Tell Me :  Talk
Talk about your favorite band. 

Previous page Next page First page IORR home

For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.

Goto Page: Previous12345Next
Current Page: 2 of 5
Re: OT: Veteran rockers don´t deliver according to their former heights, why?
Posted by: RollingFreak ()
Date: April 1, 2017 01:08

Quote
mtaylor
Just saw Eric Clapton in MSG this month and he has changed to a more comfortable style. He cannot pull off the same kind of lead solos as he did just 10 years ago and his voice isn't as flexible as it used to be .. the age factor.

Has it changed really that much from 10 years ago? I saw him with Cream whenever that was and I don't see why he couldn't still do all that today. He wasn't very energitic or anything. My feeling with Clapton has always been he can turn it on when he wants, but usually coasts, which is more than fine because his coasting is better than most. But I didn't really see anything inspired when I saw him with Cream, and I wonder is it possible he's even less so now? I'd just assume its about the same, and just the really fiery playing comes a bit less frequently. Maybe I'm way off.

Re: OT: Veteran rockers don´t deliver according to their former heights, why?
Posted by: shortfatfanny ()
Date: April 1, 2017 01:12

Quote
dcba
Quote
schillid
Zappa

Zappa the tight-arsed dude who never came up with a piece of music worth remembering?
Zappa the guy who in the 80's worked closely with the FBI to find the perpetrator of a bootleg boxset of live tapes. A bootleg boxset which was said to be better than the official "You Can't Do That Onstage" series...

Frank should have lit up a fat one!

The torture never stops


Re: OT: Veteran rockers don´t deliver according to their former heights, why?
Posted by: Hairball ()
Date: April 1, 2017 01:37

Quote
stone4ever
It must be one of the mysteries of the world, why do people , musicians loose their creativity. Writers don't, they can go on into their 70's delivering some of their best work. Personally where music is concerned i put it down to musicians either stopping drugs or the drugs stop working. Most of the best stuff comes from the 60's and 70's when people were experimenting with all kinds of mind expanding drugs. I actually wonder if drugs are just shit these days lol. Keith said in 98' he tried Heroin again and it just didn't work for him like it used to, he said he thought drugs were lousy these days, who knows.
The other consideration is when people mature and become relaxed in their own skin, they seem to lose something creatively, when people are falling in and out of love when they are younger it seems to inspire creativity. Being married with three children in a stable relationship seems to diminish the insecurity which can sometimes drive people to do amazing things. Also proving ones self, ones hunger for stardom and all the goodies that come with it are no longer desired when fame is achieved. Sorry i'm rambling now.

Also, many visual artists throughout history have continued to create great work during their 'Golden' years, and sometimes it's considered their best work.

_____________________________________________________________
Rip this joint, gonna save your soul, round and round and round we go......

Re: OT: Veteran rockers don´t deliver according to their former heights, why?
Posted by: Maindefender ()
Date: April 1, 2017 01:48

Quote
RollingFreak
Quote
mtaylor
Just saw Eric Clapton in MSG this month and he has changed to a more comfortable style. He cannot pull off the same kind of lead solos as he did just 10 years ago and his voice isn't as flexible as it used to be .. the age factor.

Has it changed really that much from 10 years ago? I saw him with Cream whenever that was and I don't see why he couldn't still do all that today. He wasn't very energitic or anything. My feeling with Clapton has always been he can turn it on when he wants, but usually coasts, which is more than fine because his coasting is better than most. But I didn't really see anything inspired when I saw him with Cream, and I wonder is it possible he's even less so now? I'd just assume its about the same, and just the really fiery playing comes a bit less frequently. Maybe I'm way off.

Saw him in '79 or '80, wasn't tearing it up then either

Re: OT: Veteran rockers don´t deliver according to their former heights, why?
Posted by: DaveG ()
Date: April 1, 2017 02:11

Quote
RollingFreak
Quote
mtaylor
Just saw Eric Clapton in MSG this month and he has changed to a more comfortable style. He cannot pull off the same kind of lead solos as he did just 10 years ago and his voice isn't as flexible as it used to be .. the age factor.

