Tell Me :
Talk
So? I'd rather have the young Marianne Faithfull or Anita Pallenberg than any of those chicks.
...or at least much prettier..
2 1 2 0
You would! Well your not getting them.
I don't think that is correct. It was rather common ground for more bands for a certain period of time, to some extent. A short and magic period in the history of rock. And has for instance "THEIR SATANIC MAJESTIES' REQUEST" that much likeness with "SERGEANT PEPPER'S" when you look closer into it?
To take one track only, "2000 Light Years from Home". I am not sure and, please, correct me if I am wrong, however, I think I have read some time that it was not a copy in any sense, but inspired by a track not at all from the Beatles, but rather from the Byrds, featured in their fourth album "YOUNGER THAN YESTERDAY". That is the track describing an abduction into outer space by creatures from there in a foreign space ship. The track is "C.T.A.-102", and you might listen to it here
[www.youtube.com]
Even Jimi Hendrix shows an expression of a similiar theme at the outset of "AXIS: BOLD AS LOVE".
Well then?
Tintin to Mickey Mouse? BV to Gazza? The Pope to mother Theresa? Gazza to the pope? Popeye to the Pope?
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-09-02 20:13 by Erik_Snow.
Be careful what you wish for...
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-09-03 08:02 by 71Tele.
200 years from now the Chinese will rule the world. Only the Stones will be remembered. Bitch will be declared the greatest song ever.
ROCKMAN
what about - "Why Don't We Do It In The Road" and "The Inner Light"?
No, they're will be down there with 'Stoned' and 'Star Star'....
Yeah, King Crimson were the best live band ever.
Ever heard of the Sonics?
Hilarious!
Talk about your favorite band.
For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
Blue
()
Date: September 1, 2012 04:36
The Beatles came first and most everyone just loved their refreshing sound, then along came the Stones with a bit of a rawer, "dirtier" sound, and many were drawn in by their audacity, it really, really IS a matter of taste in the end, loved the Beatles up until Revolver, but then they changed into more druggier and more depressing music, and Stones played druggy and depressing so much better IMHO..of course, we all have our favorite Beatles period and favorite Stones period as well simply dependent on one's taste in music..
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
JJackFl
()
Date: September 1, 2012 11:22
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
folke
()
Date: September 1, 2012 14:56
Quote
2000 LYFHQuote
folke
The Rolling Stones had better girlfriends and wives.
Layla
The beautiful Olivia Trinidad Arias
So? I'd rather have the young Marianne Faithfull or Anita Pallenberg than any of those chicks.
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
Come On
()
Date: September 1, 2012 15:49
Quote
folke
The Rolling Stones had better girlfriends and wives.
...or at least much prettier..
2 1 2 0
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
schillid
()
Date: September 1, 2012 17:44
The Rolling Stones are great and have been around longer...
The Stones are past their prime... And...
The Beatles were better... okay? Happy?
The Stones are past their prime... And...
The Beatles were better... okay? Happy?
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
2000 LYFH
()
Date: September 1, 2012 20:52
Quote
folkeQuote
2000 LYFHQuote
folke
The Rolling Stones had better girlfriends and wives.
Layla
The beautiful Olivia Trinidad Arias
So? I'd rather have the young Marianne Faithfull or Anita Pallenberg than any of those chicks.
You would! Well your not getting them.
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
Witness
()
Date: September 1, 2012 21:28
Quote
Come On
The truth is that Stones copied Lennon (Beatles) 1965-1967 in everything they did, everything....
I don't think that is correct. It was rather common ground for more bands for a certain period of time, to some extent. A short and magic period in the history of rock. And has for instance "THEIR SATANIC MAJESTIES' REQUEST" that much likeness with "SERGEANT PEPPER'S" when you look closer into it?
To take one track only, "2000 Light Years from Home". I am not sure and, please, correct me if I am wrong, however, I think I have read some time that it was not a copy in any sense, but inspired by a track not at all from the Beatles, but rather from the Byrds, featured in their fourth album "YOUNGER THAN YESTERDAY". That is the track describing an abduction into outer space by creatures from there in a foreign space ship. The track is "C.T.A.-102", and you might listen to it here
[www.youtube.com]
Even Jimi Hendrix shows an expression of a similiar theme at the outset of "AXIS: BOLD AS LOVE".
Well then?
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
Come On
()
Date: September 2, 2012 19:03
Quote
WitnessQuote
Come On
The truth is that Stones copied Lennon (Beatles) 1965-1967 in everything they did, everything....
I don't think that is correct. It was rather common ground for more bands for a certain period of time, to some extent. A short and magic period in the history of rock. And has for instance "THEIR SATANIC MAJESTIES' REQUEST" that much likeness with "SERGEANT PEPPER'S" when you look closer into it?
To take one track only, "2000 Light Years from Home". I am not sure and, please, correct me if I am wrong, however, I think I have read some time that it was not a copy in any sense, but inspired by a track not at all from the Beatles, but rather from the Byrds, featured in their fourth album "YOUNGER THAN YESTERDAY". That is the track describing an abduction into outer space by creatures from there in a foreign space ship. The track is "C.T.A.-102", and you might listen to it here
[www.youtube.com]
Even Jimi Hendrix shows an expression of a similiar theme at the outset of "AXIS: BOLD AS LOVE".
