For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
DandelionPowderman
This was Keith's forte up till 89. After that he started to play too much, imo. Today he is back on the right path, although his abilities have detoriated.
Quote
Thrylan
I mentioned earlier that after picking up and watching biggest Bang, I have alot to rethink. I am realizing that after getting off after NS, alot has/hasn't happened. Keith needs to stick to mean riffs(MR), mean open G riffs he can still pull, and Chuck B two note stuff. I hate to sound all technical but he falls into the same bumnote, interior pentatonic trap every damn time. In contrast, I see Ronnie doing different things, heavier things, and a heavier sound. I think his time with Slash he picked up some new stuff. I also see him stretching to cover for Keith.
One example.......On Sway he has trouble with the slide solo, but hes playing a guitar, not neccesarily set up for slide. He ditches it to cover Keiths spottiness, does much better on the next solo and jumps right back to help Keith. A big ask.........MT is better, but all he has to do is solo. Sigh......Keith
Quote
mgshorr
"If I had more time, I'd have written a shorter letter."
It's well known that everyone here drools over Mick Taylor solos, but what about Keith's? Playing far fewer notes, and making use of silence, Keith can be very effective with his solos. (i.e. the shorter letter reference)
Put another way: Forget musical technicalities for a second and listen to his overall sound.
Keith creates a distinctive, devilish feeling that he is attacking the silence, only to let it build back up so he can beat it down again...
Instead of just droning on the whole time with note after hypnotizing note...Keith will play a few licks, wait, then strike again at just the right moment...
True he may not be as "technically gifted" as Clapton/Jon Mayer/Gary Clarke Jr. But given the right tune, Keith can damn sure rip a powerful solo.
Take a listen to the links below and let me know what you think. Keith's solos are the only ones that really hit me in the gut....
1) Champagne and Reefer Keef Solo = ~3:30 minute mark
2) Goin' Down Keef Solo = ~5:30 minute mark
Champagne and Reefer
Goin' Down
MGS
Quote
mgshorr
"If I had more time, I'd have written a shorter letter."
It's well known that everyone here drools over Mick Taylor solos, but what about Keith's? Playing far fewer notes, and making use of silence, Keith can be very effective with his solos. (i.e. the shorter letter reference)
Put another way: Forget musical technicalities for a second and listen to his overall sound.
Keith creates a distinctive, devilish feeling that he is attacking the silence, only to let it build back up so he can beat it down again...
Instead of just droning on the whole time with note after hypnotizing note...Keith will play a few licks, wait, then strike again at just the right moment...
True he may not be as "technically gifted" as Clapton/Jon Mayer/Gary Clarke Jr. But given the right tune, Keith can damn sure rip a powerful solo.
Take a listen to the links below and let me know what you think. Keith's solos are the only ones that really hit me in the gut....
1) Champagne and Reefer Keef Solo = ~3:30 minute mark
2) Goin' Down Keef Solo = ~5:30 minute mark
Champagne and Reefer
Goin' Down
MGS
Quote
jazzbassQuote
mgshorr
"If I had more time, I'd have written a shorter letter."
It's well known that everyone here drools over Mick Taylor solos, but what about Keith's? Playing far fewer notes, and making use of silence, Keith can be very effective with his solos. (i.e. the shorter letter reference)
Put another way: Forget musical technicalities for a second and listen to his overall sound.
Keith creates a distinctive, devilish feeling that he is attacking the silence, only to let it build back up so he can beat it down again...
Instead of just droning on the whole time with note after hypnotizing note...Keith will play a few licks, wait, then strike again at just the right moment...
True he may not be as "technically gifted" as Clapton/Jon Mayer/Gary Clarke Jr. But given the right tune, Keith can damn sure rip a powerful solo.
Take a listen to the links below and let me know what you think. Keith's solos are the only ones that really hit me in the gut....
1) Champagne and Reefer Keef Solo = ~3:30 minute mark
2) Goin' Down Keef Solo = ~5:30 minute mark
Champagne and Reefer
Goin' Down
MGS
Keith's solo on C&R was one of many highlights at O2 11/29. Sweet and simple is often the best when talking guitar solos IMO.
Quote
Munichhilton
Having just finished Still Life start to finish, Keith was fantastic in 1981...too many highlights for a list.
