Tell Me :
Talk
Who ?
At least it's an expensive ending...that's something, at least
They always are... they always are.
And LondonStreetKidsStonesRule and of course, Colonial.
Went out on top. Didn't want to take a chance of overstaying their welcome!
but it's not even clear whether there's a next year
Thank you for that wonderful segue senor stonestod:
[www.iorr.org]
I think we need to lobby BV to make this a permanent emoticon.
can someone elongate the tongue first?
IORR calling Schillid, come in Schillid...
Perfectly stated.
actually there were a couple of grammatical mistakes there. but if he resubmits with corrections by noon tomorrow, we'll reconsider his final grade.
"Twenty years of work, thirty years of hanging around..."
Hey look, I'm getting under Justin's skin again.
Dude, you've obvioulsy been thinking about things I've posted here. Maybe it's a sign that maybe you and the more blind cheerleader fanboys are waking the f$%& up about this band that is losing fans daily and deservedly.
[thepowergoats.com]
Steel toes should be included.
At the end of the day, are you better off with or without the Stones being (some what) active? If your not the so called "true" fan and wish they hung it up ages ago, then why in the world would you care if they did not follow your recommendation? You got your fill while they were on top, is there anything more you want?
You state that they should cancel these shows and then you state you wouldn't if you were them!
And how do you know the Beatles went out on top? The top to many ended in 66/67 and the top may have been in the mid 70's if they continued.
I'm not interested in perfect grammar (darryl jones), I'm interested in emotion (Bill Wyman). God, StonesTod, I just made myself throw up in my own mouth.
Talk about your favorite band.
For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Re: This Isn't Ending Well.
Posted by:
LERIFFHUMAIN
()
Date: October 21, 2012 12:42
perhaps a short european tour??? i hope
Re: This Isn't Ending Well.
Posted by:
Virtual_Nobody
()
Date: October 21, 2012 13:13
"TWo decades of creating the legacy, three decades celebrating the legacy, and finally 4 concerts to cash in on the legay... That's the 50 years of The Rolling Stones as it is.
Ä slight modification of the great line from Stonesnow
Ä slight modification of the great line from Stonesnow
Re: This Isn't Ending Well.
Posted by:
Edith Grove
()
Date: October 21, 2012 15:43
Quote
Bliss
Stonescrow, thewatchman, MightyStonesRollin...whatever happened to them or him?
Who ?
-
Posted by:
Max'sKansasCity
()
Date: October 21, 2012 16:00
.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-10-22 02:52 by Max'sKansasCity.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-10-22 02:52 by Max'sKansasCity.
Re: This Isn't Ending Well.
Posted by:
Erik_Snow
()
Date: October 21, 2012 16:04
Quote
Max'sKansasCity
so..... no happy ending?
At least it's an expensive ending...that's something, at least
Re: This Isn't Ending Well.
Posted by:
Max'sKansasCity
()
Date: October 21, 2012 16:05
Quote
Erik_SnowQuote
Max'sKansasCity
so..... no happy ending?
At least it's an expensive ending......
They always are... they always are.
Re: This Isn't Ending Well.
Posted by:
treaclefingers
()
Date: October 21, 2012 16:12
Quote
Edith GroveQuote
Bliss
Stonescrow, thewatchman, MightyStonesRollin...whatever happened to them or him?
Who ?
And LondonStreetKidsStonesRule and of course, Colonial.
Re: This Isn't Ending Well.
Posted by:
2000 LYFH
()
Date: October 21, 2012 17:06
Quote
Bliss
Stonescrow, thewatchman, MightyStonesRollin...whatever happened to them or him?
Went out on top. Didn't want to take a chance of overstaying their welcome!
Re: This Isn't Ending Well.
Posted by:
StonesTod
()
Date: October 21, 2012 17:13
Quote
hbwriter
*there is a tour next year*
but it's not even clear whether there's a next year
Re: This Isn't Ending Well.
Posted by:
treaclefingers
()
Date: October 21, 2012 17:22
Quote
StonesTodQuote
hbwriter
*there is a tour next year*
but it's not even clear whether there's a next year
Thank you for that wonderful segue senor stonestod:
[www.iorr.org]
Re: This Isn't Ending Well.
Posted by:
StonesTod
()
Date: October 21, 2012 17:26
mhm. first we need verification of the year, then for the tour....let's not put the cart before the warhorse...or something
Re: This Isn't Ending Well.
Posted by:
Max'sKansasCity
()
Date: October 21, 2012 17:28
How are people supposed to stay all doom and gloomy
and sad and bitchy if you guys keep making us laugh so much? DAMN IT!
and sad and bitchy if you guys keep making us laugh so much? DAMN IT!
