Tell Me :
Talk
Good lord that is awful.
Still, only $6.99
thr u gonna go now...get uhm on outta here...GO!
obviously my subtley was lost on you.
You did make me laff by going political though. I have to hand it to you Mitch, I likes your humour!
Even with the 'get back to your roots' thing, The Beatles did it before The Rolling Stones...
January 1968.
February 1968.
As for no side musicians, there's a session and/or guest musician on just about every stones track from 1968 - 1972.
You got a point, but imo they were on their way already. Paint It Black was also recorded round this time, Going Home was outside the box as well and Lady Jane/I Am Waiting were very mature efforts.
There are a couple of clunkers on Revolver as well. Dr. Robert comes to mind.
I can't help enjoying What To Do, in all its stupidity
You're not gonna recruit a lot of new Beatles-fans with that one
Sometimes there is thrown sand in the machinery, but eventually you're right - it will go on and on and on and on...
She also loves the jonas brothers.
[en.wikipedia.org]
"To date The Beatles record sales are over 1 billion units worldwide."
What about concert tickets?
Whilst both bands were actIvley touring during same period?
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-08-30 15:17 by His Majesty.
LOL.
Now come on Come On, that's a great song. We should all be so lucky next time we go to the dentist!
If you're down he'll pick you up
Doctor Robert
Take a drink from his special cup
Doctor Robert
When you need some good drugs, that is
Talk about your favorite band.
For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
mitchflorida1
()
Date: August 30, 2012 01:13
If you are a Beatles fan, you have to listen to this album. Some of the tracks are better than the original Beatles versions. And you can understand the lyrics for the very first time!
[www.amazon.com]
[www.amazon.com]
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
treaclefingers
()
Date: August 30, 2012 01:18
Quote
mitchflorida1
If you are a Beatles fan, you have to listen to this album. Some of the tracks are better than the original Beatles versions. And you can understand the lyrics for the very first time!
[www.amazon.com]
Good lord that is awful.
Still, only $6.99
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
mitchflorida1
()
Date: August 30, 2012 01:41
It is jazzy, so it would appeal to more sophisticated tastes. Your best bet is to stick with Louie, Louie by the Kingsmen.
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
treaclefingers
()
Date: August 30, 2012 01:43
Quote
mitchflorida1
It is jazzy, so it would appeal to more sophisticated tastes. Your best bet is to stick with Louie, Louie by the Kingsmen.
thr u gonna go now...get uhm on outta here...GO!
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
mitchflorida1
()
Date: August 30, 2012 02:10
huh? you're just angry cause Obama gonna lose
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
treaclefingers
()
Date: August 30, 2012 02:12
Quote
mitchflorida1
huh? you're just angry cause Obama gonna lose
obviously my subtley was lost on you.
You did make me laff by going political though. I have to hand it to you Mitch, I likes your humour!
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
stonesrule
()
Date: August 30, 2012 02:32
No Mitch, Obama is not going to lose.
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
His Majesty
()
Date: August 30, 2012 12:00
Quote
drbryantQuote
Come On
The truth is that Stones copied Lennon (Beatles) 1965-1967 in everything they did, everything....
Fall 1967
PM: Hey, Mick! I heard the new album, with the 3D cover. Really cool!
MJ: Oh, hi Paul. Well, you know I wanted a cover like Sgt. Pepper, except even better! And we're the Satanic Majesties, like the Lonely Hearts Club Band.
PM: [smiles] That was MY idea, man! Our next album will be better! It's a magical, mystery album. We'll be in disguise and it won't have any rock on it because it will be mostly psychedelic pop, with strings and horns - Hardly any guitars, man! It'll be groovy!
MJ: I dig, man. I wish I could do that too!!
PM: [puzzled] Why don't you?
MJ: Well, Keith says that we should stop following what you guys do, because it's all crap. Him and Stu - they want to go back to making "basic" rock records - they say it's what we do best.
PM: Man, those guys just do not get it, do they?
MJ: In fact, Keith wants to get rid of the extra musicians and just play guitars, bass and drums!
PM: [frowns] Man, our next single is the exact opposite, man. It's a song about how all we need is L-O-V-E, luv, man! We'll be using a complete orchestra in the studio, and we'll record it live for television broadcast around the world - it's complex, man - it's like 4/4, then 3/4, then 4/4, then 3/4! The introduction is horns playing "La Marseillaise"!!
MJ: [excited] Whoaa! [*sighs*] Keith wants our next single to be this bluesy song with a straight guitar intro - it's called Jumping Jack Flash.
PM: "Jack Flash"? Are you serious? Doesn't exactly sound like a global message, man.
MJ: [looks downward] I know, man, I know . . . . .
Even with the 'get back to your roots' thing, The Beatles did it before The Rolling Stones...
January 1968.
February 1968.
As for no side musicians, there's a session and/or guest musician on just about every stones track from 1968 - 1972.