Has it changed really that much from 10 years ago? I saw him with Cream whenever that was and I don't see why he couldn't still do all that today. He wasn't very energitic or anything. My feeling with Clapton has always been he can turn it on when he wants, but usually coasts, which is more than fine because his coasting is better than most. But I didn't really see anything inspired when I saw him with Cream, and I wonder is it possible he's even less so now? I'd just assume its about the same, and just the really fiery playing comes a bit less frequently. Maybe I'm way off.

RF, is it safe to assume that you're referring to Cream, Pt. 2, about 10 years ago? To say that he wasn't inspired with Cream back in '66-'68 would be ludicrous. He and Jack Bruce were on fire back then, especially in concert.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2017-04-01 04:04 by DaveG.

Re: OT: Veteran rockers don´t deliver according to their former heights, why?
Posted by: mandu ()
Date: April 1, 2017 03:30

Iggy Pop is still creative

Feel The Fear
And Do It Anyway

Re: OT: Veteran rockers don´t deliver according to their former heights, why?
Posted by: backstreetboy1 ()
Date: April 1, 2017 04:08

there last record,2013..now what,there best album ever....hard to believe but as good as machine head.

Re: OT: Veteran rockers don´t deliver according to their former heights, why?
Date: April 1, 2017 10:27

That's a very hard question. I do believe that it is up to the artist. Yes there is the passing of time, which delivers little gifts like becoming more forgetful e.g., but ultimately you got these guys who hang on to this iron integrity; who realize time is trying to sap them, and who make a point to stay ahead.
Take Neil Young, Nick Cave, Tom Waits, Ian Hunter - all guys at well advanced age. Maybe even Springsteen. And all artists who have reached supreme heights of success and stardom. They continue to release if not always topnotch albums - then at least one always gets the sense that they are trying. That they constantly try to challenge themselves, and don't let it go to the trappings of money, comfort and ritual.

Re: OT: Veteran rockers don´t deliver according to their former heights, why?
Posted by: HMS ()
Date: April 1, 2017 14:14

I cannot listen to Nick Cave, Ian Hunter & Tom Waits. Springsteen´s last good album was released in 1987.

Iggy Pop not reaching former hights? This guy never reached any "hight". His music was always poor.

I know it´s sacrilege but Bowie´s last two albums after his 10-years hiatus were the lousiest albums in his career. Blackstar most of all, it has two ok songs, the rest is pure cacophony.

Getting older, leading a stable life and stop doing drugs kills Rock n Roll. But it keeps the musicians alive at least. Although they bore us to death like Clapton does. David Gilmour & Mark Knopfler too. Dylan is making bad jokes in a row instead of a decent album... what a drag it is getting old for Rock n Rollers.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2017-04-01 14:18 by HMS.

Re: OT: Veteran rockers don´t deliver according to their former heights, why?
Posted by: noughties ()
Date: April 1, 2017 14:40

Quote
backstreetboy1
there last record,2013..now what,there best album ever....hard to believe but as good as machine head.

Hmm, I disagree. "Now What" was a little too colourful for it´s own good. A bit too modern times (Weirdistan and Out of Hand), a bit too A4 rock and roll (Hell to Pay), a bit too 80s Gillan solo ( Body Line), and a bit too rock opera (Vincent Price).

What they should do is to narrow their scope, give themselves a little less freedom and churn out some unmistakeble cool riffs with a hard beat and a memorable melody in the early 70s way, blues based.

Re: OT: Veteran rockers don´t deliver according to their former heights, why?
Posted by: MileHigh ()
Date: April 1, 2017 17:26

There is some MSN clickbait today, pictures of Eric Clapton in LAX being moved in a wheelchair. Apparently he had a severe bout of bronchitis. He looked very frail and old in the pictures.