Re: This Isn't Ending Well.
Posted by:
Max'sKansasCity
()
Date: October 21, 2012 17:29
cart before the warhorse.... 
Re: This Isn't Ending Well.
Posted by:
treaclefingers
()
Date: October 21, 2012 17:31
Quote
Max'sKansasCity
cart before the warhorse....
I think we need to lobby BV to make this a permanent emoticon.
Re: This Isn't Ending Well.
Posted by:
Max'sKansasCity
()
Date: October 21, 2012 17:32
Seconded!Quote
treaclefingersQuote
Max'sKansasCity
cart before the warhorse....
I think we need to lobby BV to make this a permanent emoticon.
Re: This Isn't Ending Well.
Posted by:
StonesTod
()
Date: October 21, 2012 17:41
Quote
Max'sKansasCitySeconded!Quote
treaclefingersQuote
Max'sKansasCity
cart before the warhorse....
I think we need to lobby BV to make this a permanent emoticon.
can someone elongate the tongue first?
Re: This Isn't Ending Well.
Posted by:
treaclefingers
()
Date: October 21, 2012 17:42
Quote
StonesTodQuote
Max'sKansasCitySeconded!Quote
treaclefingersQuote
Max'sKansasCity
cart before the warhorse....
I think we need to lobby BV to make this a permanent emoticon.
can someone elongate the tongue first?
IORR calling Schillid, come in Schillid...
Re: This Isn't Ending Well.
Posted by:
jazzbass
()
Date: October 21, 2012 17:58
Quote
24FPS
This is ending wonderfully. The vaults are wide open. I can spend $44.95 the evening of December 15th and not have to travel to New Jersey. The official boots alone have been fantastic. The Houston '78 show on DVD. Man, it's been nothing but heaven for 'true' Rolling Stones fan. Bill freakin' Wyman on stage with the boys. Thank god the Stones didn't abandon us in 1970 like the Finicky Four did.
Perfectly stated.
Re: This Isn't Ending Well.
Posted by:
StonesTod
()
Date: October 21, 2012 18:01
Quote
jazzbassQuote
24FPS
This is ending wonderfully. The vaults are wide open. I can spend $44.95 the evening of December 15th and not have to travel to New Jersey. The official boots alone have been fantastic. The Houston '78 show on DVD. Man, it's been nothing but heaven for 'true' Rolling Stones fan. Bill freakin' Wyman on stage with the boys. Thank god the Stones didn't abandon us in 1970 like the Finicky Four did.
Perfectly stated.
actually there were a couple of grammatical mistakes there. but if he resubmits with corrections by noon tomorrow, we'll reconsider his final grade.
Re: This Isn't Ending Well.
Posted by:
Naturalust
()
Date: October 21, 2012 18:07
It's just a reflection of the state of the music biz and the greedy society we live in, imho. Blame Napster or something...
Ain't no shortcut to the Bodhisattva, only burn your flashlight out - Willy Porter
peace
Ain't no shortcut to the Bodhisattva, only burn your flashlight out - Willy Porter
peace
Re: This Isn't Ending Well.
Posted by:
Midnight Toker
()
Date: October 21, 2012 18:16
Doom and Gloom tells me that that can still rock. The makings of a fine new recording but I don't think the realy care anymore. Otherwise, we would have a new CD on the shelves rather than the millionth greatest hits package. Been there done that again and again .If they want my money, gimme some that hasn't been recycled over and over again.
Re: This Isn't Ending Well.
Posted by:
robv
()
Date: October 21, 2012 18:30
To paraphrase Charlie:Quote
His MajestyQuote
DoxaQuote
Come On
"TWo decades of creating the legacy, three decades celebrating the legacy"... That's the 50 years of The Rolling Stones as it is.Yup! That's how it is...
That's a line of stonesnow - credits to him!
- Doxa
Great line!
"Twenty years of work, thirty years of hanging around..."
Re: This Isn't Ending Well.
Posted by:
jamesfdouglas
()
Date: October 21, 2012 18:49
Quote
Justin
Whoa, careful vermontoffender! jamesfdouglas and the rest of his hot-headed foot soldiers will start ranting and hollering (and snickering) at all of us for bringing up logical and balanced rationale!
Hey look, I'm getting under Justin's skin again.
Dude, you've obvioulsy been thinking about things I've posted here. Maybe it's a sign that maybe you and the more blind cheerleader fanboys are waking the f$%& up about this band that is losing fans daily and deservedly.
[thepowergoats.com]
.
