For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
VT22Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
VT22Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
VT22
No, he's not. However, I've always found Taylor's playing good, but he has indeed developed a different style, playing very often without a pick. The runs are shorter, his sense of timing is different and the sound is cleaner.
I've seen him live three times before, and he always played well - no matter how the show was. However, none of those gigs showed the Taylor we know from the 70s.[DP]
Yes, I agree, the runs a shorter, the sound is cleaner, the timing different.
I liked the the "old Taylor" much more, certainly within the Stones framework.
There are some moments when he's "back there", albeit shortly. We should treasure those moments.
Yes, we cannot turn back the clock, just play those old bootlegs.
I wonder what made him change his style, he was a born "genuine fluid" blues player. Like he's been brainwashed or something.
My guess is that, after the "prog-flirt" with Jack Bruce, he really tried to get back to the pure (unfortunately imo "white boy") blues. Throughout the "wrong" decade (the 80s) his sound and style developed in a slightly "sterile" way.
Since he's been playing within that framework for 30 years now, it might be kinda hard to break out of?
Just a theory...
Well, his style and fluidity with Dylan, maybe his best as a lead player imo, and the things he did in the mid 9-tees-I saw him then- reminds me a lot of his Mayall and Stones days, quite similar actually.. The change came later, to my ears.
Yeah, definitely agree about the Dylan-gigs. It's not black and white.
Then again, you can hear hints of the change already on his debut album, imo.
Quote
WeLoveYouQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
VT22Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
VT22Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
VT22
No, he's not. However, I've always found Taylor's playing good, but he has indeed developed a different style, playing very often without a pick. The runs are shorter, his sense of timing is different and the sound is cleaner.
I've seen him live three times before, and he always played well - no matter how the show was. However, none of those gigs showed the Taylor we know from the 70s.[DP]
Yes, I agree, the runs a shorter, the sound is cleaner, the timing different.
I liked the the "old Taylor" much more, certainly within the Stones framework.
There are some moments when he's "back there", albeit shortly. We should treasure those moments.
Yes, we cannot turn back the clock, just play those old bootlegs.
I wonder what made him change his style, he was a born "genuine fluid" blues player. Like he's been brainwashed or something.
My guess is that, after the "prog-flirt" with Jack Bruce, he really tried to get back to the pure (unfortunately imo "white boy") blues. Throughout the "wrong" decade (the 80s) his sound and style developed in a slightly "sterile" way.
Since he's been playing within that framework for 30 years now, it might be kinda hard to break out of?
Just a theory...
Well, his style and fluidity with Dylan, maybe his best as a lead player imo, and the things he did in the mid 9-tees-I saw him then- reminds me a lot of his Mayall and Stones days, quite similar actually.. The change came later, to my ears.
Yeah, definitely agree about the Dylan-gigs. It's not black and white.
Then again, you can hear hints of the change already on his debut album, imo.
Interesting comments. I would go further and say that Mick T sounded better in 1969 than the later Stones years. There's something about his playing in 1969, listen to the verse guitar fills in HTW (Ya-Yas version), also various licks on I'm Free (deluxe Ya-Yas). There was a youthful magic to his playing in the early days. Also listen to the later Mayall albums he played on.
Quote
RokyfanQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
kleermaker
I agree that Taylor's playing during those 25 and 29 November concerts differs from his playing during the early 70ties with the Stones. It's less fluid and soaring, it's shorter and the notes are more 'separated' from each other. I too prefer his 70ties style with the Stones. Still, his playing added something extra the Stones miss painfully as a band. Keith and Ronnie don't offer that special excitement that Taylor's playing does, even if it's not as 'fantastic' as it used to be during the 69-74 epoque.
It was much more exciting than anyone could dream of prior to the shows.
Good to see you back, kleermaker!
PS: It was Taylor's first gig since 1981 with the Stones. Let's give him time, I'm sure he will work some wonderment out
What do you mean give him time, there are three gigs left and nobody even knows if he is coming to those.
Quote
angee
I don't know. I just hope at least Mick Taylor shows up in the US.
I think that was an impetus, with possibly Bill for a number of people buying tickets to one or more shows.