For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
stonesrule
There are members of the Stones who regularly give money to those in need
Quote
stonesrule
triceratops, what the Stones do with their money or their wills is none of your business. Has it ever occurred to you that Mick Jagger loves his children and they love him? None of the Stones families push them to tour. Nor do their employees. These are FACTS.
I'm happy to hear you're involved with a non-profit, as am I and numerous others who post here. There are members of the Stones who regularly give money to those in need; they just don't go on the Internet to brag about how caring they are.
Quote
StonesTodQuote
stonesrule
There are members of the Stones who regularly give money to those in need
they've been a little irregular lately with me....
Quote
triceratopsQuote
stonesrule
triceratops, you've been posting here for six weeks and you are surely one of the most jealous people on the planet.
Of who in particular? I am mostly a Mick Taylor booster who would love to see him get a proper payday for his past work and I say good and bad things about Mick and Keith. I make a few snide remarks and jokes at their expense but its not because I am jealous. Are you taking this all too seriously?
Quote
flacnvinyl
Is this thread still about Chicago?
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
roby
SFTD, still a complete ratage. No guitar playing (Keith and Ron) for long seconds, only Chuck...
Like on the definite version on BB
Quote
roby
Perhaps, but that option doesn't work at all live...Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
roby
SFTD, still a complete ratage. No guitar playing (Keith and Ron) for long seconds, only Chuck...
Like on the definite version on BB
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
roby
Perhaps, but that option doesn't work at all live...Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
roby
SFTD, still a complete ratage. No guitar playing (Keith and Ron) for long seconds, only Chuck...
Like on the definite version on BB
It worked very well in 89/90, but now it's stale and tired. One of the reasons are Chuck and his honky tonkin', the other is Mick's singing + the guitars are not as good as they were back then.
So it's not necessarily the arrangement, but the excecution and the actual performance.
It was a highlight on the Urban Jungle tour.
Quote
Palace Revolution 2000Quote
Max'sKansasCity
She has that cutie pie smile down perfect.... Sheryl I mean.
Amazing. leave to Mick Jagger to knock someone (MT) in shape.
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
roby
Perhaps, but that option doesn't work at all live...Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
roby
SFTD, still a complete ratage. No guitar playing (Keith and Ron) for long seconds, only Chuck...
Like on the definite version on BB
It worked very well in 89/90, but now it's stale and tired. One of the reasons are Chuck and his honky tonkin', the other is Mick's singing + the guitars are not as good as they were back then.
So it's not necessarily the arrangement, but the excecution and the actual performance.
It was a highlight on the Urban Jungle tour.
Quote
sonomastoneQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
roby
Perhaps, but that option doesn't work at all live...Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
roby
SFTD, still a complete ratage. No guitar playing (Keith and Ron) for long seconds, only Chuck...
Like on the definite version on BB
It worked very well in 89/90, but now it's stale and tired. One of the reasons are Chuck and his honky tonkin', the other is Mick's singing + the guitars are not as good as they were back then.
So it's not necessarily the arrangement, but the excecution and the actual performance.
It was a highlight on the Urban Jungle tour.
I think they are playing great on this tour. Sftd is an abomination however and it alone is grounds for firing Chuck. Not that there is any lack of reasons.
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
sonomastoneQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
roby
Perhaps, but that option doesn't work at all live...Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
roby
SFTD, still a complete ratage. No guitar playing (Keith and Ron) for long seconds, only Chuck...
Like on the definite version on BB
It worked very well in 89/90, but now it's stale and tired. One of the reasons are Chuck and his honky tonkin', the other is Mick's singing + the guitars are not as good as they were back then.
So it's not necessarily the arrangement, but the excecution and the actual performance.
It was a highlight on the Urban Jungle tour.
I think they are playing great on this tour. Sftd is an abomination however and it alone is grounds for firing Chuck. Not that there is any lack of reasons.
It is much better on this tour than on the BB-tour. Especially Mick and Keith. Chuck is still pulling in the wrong direction on this one, imo.
Quote
His Majesty
Have you read Improvisation: Its Nature and Practice in Music by Derek Bailey?
Quote
JesseQuote
His Majesty
Have you read Improvisation: Its Nature and Practice in Music by Derek Bailey?
I wasn't going to post again but after reading the above wise words from Slew, I had to write one more time.
STOP your bellyaching people! You sound like 10 yr olds. Stop trying to sound like experts -- you know nothing about performing for 50 years.
