Re: Infamy
Posted by:
retired_dog
()
Date: August 31, 2005 01:28
wild_horse_pete Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> retired_dog
> said..............................................
> ......
>
> It has everything? Now THAT needs to be explained.
> It has NOTHING. Just sounds like some stuff any
> idiot amateur band from the neighborhood can do
> without too much effort. You are carried away just
> because it's labelled "Keith Richards".
>
> Need to be explained???
> I just said it.It has a great funky tune, a blues
> harp,
Oh, great. If you hear a great funky tune, fine with me. Are you on meds ? Just asking.
> and you have to listen between the lines!
I never listen to music between the lines, mate! Again: Are you on meds?
(Honestly: When the music sucks, the lyrics between the lines do not interest me that much)
> And i`m not carried away, i`m just glad that he
> make a song like this, not a ballad or something
> wich we get for almost 15 years or so, the guy
> will never make a song like happy or t&a (no
> not you bastard LOL), because that days are over
> for him.
It's a pity when the good days are really over for him. And, just because Infamy is different does not make it any good for me.
> You are carried away with TPIE, that`s a song i
> allready heard ten times from him.
Does this fact make TPIE a bad song ? And does this fact make Infamy any good ?