Posted by:
Max'sKansasCity
()
Date: October 21, 2012 19:00
.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-10-22 02:48 by Max'sKansasCity.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-10-22 02:48 by Max'sKansasCity.
Re: WR: This Isn't Ending Well.
Posted by:
Edith Grove
()
Date: October 21, 2012 19:03
Quote
Max'sKansasCity
Oh brother you guys, it is getting deep in here.
We may need another warning abbreviation in addition to OT-Off Topic.
WR-Wellies Required
Steel toes should be included.
Re: This Isn't Ending Well.
Posted by:
paulm
()
Date: October 21, 2012 19:05
Don't fret jamesfdouglas. Justin is very clever with words: "logical and balanced rationale" = his agenda. I would guess J is a lawyer, academician, state, gov't or non-profit employee (I'm a part time academician, so tuned in to this transparent rhetoric). We all vote where our bread is buttered, including Justin. However, even J's side is waking up to his sponsor's policies regarding things hard won, historically speaking.
Re: This Isn't Ending Well.
Posted by:
2000 LYFH
()
Date: October 21, 2012 19:29
Quote
paulm
The Beatles went out in the ultimate mythology. Many wished they hung together, like the Stones managed to do. But one thing you can say: Beatles went out on top.
The Stones had a longer run, and a GREAT post-Beatles run (IMO the Stones' BEST run 1969-1973), but the problem with that longevity is that they are overstaying their welcome, turning into a box-settin', jacked ticket pricin', phone-it-in image act.
I am happy for the personal lives of the Stones: Keith's Patti and Charlie enduring through cancer just like my parents have; they are survivors. Their "appearance" alone is almost worth the price of admission. But artistically, culturally (and politically), it is a BIG letdown. I would rather they cancel these shows than continue down this road. Sure, they will line the coffers for their subsequent generations, and in that respect I guess I would be doing the SAME thing honestly.
But don't expect a discriminating fan to BUY IN.
At the end of the day, are you better off with or without the Stones being (some what) active? If your not the so called "true" fan and wish they hung it up ages ago, then why in the world would you care if they did not follow your recommendation? You got your fill while they were on top, is there anything more you want?
You state that they should cancel these shows and then you state you wouldn't if you were them!
And how do you know the Beatles went out on top? The top to many ended in 66/67 and the top may have been in the mid 70's if they continued.
Re: This Isn't Ending Well.
Posted by:
drbryant
()
Date: October 21, 2012 19:35
Well, I would hope that a guy who names himself paulm believes that the Beatles went out on top unlike the Stones! Mark Chapman (did he ever call himself johnl?) probably thinks the same.
Re: This Isn't Ending Well.
Posted by:
24FPS
()
Date: October 21, 2012 19:37
Quote
StonesTodQuote
jazzbassQuote
24FPS
This is ending wonderfully. The vaults are wide open. I can spend $44.95 the evening of December 15th and not have to travel to New Jersey. The official boots alone have been fantastic. The Houston '78 show on DVD. Man, it's been nothing but heaven for 'true' Rolling Stones fan. Bill freakin' Wyman on stage with the boys. Thank god the Stones didn't abandon us in 1970 like the Finicky Four did.
Perfectly stated.
actually there were a couple of grammatical mistakes there. but if he resubmits with corrections by noon tomorrow, we'll reconsider his final grade.
I'm not interested in perfect grammar (darryl jones), I'm interested in emotion (Bill Wyman). God, StonesTod, I just made myself throw up in my own mouth.
Re: This Isn't Ending Well.
Posted by:
paulm
()
Date: October 21, 2012 19:38
You bring up a couple good points LYFH:
1) So the question for us having a problem with the Stones is: would we act any differently if we were THEM? For myself, I would take the cash, but I would not be allying myself with socialist agendas. That, to me, is a crock of S. Own up to your own f'ing greed; I would respect that!
2) The Beatles did go out (a) top; they had many tops, just as the Stones DID.
Quote
2000 LYFH
You state that they should cancel these shows and then you state you wouldn't if you were them!
And how do you know the Beatles went out on top? The top to many ended in 66/67 and the top may have been in the mid 70's if they continued.
1) So the question for us having a problem with the Stones is: would we act any differently if we were THEM? For myself, I would take the cash, but I would not be allying myself with socialist agendas. That, to me, is a crock of S. Own up to your own f'ing greed; I would respect that!
2) The Beatles did go out (a) top; they had many tops, just as the Stones DID.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Online Users
Guests:
1845
Record Number of Users:
206
on June 1, 2022 23:50
Record Number of Guests:
9627
on January 2, 2024 23:10