For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
dcbaQuote
More Hot RocksQuote
GasLightStreet
Sorry. No. There's no improving a pile of shit other than to make it bigger and smellier.
Yupe!
You're both wrong. The finished product (the DW album) darmatically fails to represent these 1985 sessions. There is indeed enough good material to make a 3-cd edition.
But good luck persuading Mick to rework this one = to relive this period of the band's history!
Quote
matxil
Of course, saying people don't like Dirty Work because it's too "hard rock" is a rather silly thing to say.
What's so hard-rock about "Back To Zero" (to mention the worst song they ever did ever) or "Too Rude", or "Winning Ugly" (which I like, but the rest of the world hates), "Harlem Shuffle" or "Sleep Tonight"? The only song maybe "hard-rock" is "Fight", if for you "hard-rock" means just slamming chords and screaming something on top of it in a fake growling voice.
The reason most people hate this album is:
- The production is terrible, especially the drums, the bass and the keyboards
- The songs are lazy song-writing ("Back To Zero", "Don't Hold Back", "Fight" are the typical examples)
- There is no groove in most songs, which is a deadly sin on a Stones album
- Mick Jagger is pretending to be very angry about something but it sounds fake.
- It has "Back To Zero" on it.
- And "Hold Back".
- It has the horrendous "Winning Ugly" on it, to that point, their worst EVER.
Quote
matxil
Having said all that, over the years, the album becomes slightly more listenable for two reasons:
- There are a few (2 - 5 at most) songs on it which are ok to (very) good (One Hit).
- At least they tried some kind of "adventure", doing something "different", which is more than you can say about most of the stuff they did afterwards (apart from some of Keith's solo stuff)
Quote
HighwireCQuote
2000manQuote
Turner68
...the songwriting is pretty awful. that, and the very dated 80s production, is why i think it's one of their worst.
and I hate the cover too
So have a look:
and
2016, we'll see ....
Quote
GasLightStreetQuote
OllyQuote
GasLightStreet
If there was ever an album the Stones could delete from their discography it would have to be DIRTY WORK. Or at least change it to an EP:
Harlem Shuffle
Too Rude
Dirty Work
Had It With You
Sleep Tonight
Why would you exclude the album's opening track?
Because it sucks.
Quote
RockinJive
The whole album is filler.Along with emotional rescue and Undercover.
Quote
GasLightStreet
It's not more listenable. It never will be. They didn't 'try' some kind of adventure, they vomited a giant yawn of music and shat a rainbow of Crayola artwork to match the shiny keyboard musitardism of Back To Zero and Winning Ugly. Fine guitar playing? Even the worst songs in rock may have excellent guitar playing on them. The songs still suck. Period. Even the good ones on this grease trap of an album.
Something different? UNDERCOVER, my man - the last true adventurous Stones LP as The Rolling Stones.
Quote
dcba
The finished product (the DW album) darmatically fails to represent these 1985 sessions. There is indeed enough good material to make a 3-cd edition.
Quote
HMS
It´s a pity that some people will never understand how great Dirty Work is. It is sharp, dangerous and in no way outdated. The last great Stones-album in history, an overseen gem and one of their all-time best. Marvelous album from start to finish, any addition or exclusion would only ruin this masterpiece.
Quote
2000manQuote
Turner68
...the songwriting is pretty awful. that, and the very dated 80s production, is why i think it's one of their worst.
and I hate the cover too
Quote
HMS
Have a look at the title: "Dirty Work". This is exactly what you get. It is rough,raw and edgy. The songs are simple and straight forward. And it is surely not a good example for "horrible 80ies production". Compared to Tina Turner´s or David Bowie´s terrible 80ies efforts DW is almost old-fashioned production-wise. I think it is well produced, the use of keyboards is minimal for an 80ies album, only Winning Ugly and Back To Zero are typical 80ies, but Winning Ugly is still great, what a marvelous bass-line. Back To Zero grows with every listening, the bridge is irresistable. One Hit is exceptionally good and so are those fine little dirty rockers Had It With You and Dirty Work. Hold Back and Fight are not the most melodious songs the Stones ever wrote but are full of energy and kick ass. Too Rude is a fine example for Keith adopting Reggae. Harlem Shuffle knocks me out and Keith has his shining moment with a beautiful ballad. And I have to admit that I like Mick´s angry vocals a lot. He sounds so bold and full of energy. Me personally don´t think we will ever get an expanded version of Dirty Work, unfortunately it is very under-rated and under-rated albums usually do not get a deluxe-treatment. Finally what´s wrong with the cover? We have got dirty toilets and a parade of freaks on Stones-Covers, here we got a photo of the band wearing bright-colored clothes, nothing exceptional horrible to it.
Quote
Olly
Interesting. Where would you rank it in terms of quality amongst the studio albums?
Quote
HMSQuote
Olly
Interesting. Where would you rank it in terms of quality amongst the studio albums?
1. Sticky Fingers
2. Let It Bleed
3. Beggars Banquet
4. Exile On Main Street
5. Black And Blue
6. Dirty Work
5. Exile On Main Street
7. Undercover
8. Tattoo You
....
It is their best record since Black And Blue.
Quote
matxilQuote
HMSQuote
Olly
Interesting. Where would you rank it in terms of quality amongst the studio albums?
1. Sticky Fingers
2. Let It Bleed
3. Beggars Banquet
4. Exile On Main Street
5. Black And Blue
6. Dirty Work
5. Exile On Main Street
7. Undercover
8. Tattoo You
....
It is their best record since Black And Blue.
So you think Exile is both better and worse than Dirty Work?
Quote
HMS
It´s a pity that some people will never understand how great Dirty Work is. It is sharp, dangerous and in no way outdated. The last great Stones-album in history, an overseen gem and one of their all-time best. Marvelous album from start to finish, any addition or exclusion would only ruin this masterpiece.
Quote
Silver Dagger
Quote
HMS
It´s a pity that some people will never understand how great Dirty Work is. It is sharp, dangerous and in no way outdated. The last great Stones-album in history, an overseen gem and one of their all-time best. Marvelous album from start to finish, any addition or exclusion would only ruin this masterpiece.
Quote
dcbaQuote
More Hot RocksQuote
GasLightStreet
Sorry. No. There's no improving a pile of shit other than to make it bigger and smellier.
Yupe!
You're both wrong. The finished product (the DW album) darmatically fails to represent these 1985 sessions. There is indeed enough good material to make a 3-cd edition.
But good luck persuading Mick to rework this one = to relive this period of the band's history!
Quote
GasLightStreetQuote
HMS
It´s a pity that some people will never understand how great Dirty Work is. It is sharp, dangerous and in no way outdated. The last great Stones-album in history, an overseen gem and one of their all-time best. Marvelous album from start to finish, any addition or exclusion would only ruin this masterpiece.
How theblinddeaf have spoken.
Quote
More Hot RocksQuote
GasLightStreetQuote
HMS
It´s a pity that some people will never understand how great Dirty Work is. It is sharp, dangerous and in no way outdated. The last great Stones-album in history, an overseen gem and one of their all-time best. Marvelous album from start to finish, any addition or exclusion would only ruin this masterpiece.
How theblinddeaf have spoken.
You know GLS I enjoy your posts, You speak the truth on this board. TY