I am really curious and anxious as to what his next album will be after this tour is over? Plenty of great exposure for him!

My feeling is that if the Stones do some new material, he might have a hand in it contributing a solo or some licks here and there maybe. As for another solo record, I'm not sure. I think something with the Stones might come first.

He's certainly going to be able to tour bigger venues for more money after all this exposure.

Quote
ohnonotyouagain
He's certainly going to be able to tour bigger venues for more money after all this exposure.

This is the break he needed to get his career kick started again! I am sure Ronnie and Keith will help out on his solo album this time. He has soloed for them pn their albums in the past.

Quote
PhillyFAN
I am really curious and anxious as to what his next album will be after this tour is over? Plenty of great exposure for him!

The Stones should re-instate him! He should finish his career with the Stones where he belongs!

Quote
JumpinJackOLantern

Quote
PhillyFAN
I am really curious and anxious as to what his next album will be after this tour is over? Plenty of great exposure for him!

The Stones should re-instate him! He should finish his career with the Stones where he belongs!

I agree but sadly I son't think that will happen. It would be incredible though. I would love to see it.

Quote
PhillyFAN

Quote
JumpinJackOLantern

Quote
PhillyFAN
I am really curious and anxious as to what his next album will be after this tour is over? Plenty of great exposure for him!

The Stones should re-instate him! He should finish his career with the Stones where he belongs!

I agree but sadly I son't think that will happen. It would be incredible though. I would love to see it.

The Stones are awesome without Taylor, but are Super Awesome with him! It's as simple as that. Now, they just need to hire Bob Dylan to write and we will definitely throttle the Beatles once and for all!

Quote
JumpinJackOLantern

The Stones are awesome without Taylor, but are Super Awesome with him! It's as simple as that.

Can you write the same sentence without any use of the word awesome? You have 3 minutes...

"Can you write the same sentence without any use of the word awesome? You have 3 minutes..."

No i am so sorry i can´t

Quote
JumpinJackOLantern

Quote
PhillyFAN

Quote
JumpinJackOLantern

Quote
PhillyFAN
I am really curious and anxious as to what his next album will be after this tour is over? Plenty of great exposure for him!

The Stones should re-instate him! He should finish his career with the Stones where he belongs!

I agree but sadly I son't think that will happen. It would be incredible though. I would love to see it.

The Stones are awesome without Taylor, but are Super Awesome with him! It's as simple as that. Now, they just need to hire Bob Dylan to write and we will definitely throttle the Beatles once and for all!

what if they also hired clapton and tom waits? they would definitely beat the beatles then, right? four guitar lineup with clapton/taylor/woods/richards, four songwriters - clapton, dylan, jagger, richards, and two singers - jagger and waits. they could really give the beatles a shot!

Wouldn't it be hilarious if all members of The Stones contribute to a new Mick Taylor solo record, but only with each Stone on different tracks, the way the former Beatles did with Ringo's 1974 solo album?

Quote
stonehearted
Wouldn't it be hilarious if all members of The Stones contribute to a new Mick Taylor solo record, but only with each Stone on different tracks, the way the former Beatles did with Ringo's 1974 solo album?

i don't recall hilarity about that album. but i wasn't much for laughing in '74 what with watergate and the war and stuff...

Quote
GRNRBITW

Quote
stonehearted
Wouldn't it be hilarious if all members of The Stones contribute to a new Mick Taylor solo record, but only with each Stone on different tracks, the way the former Beatles did with Ringo's 1974 solo album?

i don't recall hilarity about that album. but i wasn't much for laughing in '74 what with watergate and the war and stuff...

But the weed was cheaper than gasoline. Surely you must have been grinning through it all at least some of the time.

Quote
stonehearted

Quote
GRNRBITW

Quote
stonehearted
Wouldn't it be hilarious if all members of The Stones contribute to a new Mick Taylor solo record, but only with each Stone on different tracks, the way the former Beatles did with Ringo's 1974 solo album?

i don't recall hilarity about that album. but i wasn't much for laughing in '74 what with watergate and the war and stuff...

But the weed was cheaper than gasoline. Surely you must have been grinning through it all at least some of the time.

war, watergate and weed...where have all the good times gone?

Quote
GRNRBITW

Quote
stonehearted
Wouldn't it be hilarious if all members of The Stones contribute to a new Mick Taylor solo record, but only with each Stone on different tracks, the way the former Beatles did with Ringo's 1974 solo album?

i don't recall hilarity about that album. but i wasn't much for laughing in '74 what with watergate and the war and stuff...

What about 1973... when the album ACTUALLY came out?



[thepowergoats.com]

Quote
jamesfdouglas

Quote
GRNRBITW

Quote
stonehearted
Wouldn't it be hilarious if all members of The Stones contribute to a new Mick Taylor solo record, but only with each Stone on different tracks, the way the former Beatles did with Ringo's 1974 solo album?

i don't recall hilarity about that album. but i wasn't much for laughing in '74 what with watergate and the war and stuff...

What about 1973... when the album ACTUALLY came out?

Snap again...too much snapness for an atheist!

Quote
jamesfdouglas

Quote
GRNRBITW

Quote
stonehearted
Wouldn't it be hilarious if all members of The Stones contribute to a new Mick Taylor solo record, but only with each Stone on different tracks, the way the former Beatles did with Ringo's 1974 solo album?

i don't recall hilarity about that album. but i wasn't much for laughing in '74 what with watergate and the war and stuff...