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
whitem8
()
Date: August 30, 2012 13:30
wow mitch, really can't how you would think any of that music is better than the original. Sounds like muzak jazz.
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
DandelionPowderman
()
Date: August 30, 2012 13:58
Quote
Big AlQuote
DandelionPowderman
Revolver and Aftermath? Two fantastic albums by two fantastic bands
Yes, two fantastic bands, but where as Revolver contains such far-out moments as Tomorrow Never Knows, the overlong Aftermath contains pap like What To Do - a likeable enough song, but something reminiscent of a circa-1963 Lennon/McCartney effort. I adore the Stones, but the Beatles were light years ahead untill Jagger/Richards started to really focus on the long player and their teaming up with Jimmy Miller.
You got a point, but imo they were on their way already. Paint It Black was also recorded round this time, Going Home was outside the box as well and Lady Jane/I Am Waiting were very mature efforts.
There are a couple of clunkers on Revolver as well. Dr. Robert comes to mind.
I can't help enjoying What To Do, in all its stupidity
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
drbryant
()
Date: August 30, 2012 14:12
Jessica says Stones
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
Come On
()
Date: August 30, 2012 14:23
I just wanna present a clunker:
2 1 2 0
2 1 2 0
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
DandelionPowderman
()
Date: August 30, 2012 14:27
Quote
Come On
I just wanna present a clunker:
You're not gonna recruit a lot of new Beatles-fans with that one
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
Stoneage
()
Date: August 30, 2012 14:28
This thread is a perpetual motion machine, greased by its own stupidity.
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
DandelionPowderman
()
Date: August 30, 2012 14:34
Quote
Stoneage
This thread is a perpetual motion machine, greased by its own stupidity.
Sometimes there is thrown sand in the machinery, but eventually you're right - it will go on and on and on and on...
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
His Majesty
()
Date: August 30, 2012 14:37
Quote
drbryant
Jessica says Stones
She also loves the jonas brothers.
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
drbryant
()
Date: August 30, 2012 14:43
"BEATLES!"
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
His Majesty
()
Date: August 30, 2012 15:01
Quote
drbryant
"BEATLES!"
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
Come On
()
Date: August 30, 2012 15:05
-Hey, we got our fans straigth....
2 1 2 0
2 1 2 0
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
His Majesty
()
Date: August 30, 2012 15:07
Quote
Come On
-Hey, we got our fans straigth....
[en.wikipedia.org]
"To date The Beatles record sales are over 1 billion units worldwide."
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
DandelionPowderman
()
Date: August 30, 2012 15:11
Quote
His MajestyQuote
Come On
-Hey, we got our fans straigth....
[en.wikipedia.org]
"To date The Beatles record sales are over 1 billion units worldwide."
What about concert tickets?
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
Come On
()
Date: August 30, 2012 15:12
I thought 9.000.000 was the number of Swedish Fans....
2 1 2 0
2 1 2 0
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
His Majesty
()
Date: August 30, 2012 15:14
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
His MajestyQuote
Come On
-Hey, we got our fans straigth....
[en.wikipedia.org]
"To date The Beatles record sales are over 1 billion units worldwide."
What about concert tickets?
Whilst both bands were actIvley touring during same period?
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-08-30 15:17 by His Majesty.
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
DandelionPowderman
()
Date: August 30, 2012 15:16
Nope, in total - that's what matters ><
<Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
His Majesty
()
Date: August 30, 2012 15:17
Quote
DandelionPowderman
Nope, in total - that's what matters >
LOL.
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
DandelionPowderman
()
Date: August 30, 2012 15:20
You see how desperate one has to be to find something the Stones was/is better at
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
drbryant
()
Date: August 30, 2012 15:56
Alicia says the Stones.
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
Max'sKansasCity
()
Date: August 30, 2012 16:05
So does Drew...
and this isnt her slumming on the street...
this is from her interview Inside the ActorsStudio
and this isnt her slumming on the street...
this is from her interview Inside the ActorsStudio
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
2000 LYFH
()
Date: August 30, 2012 16:10
Quote
Come On
I just wanna present a clunker:
Now come on Come On, that's a great song. We should all be so lucky next time we go to the dentist!
If you're down he'll pick you up
Doctor Robert
Take a drink from his special cup
Doctor Robert
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
DandelionPowderman
()
Date: August 30, 2012 16:22
Quote
2000 LYFHQuote
Come On
I just wanna present a clunker:
Now come on Come On, that's a great song. We should all be so lucky next time we go to the dentist!
If you're down he'll pick you up
Doctor Robert
Take a drink from his special cup
Doctor Robert
When you need some good drugs, that is
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Online Users
babyblue , FeelslikeaGhost , frtylicks , holsten , IGTBA , MisterDDDD , NedKellyBandit , RollingStonesFan
Guests:
1834
Record Number of Users:
206
on June 1, 2022 23:50
Record Number of Guests:
9627
on January 2, 2024 23:10