Re: OT: Veteran rockers don´t deliver according to their former heights, why?
Date: April 1, 2017 18:33

Quote
HMS
I cannot listen to Nick Cave, Ian Hunter & Tom Waits. Springsteen´s last good album was released in 1987.

Iggy Pop not reaching former hights? This guy never reached any "hight". His music was always poor.

I know it´s sacrilege but Bowie´s last two albums after his 10-years hiatus were the lousiest albums in his career. Blackstar most of all, it has two ok songs, the rest is pure cacophony.

Getting older, leading a stable life and stop doing drugs kills Rock n Roll. But it keeps the musicians alive at least. Although they bore us to death like Clapton does. David Gilmour & Mark Knopfler too. Dylan is making bad jokes in a row instead of a decent album... what a drag it is getting old for Rock n Rollers.

I agree 100% with your last paragraph. And it kind of makes my point about the artists who you negate in your first line. It isn't even about liking these guys ( I happen to like them all), just about keeping the pedal down. They get the points.

Re: OT: Veteran rockers don´t deliver according to their former heights, why?
Posted by: LongBeachArena72 ()
Date: April 1, 2017 19:38

Great artists redefine themselves. They continually refocus the discussion of their work and refuse to allow themselves to be evaluated in terms of their pasts.

The Rolling Stones, like most pop stars, are not great artists. In their youth, they possessed a remarkable artistry and produced some songs which may indeed survive the test of time and pass into posterity as part of the "canon." But they did not take sufficiently seriously their "gifts," and they did not commit to a life of constant redevelopment. Like many people who are successful in art, or music, or literature, they allowed themselves to become prisoners of their past. Their unwillingness to go further, to dig deeper, to question everything, to lay bare their souls, if you will, consigned them to that weird hellishness of "the Vegas years." They will do down in history as human jukeboxes who for the final 4 decades of their careers essentially recycled the products of the first decade of their career, with ever decreasing quality, but to ever increasing $$$.

Dylan understood that he could not write "Highway 61 Revisited" indefinitely and so he "pivoted" and produced "Not Dark Yet," and "Mississippi" and "Thunder on the Mountain," and "Early Roman Kings." Bowie knew he would never produce another Ziggy Stardust and so with uncompromising fury and a refusal to allow himself to be judged commercially, he wrote "Slip Away," and "Heathen," and "The Next Day," and "Heat," and "Blackstar," and "Lazarus." Dylan and Bowie moved the goalposts, in other words ... in fact, they obliterated the goal posts entirely, so that it was absurd to try to evaluate their "mature" work solely in the context of what they had produced as young men.

We all change and grow and atrophy and bloom as we age. Great artists make these facts the cornerstone of their work as they grow older. Lesser artists are doomed to simply repeat over and over again the products of their glory years until, at least from an artistic point of view, they become irrelevant.

Re: OT: Veteran rockers don´t deliver according to their former heights, why?
Posted by: Hairball ()
Date: April 1, 2017 20:31

Quote
MileHigh
There is some MSN clickbait today, pictures of Eric Clapton in LAX being moved in a wheelchair. Apparently he had a severe bout of bronchitis. He looked very frail and old in the pictures.

This story was on many news sites a couple days ago.
Here's a link with video - Eric doesn't look 100%, but he's smiling at times while being wheelchaired around LAX.

Clapton Spotted At LAX

_____________________________________________________________
Rip this joint, gonna save your soul, round and round and round we go......

Re: OT: Veteran rockers don´t deliver according to their former heights, why?
Posted by: wonderboy ()
Date: April 1, 2017 21:02

The Stones had a few years in which they were great artists (Keith, especially, and I'm sorry if that makes me a Keith-ette, or maybe they were just artists when their talents combined) but at any rate like LongBeach says, they didn't take care of their talent and expand their horizons.
Whatever Keith might say, JJF doesn't take on a life of its own every night. After a while it's just the same.
Oh, sometimes they would try, they would gather in one spot and make a new album, but ultimately they didn't take the risks necessary to grow as a band. When they added Mick Taylor, they put musicianship first, but when they replaced him, they took an easy way out. Good for them, Ronnie was good company and played his role and helped the brand, but it wasn't done for art's sake.