What about 1973... when the album ACTUALLY came out?

oh. yeah it was funny then...but the laughter quickly abated....

I would like to think Taylor would record an all Stones songs album as a follow up to this tour for all his fans that wanted to hear him play om some of the songs. I am sure he would do well and make some money!

Quote
jamesfdouglas

Quote
GRNRBITW

Quote
stonehearted
Wouldn't it be hilarious if all members of The Stones contribute to a new Mick Taylor solo record, but only with each Stone on different tracks, the way the former Beatles did with Ringo's 1974 solo album?

i don't recall hilarity about that album. but i wasn't much for laughing in '74 what with watergate and the war and stuff...

What about 1973... when the album ACTUALLY came out?

Okay, if you want to be precise about it--but 1973 was almost over when the album was released that November. I've always associated the album with 1974--because some of the singles from the record spilled over into that year, and that was the year when the album's sales and chart positioning peaked.

Also, the Ringo album was counted among the international year-end charts for 1974 (including for Canada), rather than for 1973.

It's like Band On The Run--released in 1973, but didn't make much of a dent until 1974.

And what about 1973, you ask? Well, I imagine the weed was even cheaper still.



Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 2013-05-20 00:59 by stonehearted.

Quote
stonehearted

Quote
jamesfdouglas

Quote
GRNRBITW

Quote
stonehearted
Wouldn't it be hilarious if all members of The Stones contribute to a new Mick Taylor solo record, but only with each Stone on different tracks, the way the former Beatles did with Ringo's 1974 solo album?

i don't recall hilarity about that album. but i wasn't much for laughing in '74 what with watergate and the war and stuff...

What about 1973... when the album ACTUALLY came out?

Okay, if you want to be precise about it--but 1973 was almost over when the album was released that November. I've always associated the album with 1974--because some of the singles from the record spilled over into that year, and that was the year when the album's sales and chart positioning peaked.

Also, the Ringo album was counted among the international year-end charts for 1974 (including for Canada), rather than for 1973.

It's like Band On The Run--released in 1973, but didn't make much of a dent until 1974.

And what about 1973, you ask? Well, I imagine the weed was even cheaper still.

I just finished mowing all the weed at the ranch here...are you suggesting its worth something now?

Hahaha!

Fair enough, U2's Achtung Baby was also November 1991, but the tour, hype and successful singles were 1992.

Pardon my Godless in the Snapway...


[thepowergoats.com]

Quote
Munichhilton

Quote
stonehearted

Quote
jamesfdouglas

Quote
GRNRBITW

Quote
stonehearted
Wouldn't it be hilarious if all members of The Stones contribute to a new Mick Taylor solo record, but only with each Stone on different tracks, the way the former Beatles did with Ringo's 1974 solo album?

i don't recall hilarity about that album. but i wasn't much for laughing in '74 what with watergate and the war and stuff...

What about 1973... when the album ACTUALLY came out?

Okay, if you want to be precise about it--but 1973 was almost over when the album was released that November. I've always associated the album with 1974--because some of the singles from the record spilled over into that year, and that was the year when the album's sales and chart positioning peaked.

Also, the Ringo album was counted among the international year-end charts for 1974 (including for Canada), rather than for 1973.

It's like Band On The Run--released in 1973, but didn't make much of a dent until 1974.

And what about 1973, you ask? Well, I imagine the weed was even cheaper still.

I just finished mowing all the weed at the ranch here...are you suggesting its worth something now?

Well, if you're selling, I'm buying.

Quote
ohnonotyouagain
He's certainly going to be able to tour bigger venues for more money after all this exposure.

I doubt it. He still isn't well known, and we are all going crazy over him, but most folks have no idea who he is/was...



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2013-05-20 07:41 by whitem8.

Quote
PhillyFAN
I am really curious and anxious as to what his next album will be after this tour is over? Plenty of great exposure for him!

He will probably appear on the live album from this tour - that will be the next one.

Mick Taylor's next album should be a Rolling Stones album.

Quote
stonehearted

Quote
Munichhilton

Quote
stonehearted

Quote
jamesfdouglas

Quote
GRNRBITW

Quote
stonehearted
Wouldn't it be hilarious if all members of The Stones contribute to a new Mick Taylor solo record, but only with each Stone on different tracks, the way the former Beatles did with Ringo's 1974 solo album?

i don't recall hilarity about that album. but i wasn't much for laughing in '74 what with watergate and the war and stuff...

What about 1973... when the album ACTUALLY came out?

Okay, if you want to be precise about it--but 1973 was almost over when the album was released that November. I've always associated the album with 1974--because some of the singles from the record spilled over into that year, and that was the year when the album's sales and chart positioning peaked.

Also, the Ringo album was counted among the international year-end charts for 1974 (including for Canada), rather than for 1973.

It's like Band On The Run--released in 1973, but didn't make much of a dent until 1974.

And what about 1973, you ask? Well, I imagine the weed was even cheaper still.

I just finished mowing all the weed at the ranch here...are you suggesting its worth something now?

Well, if you're selling, I'm buying.

OK, but....Ok....but....this stuff?.....OK....but....