For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
whitem8
A great album with a lot of variety, and two epic stones jams, Time Waits for No One and Fingerprint File. Great album with a funk/rock feel to it. The only song that doesn't do much for me is Luxury.
Quote
Blueranger
The first time they played it safe all over.
Not one single note on the album points forward.
There are decent songs, but they are alarmingly uneven and this is were they took it one step further in creating 'Stones-by-numbers' tracks - something that started on Goats Head Soup. On this record, if was the first time (but not the last) on which started to sound like a copy of themselves on certain tracks.
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
Blueranger
The first time they played it safe all over.
Not one single note on the album points forward.
There are decent songs, but they are alarmingly uneven and this is were they took it one step further in creating 'Stones-by-numbers' tracks - something that started on Goats Head Soup. On this record, if was the first time (but not the last) on which started to sound like a copy of themselves on certain tracks.
Good description, although Luxury pointed forward to what would come on their next album.
Quote
Turner68Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
Blueranger
The first time they played it safe all over.
Not one single note on the album points forward.
There are decent songs, but they are alarmingly uneven and this is were they took it one step further in creating 'Stones-by-numbers' tracks - something that started on Goats Head Soup. On this record, if was the first time (but not the last) on which started to sound like a copy of themselves on certain tracks.
Good description, although Luxury pointed forward to what would come on their next album.
by which i assume you mean really half-baked attempts at doing for reggae what they did for the blues... ;-)
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
Turner68Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
Blueranger
The first time they played it safe all over.
Not one single note on the album points forward.
There are decent songs, but they are alarmingly uneven and this is were they took it one step further in creating 'Stones-by-numbers' tracks - something that started on Goats Head Soup. On this record, if was the first time (but not the last) on which started to sound like a copy of themselves on certain tracks.
Good description, although Luxury pointed forward to what would come on their next album.
by which i assume you mean really half-baked attempts at doing for reggae what they did for the blues... ;-)
Well, they did I Got A Letter, a pure reggae original with Keith on vocals that didn't make it to GHS or IORR. I think mixing in a rock sound in Luxury was something they did because they weren't confident enough to do a full blown reggae back then.
I'm one of the few who really enjoy Cherry Oh Baby, though, and Ronnie's entrance gave them a more Caribbean/Funky sound on BAB. Hey Negrita proves that.
So, yeah, Luxury was pointing forward, although they started playing reggae in 1972 already.
Quote
DandelionPowderman
Well, they did I Got A Letter, a pure reggae original with Keith on vocals that didn't make it to GHS or IORR. I think mixing in a rock sound in Luxury was something they did because they weren't confident enough to do a full blown reggae back then.
I'm one of the few who really enjoy Cherry Oh Baby, though, and Ronnie's entrance gave them a more Caribbean/Funky sound on BAB. Hey Negrita proves that.
So, yeah, Luxury was pointing forward, although they started playing reggae in 1972 already.
Quote
NaturalustQuote
DandelionPowderman
Well, they did I Got A Letter, a pure reggae original with Keith on vocals that didn't make it to GHS or IORR. I think mixing in a rock sound in Luxury was something they did because they weren't confident enough to do a full blown reggae back then.
I'm one of the few who really enjoy Cherry Oh Baby, though, and Ronnie's entrance gave them a more Caribbean/Funky sound on BAB. Hey Negrita proves that.
So, yeah, Luxury was pointing forward, although they started playing reggae in 1972 already.
That's pretty funny. I can just imagine them making that decision. lol
I don't think the Stones have ever done any particularly authentic sounding reggae tunes till they covered Get Up Stand Up. Yes I Got A Letter was close but not completely pure reggae, imo.
Quote
Naturalust
An obvious attempt to be pure and certainly the closest they ever got with an original but elements like the keyboard, the second guitar and even the vocal detract from the purity, imo. To be pure reggae, everyone has got to get it for the whole tune. Still think Get Up Stand Up is the purest they ever got, obviously a subjective opinion.
Quote
TravelinMan
I see why I got a letter wasn't pursued. That guitar is annoying!
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
Naturalust
An obvious attempt to be pure and certainly the closest they ever got with an original but elements like the keyboard, the second guitar and even the vocal detract from the purity, imo. To be pure reggae, everyone has got to get it for the whole tune. Still think Get Up Stand Up is the purest they ever got, obviously a subjective opinion.
Subjective indeed, but with your logic one might say that Mick is the "unpure" element on Get Up, Stand Up.
Keith has the accent right (in places), as well as the voice trembling
Quote
NaturalustQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
Naturalust
An obvious attempt to be pure and certainly the closest they ever got with an original but elements like the keyboard, the second guitar and even the vocal detract from the purity, imo. To be pure reggae, everyone has got to get it for the whole tune. Still think Get Up Stand Up is the purest they ever got, obviously a subjective opinion.