Re: OT: Veteran rockers don´t deliver according to their former heights, why?
Posted by: stone4ever ()
Date: April 1, 2017 21:36

Quote
Hairball
Quote
MileHigh
There is some MSN clickbait today, pictures of Eric Clapton in LAX being moved in a wheelchair. Apparently he had a severe bout of bronchitis. He looked very frail and old in the pictures.

This story was on many news sites a couple days ago.
Here's a link with video - Eric doesn't look 100%, but he's smiling at times while being wheelchaired around LAX.

Clapton Spotted At LAX


That was very sad, our heroes are getting to that age now, this brought a lump to my throat, hope Eric gets well soon.

Re: OT: Veteran rockers don´t deliver according to their former heights, why?
Date: April 2, 2017 02:36

Quote
LongBeachArena72
Great artists redefine themselves. They continually refocus the discussion of their work and refuse to allow themselves to be evaluated in terms of their pasts.

The Rolling Stones, like most pop stars, are not great artists. In their youth, they possessed a remarkable artistry and produced some songs which may indeed survive the test of time and pass into posterity as part of the "canon." But they did not take sufficiently seriously their "gifts," and they did not commit to a life of constant redevelopment. Like many people who are successful in art, or music, or literature, they allowed themselves to become prisoners of their past. Their unwillingness to go further, to dig deeper, to question everything, to lay bare their souls, if you will, consigned them to that weird hellishness of "the Vegas years." They will do down in history as human jukeboxes who for the final 4 decades of their careers essentially recycled the products of the first decade of their career, with ever decreasing quality, but to ever increasing $$$.

Dylan understood that he could not write "Highway 61 Revisited" indefinitely and so he "pivoted" and produced "Not Dark Yet," and "Mississippi" and "Thunder on the Mountain," and "Early Roman Kings." Bowie knew he would never produce another Ziggy Stardust and so with uncompromising fury and a refusal to allow himself to be judged commercially, he wrote "Slip Away," and "Heathen," and "The Next Day," and "Heat," and "Blackstar," and "Lazarus." Dylan and Bowie moved the goalposts, in other words ... in fact, they obliterated the goal posts entirely, so that it was absurd to try to evaluate their "mature" work solely in the context of what they had produced as young men.

We all change and grow and atrophy and bloom as we age. Great artists make these facts the cornerstone of their work as they grow older. Lesser artists are doomed to simply repeat over and over again the products of their glory years until, at least from an artistic point of view, they become irrelevant.
You say it more eloquently than me.

Re: OT: Veteran rockers don´t deliver according to their former heights, why?
Posted by: mtaylor ()
Date: April 2, 2017 02:49

Quote
Palace Revolution 2000
Quote
HMS
I cannot listen to Nick Cave, Ian Hunter & Tom Waits. Springsteen´s last good album was released in 1987.

Iggy Pop not reaching former hights? This guy never reached any "hight". His music was always poor.

I know it´s sacrilege but Bowie´s last two albums after his 10-years hiatus were the lousiest albums in his career. Blackstar most of all, it has two ok songs, the rest is pure cacophony.

Getting older, leading a stable life and stop doing drugs kills Rock n Roll. But it keeps the musicians alive at least. Although they bore us to death like Clapton does. David Gilmour & Mark Knopfler too. Dylan is making bad jokes in a row instead of a decent album... what a drag it is getting old for Rock n Rollers.

I agree 100% with your last paragraph. And it kind of makes my point about the artists who you negate in your first line. It isn't even about liking these guys ( I happen to like them all), just about keeping the pedal down. They get the points.
Then listen to Taylor Swift or Justin Bieber if that is fantastic.