Under My Thumb is just great...
Quote
sanQQuote
Thrylan
I mentioned earlier that after picking up and watching biggest Bang, I have alot to rethink. I am realizing that after getting off after NS, alot has/hasn't happened. Keith needs to stick to mean riffs(MR), mean open G riffs he can still pull, and Chuck B two note stuff. I hate to sound all technical but he falls into the same bumnote, interior pentatonic trap every damn time. In contrast, I see Ronnie doing different things, heavier things, and a heavier sound. I think his time with Slash he picked up some new stuff. I also see him stretching to cover for Keith.
One example.......On Sway he has trouble with the slide solo, but hes playing a guitar, not neccesarily set up for slide. He ditches it to cover Keiths spottiness, does much better on the next solo and jumps right back to help Keith. A big ask.........MT is better, but all he has to do is solo. Sigh......Keith
Yeah that's a good way of putting it. Bumnotes that don't sound good yet he keeps playing them.
Ronnie is holding up the guitar playing, no doubt about that. I wonder what exactly is going on with Keith physically. There has to be something. He's way less mobile onstage, plays a lot less, and does seem to be deteriorating. When I saw him in 2006, it was after the 'coconut incident' and he was even slowed down then compared to how I had known him to be. It seemed like he didn't feel good. I also read somewhere that it was a heart attack, not brain surgery. Whatever it was, he's never been the same since. But that's age too. I'm thankful though that he's still playing.
Quote
GRNRBITWQuote
Munichhilton
Having just finished Still Life start to finish, Keith was fantastic in 1981...too many highlights for a list.
Under My Thumb is just great...
still life is still a bore. with all the fab recordings from that fab tour, why listen to such a lame record? sometimes i don't know you...actually, i never do....
Quote
MunichhiltonQuote
GRNRBITWQuote
Munichhilton
Having just finished Still Life start to finish, Keith was fantastic in 1981...too many highlights for a list.
Under My Thumb is just great...
still life is still a bore. with all the fab recordings from that fab tour, why listen to such a lame record? sometimes i don't know you...actually, i never do....
I prefer my live recordings heavily overdubbed...I just can't handle the 'danger' of non overdubbed Stones...
Quote
Stoneage
Basically Keith do great solos but he can't sustain them for more than 5-10 seconds. After that: Bum notes and off pace playing.
Quote
Munichhilton
I prefer my live recordings heavily overdubbed...I just can't handle the 'danger' of non overdubbed Stones...
Quote
Munichhilton
Having just finished Still Life start to finish, Keith was fantastic in 1981...too many highlights for a list.
Under My Thumb is just great...
Quote
thrak
Let's be honest Keith solos are all the same. Few typical rock licks. Today i'm affraid of him trying to play Sympathy solo. It's awful. I like Keith solo on live with me, iorr, you got me rockin. But it's not as good as it used to be. Anyway i love him.
Quote
beachbreak
There's plenty of lead players i.e., Mayer, SRV, Kenny Wayne Shepherd that are great but sound very much alike.
Quote
GRNRBITWQuote
MunichhiltonQuote
GRNRBITWQuote
Munichhilton
Having just finished Still Life start to finish, Keith was fantastic in 1981...too many highlights for a list.
Under My Thumb is just great...
still life is still a bore. with all the fab recordings from that fab tour, why listen to such a lame record? sometimes i don't know you...actually, i never do....
I prefer my live recordings heavily overdubbed...I just can't handle the 'danger' of non overdubbed Stones...
how do you like your Dead recordings?
Quote
MunichhiltonQuote
beachbreak
There's plenty of lead players i.e., Mayer, SRV, Kenny Wayne Shepherd that are great but sound very much alike.
You named two guys who have made a living copying SRV...they can't be lumped together...NOBODY sounded like SRV before SRV...shame on you
Quote
GRNRBITWQuote
MunichhiltonQuote
beachbreak
There's plenty of lead players i.e., Mayer, SRV, Kenny Wayne Shepherd that are great but sound very much alike.
You named two guys who have made a living copying SRV...they can't be lumped together...NOBODY sounded like SRV before SRV...shame on you
albert king sounded like srv before srv. he was trying to cash in on the pre-srv craze....