked more shows than the Stones? I'm not too sure of this.
Take L.A. : the Stones sold out the Coliseum four times in 1989. G&R sold out the much smaller Forum four times too. 80000 x4 vs 17000 x 4.
Who's the winner?
Sure G&R got more press than the Stones but it wasn't exactly for musical reasons. It was more like "G&r axeman pisses in the aisle of a commercial flight" or "G&r singer punches David Bowie".
Quote
Rocky DijonQuote
strat72Quote
Mathijs
And to contrary believe, Guns never opened for the Stones in LA 1989, they were on the same bill.
Mathijs
Nonsense...... They were Stones shows and GNR played first. Therefore they were the support act.
Living Colour opened, then GNR, then the Stones.
[www.pinterest.com]
Quote
Kurt
In all fairness, the ONLY reason The Stones sold out four nights at the Coliseum is BECAUSE of Guns N' Roses.
Quote
KurtQuote
dcbaQuote
Mathijs
from 1988 until about 1992 Guns were far bigger than the Stones.
Mathijs
Are you sure the 91-92 UYI tour sold more tickets than the SW/UJ tour? Are you sure G&R played bigger places and booked more shows than the Stones? I'm not too sure of this.
Take L.A. : the Stones sold out the Coliseum four times in 1989. G&R sold out the much smaller Forum four times too. 80000 x4 vs 17000 x 4.
Who's the winner?
Sure G&R got more press than the Stones but it wasn't exactly for musical reasons. It was more like "G&r axeman pisses in the aisle of a commercial flight" or "G&r singer punches David Bowie".
In all fairness, the ONLY reason The Stones sold out four nights at the Coliseum is BECAUSE of Guns N' Roses.
My ticket signed by Steven Adler.
Quote
DandelionPowderman
GNR would have been better off with staying in arenas. They never had the format required to do the huge stadium show, and everything that comes along with that.
That's more a praise than criticism, though. I really wish I had caught their show in 1988 instead of in 1993. The show I went to was dead, totally burned out energy-wise.
However, money talks...
Quote
strat72
Really? How The Stones managed to sell out five nights in London, six in New York, and nine in Tokyo without GNR as their support act is beyond me. Silly boy......
Nice ticket though, and shame Adler isn't their drummer now, alongside Izzy on guiter. As Izzy said though..... "They didn't want to split the cash".
Quote
FrogSugar
£5 million for one gig, nice...
Quote
FrogSugar
£5 million for one gig, nice... Ok, I guess I understand now why they play so long...it's a great way to force promoters to pay more! (as a fan, I'd rather they trim some of those covers off!)
[www.blabbermouth.net]
Quote
FrogSugar
£5 million for one gig, nice... Ok, I guess I understand now why they play so long...it's a great way to force promoters to pay more! (as a fan, I'd rather they trim some of those covers off!)
[www.blabbermouth.net]
Quote
dcba
"Report: SLASH Agrees To Pay Estranged Wife Over $6.6 Million"
[www.blabbermouth.net]
So all in all... Play 3 stadium gigs, pay the ex-wife the ransom and you're free to start anew.
The untold word about the G&R reformation was that Axl was broke and Slash needed some fresh dough for his divorce.
Quote
gotdablouse
they couldn't even give the guy who wrote their best music (and gave them a carreer) a spot!
Quote
gotdablouse
Didn't know that about their beginnings in LA, interestingly Axl couldn't stop ridiculing Izzy because he wanted to go back to Indiana after they hit pay dirt, "imagine, his ambition is to back to friggin' Indianapolis"...without Izzy where would they be ? On the other hand it has to be said that apart from a couple of ideas on JuJu Hounds, Izzy hasn't been able to come with a single song of interest since he left the band, so strange !
Anyway these guys have become a complete joke on so many levels that I'm at a loss as to how they've been able to walk all the way to the bank for the past two years, goes to show the average "level" of the audiences that fill up stadiums ;-)
Quote
dcbaQuote
gotdablouse
they couldn't even give the guy who wrote their best music (and gave them a carreer) a spot!
Imho Axl and Slash both hate Izzy Stradlin.
Axl has always been jealous of Izzy's coolness and determination. As soon as he graduated from school Izzy split from Indiana and headed to L.A. where he immediately blended in the musical scene.
Axl followed path, went to L.A. and... stuck to Izzy like a parasite.
Slash hated Izzy, wanted him out of the band as soon as G&R was formed. His idea was G&R was to be a "Led Zep like" band = a band with a single guitarist.
Slash also held a grudge for the way Stradlin beheaved during the UYI sessions : he rarely came into the studio, recorded his parts in one take, and sent riff ideas by mail on cassettes.
Stradlin was trying to stay away from the temptation of drug relapse. He also was probably foreseeing that after the firing of Adler the true G&R band was dead.
Quote
dcbaQuote
gotdablouse
they couldn't even give the guy who wrote their best music (and gave them a carreer) a spot!