Re: OT: Veteran rockers don´t deliver according to their former heights, why?
Posted by: dmay ()
Date: April 2, 2017 03:40

Hmmm...simple to say the baggage and ravages of life get in the way of creativity...but regarding same...No one can recapture their youth. So, you can figure out how to make your music relevant to where you are now in life - what's come, passed, might be - and make your mark without thought as to how it will be received or sell. There aren't many artists of my generation, outside of Neil Young, Dylan in his own weird way, who've chosen to try and make their mark. Commerce rules.

Re: OT: Veteran rockers don´t deliver according to their former heights, why?
Posted by: Long John Stoner ()
Date: April 2, 2017 06:20

Quote
LongBeachArena72
Great artists redefine themselves. They continually refocus the discussion of their work and refuse to allow themselves to be evaluated in terms of their pasts.

The Rolling Stones, like most pop stars, are not great artists. In their youth, they possessed a remarkable artistry and produced some songs which may indeed survive the test of time and pass into posterity as part of the "canon." But they did not take sufficiently seriously their "gifts," and they did not commit to a life of constant redevelopment. Like many people who are successful in art, or music, or literature, they allowed themselves to become prisoners of their past. Their unwillingness to go further, to dig deeper, to question everything, to lay bare their souls, if you will, consigned them to that weird hellishness of "the Vegas years." They will do down in history as human jukeboxes who for the final 4 decades of their careers essentially recycled the products of the first decade of their career, with ever decreasing quality, but to ever increasing $$$.

Dylan understood that he could not write "Highway 61 Revisited" indefinitely and so he "pivoted" and produced "Not Dark Yet," and "Mississippi" and "Thunder on the Mountain," and "Early Roman Kings." Bowie knew he would never produce another Ziggy Stardust and so with uncompromising fury and a refusal to allow himself to be judged commercially, he wrote "Slip Away," and "Heathen," and "The Next Day," and "Heat," and "Blackstar," and "Lazarus." Dylan and Bowie moved the goalposts, in other words ... in fact, they obliterated the goal posts entirely, so that it was absurd to try to evaluate their "mature" work solely in the context of what they had produced as young men.

We all change and grow and atrophy and bloom as we age. Great artists make these facts the cornerstone of their work as they grow older. Lesser artists are doomed to simply repeat over and over again the products of their glory years until, at least from an artistic point of view, they become irrelevant.

I would add McCartney to your list as well. Post Beatles, he indeed sputtered at times but has challenged himself as he's gotten older, as evidenced by his classical works and his electronic forays (i.e. Fireman).

Re: OT: Veteran rockers don´t deliver according to their former heights, why?
Posted by: Rockman ()
Date: April 2, 2017 06:29

....show us what ya got ......



ROCKMAN

Re: OT: Veteran rockers don´t deliver according to their former heights, why?
Posted by: Koen ()
Date: April 2, 2017 06:40

Short people got no reason...

Re: OT: Veteran rockers don´t deliver according to their former heights, why?
Posted by: Rockman ()
Date: April 2, 2017 06:43

.... Ya know any pigmy rock bands Koen????...



ROCKMAN

Re: OT: Veteran rockers don´t deliver according to their former heights, why?
Posted by: 35love ()
Date: April 2, 2017 07:27

stone4ever when you mentioned you thought Keith has stated 'drugs are lousy these days'
Keith said that in context to pharmaceutical prescription pills.
Don't know why I feel compelled to correct that, but I distinctly remember how he said it/ I agree.
Also, whenever there is a 'they are old' thread,
SO ARE WE.

Re: OT: Veteran rockers don´t deliver according to their former heights, why?
Posted by: stone4ever ()
Date: April 2, 2017 10:30

Quote
35love
stone4ever when you mentioned you thought Keith has stated 'drugs are lousy these days'
Keith said that in context to pharmaceutical prescription pills.
Don't know why I feel compelled to correct that, but I distinctly remember how he said it/ I agree.
Also, whenever there is a 'they are old' thread,
SO ARE WE.