"Too much theatricality"... "not enough musicality"... "fire Chuck" "More MT, MORE MT."
What a bunch of clowns! I was going to continue reading this thread but it's not worth it.
Quote
slew
Can we please stop all of this Mick Taylor nonsense!!! Would I like to see more of him yeah sure but if he does not play more then he does not play more. What we have here is the Rolling Stones 2013 and they rock with and without Mick Taylor. Mick Jagger is proving beyond a doubt that he is the greates frontman ever. to be performing and singing like he is at basically 70 years old is inspiring to me anyways. keith and Ronnie have bounced back nicely and Charlie is as solid as ever. Tickets are expensive but if you don't want to pay the money then don't. I'm sick to death of the whining and the Mick Taylor is this savior. the Stones have revitalized him not the other way around.
Let's just enjoy the guys while they can still do this!!!
Quote
JesseQuote
slew
Can we please stop all of this Mick Taylor nonsense!!! Would I like to see more of him yeah sure but if he does not play more then he does not play more. What we have here is the Rolling Stones 2013 and they rock with and without Mick Taylor. Mick Jagger is proving beyond a doubt that he is the greates frontman ever. to be performing and singing like he is at basically 70 years old is inspiring to me anyways. keith and Ronnie have bounced back nicely and Charlie is as solid as ever. Tickets are expensive but if you don't want to pay the money then don't. I'm sick to death of the whining and the Mick Taylor is this savior. the Stones have revitalized him not the other way around.
Let's just enjoy the guys while they can still do this!!!
I agree with Slew, I'm Jesse's husband. Stop sounding like whining babies. Enjoy a concert like adults or sit on your asses and play your old recordings that you love so much. Mick Taylor should get on his knees again -- but in thanks that the Stones allowed him to play with them again. Why should they even have confidence in him? Two songs is more than enough. MT wants his long solos, he doesn't like to be part of a group sound -- and that's what the Stones are today.
Here's to the 2013 Stones. They don't need your advice.
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
two4fun111
I think you're all wrong and all right. But I'm not paying this kind of money unless I get ALOT of Mick Taylor. After seeing them 34 times, I think I've earned that for myself. To each his own.
Spend them on Taylor solo shows, then.
Quote
duffydawgQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
two4fun111
I think you're all wrong and all right. But I'm not paying this kind of money unless I get ALOT of Mick Taylor. After seeing them 34 times, I think I've earned that for myself. To each his own.
Spend them on Taylor solo shows, then.
I have already stipulated that Taylor isn't a great Solo act. But the problem for many here is that Taylor does make the Stones better - deal with that.
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
duffydawgQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
two4fun111
I think you're all wrong and all right. But I'm not paying this kind of money unless I get ALOT of Mick Taylor. After seeing them 34 times, I think I've earned that for myself. To each his own.
Spend them on Taylor solo shows, then.
I have already stipulated that Taylor isn't a great Solo act. But the problem for many here is that Taylor does make the Stones better - deal with that.
Sometimes he does, sometimes he doesn't. Deal with that.
Quote
kleermakerQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
duffydawgQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
two4fun111
I think you're all wrong and all right. But I'm not paying this kind of money unless I get ALOT of Mick Taylor. After seeing them 34 times, I think I've earned that for myself. To each his own.
Spend them on Taylor solo shows, then.
I have already stipulated that Taylor isn't a great Solo act. But the problem for many here is that Taylor does make the Stones better - deal with that.
Sometimes he does, sometimes he doesn't. Deal with that.
He always does, like nobody else. Taylor is made for Stones songs, Ronnie isn't. He is a Face and always will be. The Stones music is in Taylor's genes, not in Ronnie's.
Quote
kleermakerQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
duffydawgQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
two4fun111
I think you're all wrong and all right. But I'm not paying this kind of money unless I get ALOT of Mick Taylor. After seeing them 34 times, I think I've earned that for myself. To each his own.
Spend them on Taylor solo shows, then.
I have already stipulated that Taylor isn't a great Solo act. But the problem for many here is that Taylor does make the Stones better - deal with that.
Sometimes he does, sometimes he doesn't. Deal with that.
He always does, like nobody else. Taylor is made for Stones songs, Ronnie isn't. He is a Face and always will be. The Stones music is in Taylor's genes, not in Ronnie's.