Imho Axl and Slash both hate Izzy Stradlin.
Axl has always been jealous of Izzy's coolness and determination. As soon as he graduated from school Izzy split from Indiana and headed to L.A. where he immediately blended in the musical scene.
Axl followed path, went to L.A. and... stuck to Izzy like a parasite.
Slash hated Izzy, wanted him out of the band as soon as G&R was formed. His idea was G&R was to be a "Led Zep like" band = a band with a single guitarist.
Slash also held a grudge for the way Stradlin beheaved during the UYI sessions : he rarely came into the studio, recorded his parts in one take, and sent riff ideas by mail on cassettes.
Stradlin was trying to stay away from the temptation of drug relapse. He also was probably foreseeing that after the firing of Adler the true G&R band was dead.
That's an arrogant thing to say. I went to see them last year because I wanted to cross them off my list having been too young to see them in 1992-'93. I wasn't hoodwinked...I knew exactly what version of the band I was getting. They sounded great and delivered for over 3 hours.Quote
gotdablouse
Didn't know that about their beginnings in LA, interestingly Axl couldn't stop ridiculing Izzy because he wanted to go back to Indiana after they hit pay dirt, "imagine, his ambition is to back to friggin' Indianapolis"...without Izzy where would they be ? On the other hand it has to be said that apart from a couple of ideas on JuJu Hounds, Izzy hasn't been able to come with a single song of interest since he left the band, so strange !
Anyway these guys have become a complete joke on so many levels that I'm at a loss as to how they've been able to walk all the way to the bank for the past two years, goes to show the average "level" of the audiences that fill up stadiums ;-)
Quote
gotdablouse
I was happy to see them in 1992 and drove 3 hours to buy UYI on their release date but I'd need to be paid to go see them these days. A complete travesty and parody of what they once were. Axl and Slash are horible to look at and Axl sounds horrible. They have no shame (Axl said Slash was a "cancer" at one point right?) and THEY are only really doing it for the money, to the point where they couldn't even give the guy who wrote their best music (and gave them a carreer) a spot!
Quote
strat72
As soon as I heard Izzy and Adler were not involved I knew this comeback was 95% about cash, and that's when I decided to give it a miss. When a band does a tour for mostly nothing more than money, it's not gonna go well, and judging by the comments from people I know who went to both Berlin and Donnington, it's a tragic parody of what was once a good band.
Shame......
Quote
RollingFreak
I truly think they would have. I get Duff's appeal, and being able to say 3 key members is better than two, and Duff is recognizable with the long hair and stuff (and as my friend said who became a fan during UYI "the band to me has always been Axl, Slash and Duff. That was who was on that tour."). Although there's a hilarious video where it was a guy asking people in the parking lot who the 3 people are and NO ONE knew Duff. The reunion would have been FINE without Axl and Slash and I truly don't think 80% of the general public know or care who Duff is. They want those two and thats it. But like you say, it lends more legitimacy, I think even moreso to hardcores than casuals. Casuals are going as long as Slash is there.
For Duff's presence and work over the years, and for bringing this reunion even to the table and setting it up, he deserves that money. I think, for the music they are playing and living off of every night mostly written by Izzy, Izzy deserves the same. They do different things but have both contributed massively in that second tier under Axl and Slash. You pay Izzy what you pay Duff or you do what Izzy did and say piss off, at least IMO. People then argue Izzy only wants money. Well yeah, but the reason he's not there is because Axl and Slash wouldn't accept LESS! Izzy deserves fair compensation for the music they are playing every night even though I will agree and wouldn't argue for a second anyone can do his job and most people don't care.
Quote
DanQuote
RollingFreak
I truly think they would have. I get Duff's appeal, and being able to say 3 key members is better than two, and Duff is recognizable with the long hair and stuff (and as my friend said who became a fan during UYI "the band to me has always been Axl, Slash and Duff. That was who was on that tour."). Although there's a hilarious video where it was a guy asking people in the parking lot who the 3 people are and NO ONE knew Duff. The reunion would have been FINE without Axl and Slash and I truly don't think 80% of the general public know or care who Duff is. They want those two and thats it. But like you say, it lends more legitimacy, I think even moreso to hardcores than casuals. Casuals are going as long as Slash is there.
For Duff's presence and work over the years, and for bringing this reunion even to the table and setting it up, he deserves that money. I think, for the music they are playing and living off of every night mostly written by Izzy, Izzy deserves the same. They do different things but have both contributed massively in that second tier under Axl and Slash. You pay Izzy what you pay Duff or you do what Izzy did and say piss off, at least IMO. People then argue Izzy only wants money. Well yeah, but the reason he's not there is because Axl and Slash wouldn't accept LESS! Izzy deserves fair compensation for the music they are playing every night even though I will agree and wouldn't argue for a second anyone can do his job and most people don't care.
I will go one further and say all you need for a reunion is Axl and the hat. That hat is selling most of the tickets.