Sorry 35Love but he absolutely wasn't referring to prescription drugs when he made the reference to drugs these days. It was at the time he admitted to dabbling with heroin again back in 97' or 98'. I can't remember what article i was reading or exactly what year he said it but he was referring to class A drugs.
Perhaps he has referred to prescription drugs at another time in another interview, i seem to remember that also. That is what you are remembering.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2017-04-02 10:32 by stone4ever.

Re: OT: Veteran rockers don´t deliver according to their former heights, why?
Posted by: jlowe ()
Date: April 2, 2017 11:07

Quote
Hairball
Quote
MileHigh
There is some MSN clickbait today, pictures of Eric Clapton in LAX being moved in a wheelchair. Apparently he had a severe bout of bronchitis. He looked very frail and old in the pictures.

This story was on many news sites a couple days ago.
Here's a link with video - Eric doesn't look 100%, but he's smiling at times while being wheelchaired around LAX.

Clapton Spotted At LAX

He actually seems to be smiling more than he does during his concerts!
Does the Airport not have a VIP facility?
Shouldn't his children be at school?
Glad to see the cancelled concerts have been rearranged so soon, however.

Re: OT: Veteran rockers don´t deliver according to their former heights, why?
Date: April 2, 2017 14:05

Quote
dcba
Quote
schillid
Zappa

Zappa the tight-arsed dude who never came up with a piece of music worth remembering?
Zappa the guy who in the 80's worked closely with the FBI to find the perpetrator of a bootleg boxset of live tapes. A bootleg boxset which was said to be better than the official "You Can't Do That Onstage" series...

Frank should have lit up a fat one!

eye rolling smiley

Re: OT: Veteran rockers don´t deliver according to their former heights, why?
Posted by: crholmstrom ()
Date: April 2, 2017 14:12

Quote
RollingFreak
Quote
keefriff99
That's why I respect Robert Plant...that guy truly does what he wants, and it shows...even if you don't dig his softer sound, it's awesome that he refuses to pretend it's still 1977.

Agreed. He may go out and play mostly Zep stuff live, but the man won a Grammy for his Allison Krauss album then turned down a Zep reunion to do another one of those in 2008. May not be my bag, but he's doing his own thing, at least studio wise, and I'm sure he's more fulfilled than most rockers his age doing stuff he actually cares about and is new and fresh.

& he radically reworks the zep stuff he performs. Definitely not just looking for a payday. I got to meet him once. Very nice man.

Re: OT: Veteran rockers don´t deliver according to their former heights, why?
Posted by: HonkeyTonkFlash ()
Date: April 3, 2017 01:44

No artist's period of peak brilliance can be duplicated or go on forever. The Who will never make another Who's Next. The Stones will never make another Exile. Doesn't mean they can't still make some enjoyable music but the stratospheric peaks have a certain season.

"Gonna find my way to heaven ..."

Re: OT: Veteran rockers don´t deliver according to their former heights, why?
Posted by: angee ()
Date: April 3, 2017 02:56

I can't think of any rocker who wrote his best work toward the end of his career or life, assuming he/she didn't die very young. Can anyone?

Yes, keeping fresh is nice, in concert as well as recording. Are many of us perhaps just disappointing that there is no album of originals from the RS? (I can hear Mick now, no, we can't put this stuff out. They'll just trash the lot.)

I still say, yet again, that it is unfair to compare a solo act, an artist with complete control, to a band with more than one controlling force or at least members whose needs must be considered.

~"Love is Strong"~

Goto Page: Previous12345Next
Current Page: 2 of 5


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Online Users

Guests: 1420
Record Number of Users: 206 on June 1, 2022 23:50
Record Number of Guests: 9627 on January 2, 2024 23:10

Previous page Next page First page IORR home