Subjective indeed, but with your logic one might say that Mick is the "unpure" element on Get Up, Stand Up.
Keith has the accent right (in places), as well as the voice trembling
I actually thought Mick stayed pretty close to the bone on GUSU, "What I say..." and even added a slight accent (at times) for authenticity.But certainly all the musicians kept a reggae groove and backbeat going where as with I Got a Letter that second guitar strays into different territory with mixed results, imo. Takes away from the mantra like purity of the reggae beat.
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
NaturalustQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
Naturalust
An obvious attempt to be pure and certainly the closest they ever got with an original but elements like the keyboard, the second guitar and even the vocal detract from the purity, imo. To be pure reggae, everyone has got to get it for the whole tune. Still think Get Up Stand Up is the purest they ever got, obviously a subjective opinion.
Subjective indeed, but with your logic one might say that Mick is the "unpure" element on Get Up, Stand Up.
Keith has the accent right (in places), as well as the voice trembling
I actually thought Mick stayed pretty close to the bone on GUSU, "What I say..." and even added a slight accent (at times) for authenticity.But certainly all the musicians kept a reggae groove and backbeat going where as with I Got a Letter that second guitar strays into different territory with mixed results, imo. Takes away from the mantra like purity of the reggae beat.
I don't disagree with that. At the same time, I haven't heard Bill or Darryl manage to lock in with the single-string rhythm guitar the way Keith does on I Got A Letter, as well as on Cherry Oh Baby. Very important for the reggae groove together with the drums, imo.
Quote
DandelionPowderman
Yep, I do, and that was what I was hinting of. Keith has that reggae touch in his bass playing. Bill not so much.
Quote
Palace Revolution 2000
I just got done listening to the alternate version; all early or alternate mixes. Just lightyears better and tougher than the official. Whoever threw the blanket over the mix/mastering desk in Munich did this album in.
GHS has received much late acclaim, and IORR would have kept the big run going.
Quote
SomeGuy
One of my favourite albums, still. Actually the first Stones record I owned.
I have always regarded it as a fresher, more modern sounding album than the more or less stale sounding GHS, something which was confirmed by the story about Jimmy Miller wasting their time at the studio and Keith and Mick taking over the production duties at the time.
The only slightly dull song is Luxury, too monotonous and repetitive really. Ain't Too Proud To Beg I don't like at all.
Lyrically the songs vary greatly from arrogant and provocative to deeply sensitive, so it has all, really.
I call this the sixth golden era album, after BB, LIB, SF, EOMS and GHS (GHS was actually a step back in the series as it were, so there's only five really).
Sadly this level became more of an exception than rule, starting with the next album. But I'm sure that many differ with me
Quote
treaclefingersQuote
SomeGuy
One of my favourite albums, still. Actually the first Stones record I owned.
I have always regarded it as a fresher, more modern sounding album than the more or less stale sounding GHS, something which was confirmed by the story about Jimmy Miller wasting their time at the studio and Keith and Mick taking over the production duties at the time.
The only slightly dull song is Luxury, too monotonous and repetitive really. Ain't Too Proud To Beg I don't like at all.
Lyrically the songs vary greatly from arrogant and provocative to deeply sensitive, so it has all, really.
I call this the sixth golden era album, after BB, LIB, SF, EOMS and GHS (GHS was actually a step back in the series as it were, so there's only five really).
Sadly this level became more of an exception than rule, starting with the next album. But I'm sure that many differ with me
I don't disagree at all with you here...however if we're going to be revisionist in terms of classifying "The Big Four" to stretch it to IORR, then I think Black and Blue certainly isn't a low point by any means, which takes you to Some Girls an the "next" big 4, Some Girls through Undercover. That means what you've got is a BIG 11. Now that's big!
On the other side, I think that TSMR is a bit of a dip, like GHS as you've opined, but not a bad album...you could then go further past BtB to Aftermath.
The album run is then 14...stunning. But really, that's why we like this band so much isn't it? It's not bullet proof by any means but staggeringly high quality for the most part.
Nothing wrong with OOOH's either...ok, you have to stop somewhere!
Quote
SomeGuy
I couldn't agree with you more on the Big Four issue. Actually I never wholeheartedly embraced that concept, because it suggests that the previous and later albums are less valuable, which of course is not the case. I for one love the early years a lot.
Perhaps that's part of the reason why I felt the need to extend the number of 'Big' albums a bit. Most Stones albums are Big! Seeing how many records they have made and how very few of them aren't good, I mean, really.
Having said that, of course some albums are more equal than others, to paraphrase Orwell. To me, the next Biggest Record after IORR that came out was TY. For others, SG was that moment, so there ya go...