Well then?
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
phd
()
Date: September 2, 2012 19:28
Do you prefer Mozart to Bach ? Beethoven to Schubert ? Chopin to Debussy ?
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
Erik_Snow
()
Date: September 2, 2012 20:08
Quote
phd
Do you prefer Mozart to Bach ? Beethoven to Schubert ? Chopin to Debussy ?
Tintin to Mickey Mouse? BV to Gazza? The Pope to mother Theresa? Gazza to the pope? Popeye to the Pope?
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-09-02 20:13 by Erik_Snow.
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
doubledoor
()
Date: September 3, 2012 07:18
On a Beatles fan site maybe, (but probably not). On a Stones site The Stones are miles ahead.(unless it is this site)
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
71Tele
()
Date: September 3, 2012 08:00
Quote
folke
So? I'd rather have the young Marianne Faithfull or Anita Pallenberg than any of those chicks.
Be careful what you wish for...
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-09-03 08:02 by 71Tele.
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
Rockman
()
Date: September 3, 2012 08:03
If it helps Erik ...Pope made a pretty good motor-mower....
ROCKMAN
ROCKMAN
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
MightyStonesStillRollin50
()
Date: September 3, 2012 08:04
A year or so from now the Stones will have put the Beatles in their rear view mirror! Yeah, baby!
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
Come On
()
Date: September 3, 2012 08:41
My guess is that in 200 years will only find 'Satisfaction', 'Yesterday', 'Hey Jude', and 'Let it be' in the history books on music from the 1960s...
3 - 1 to The Beatles....
2 1 2 0
3 - 1 to The Beatles....
2 1 2 0
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
MightyStonesStillRollin50
()
Date: September 3, 2012 08:48
Quote
Come On
My guess is that in 200 years will only find 'Satisfaction', 'Yesterday', 'Hey Jude', and 'Let it be' in the history books on music from the 1960s...
3 - 1 to The Beatles....
200 years from now the Chinese will rule the world. Only the Stones will be remembered. Bitch will be declared the greatest song ever.
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
Rockman
()
Date: September 3, 2012 09:14
ROCKMAN
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
GravityBoy
()
Date: September 3, 2012 09:24
I'm sick of this.
I want to see a "The Children of the Beatles better than the Children of the Stones" thread.
I want to see a "The Children of the Beatles better than the Children of the Stones" thread.
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
folke
()
Date: September 3, 2012 10:16
Bob Dylan is better than both those bands anyway. Yes, he's better! Better!
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
Come On
()
Date: September 3, 2012 10:18
Agreed!
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
2000 LYFH
()
Date: September 3, 2012 16:02
Quote
Come On
My guess is that in 200 years will only find 'Satisfaction', 'Yesterday', 'Hey Jude', and 'Let it be' in the history books on music from the 1960s...
3 - 1 to The Beatles....
what about - "Why Don't We Do It In The Road" and "The Inner Light"?
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
Come On
()
Date: September 3, 2012 16:15
Quote
2000 LYFHQuote
Come On
My guess is that in 200 years will only find 'Satisfaction', 'Yesterday', 'Hey Jude', and 'Let it be' in the history books on music from the 1960s...
3 - 1 to The Beatles....
what about - "Why Don't We Do It In The Road" and "The Inner Light"?
No, they're will be down there with 'Stoned' and 'Star Star'....
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
slew
()
Date: September 3, 2012 21:18
I can live with Beatles as best recoording band ever. Live is another story.
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
emotionalbarbecue
()
Date: September 4, 2012 01:33
Hey....you know...some people are still bashing the Stones in a Stones fan forum and they are also prasing other bands or musicians instead....what is the best thing to do????
Well.....GET OUT OF THIS THREAD......JUMP!!!!!!!!!!!
Well.....GET OUT OF THIS THREAD......JUMP!!!!!!!!!!!
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
His Majesty
()
Date: September 4, 2012 01:36
Quote
slew
I can live with Beatles as best recoording band ever. Live is another story.
Yeah, King Crimson were the best live band ever.
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
slew
()
Date: September 4, 2012 01:41
His Majesty - I can not comment I never saw them.
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
slew
()
Date: September 4, 2012 01:48
I was just looking at some on-line pics of Anita and Marianne and they were gorgeous back in the day! However like their men they have not aged well in the looks department especially Anita
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
rbarnes00
()
Date: September 4, 2012 06:19
[www.amazon.com]
How The Beatles Destroyed Rock 'n' Roll: An Alternative History of American Popular Music (Paperback)
Elijah Wald
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-09-04 06:20 by rbarnes00.
How The Beatles Destroyed Rock 'n' Roll: An Alternative History of American Popular Music (Paperback)
Elijah Wald
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-09-04 06:20 by rbarnes00.
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
MightyStonesStillRollin50
()
Date: September 4, 2012 06:37
Quote
His MajestyQuote
slew
I can live with Beatles as best recoording band ever. Live is another story.
Yeah, King Crimson were the best live band ever.
Ever heard of the Sonics?
Re: The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones
Posted by:
MightyStonesStillRollin50
()
Date: September 4, 2012 07:24
Quote
emotionalbarbecue
Hey....you know...some people are still bashing the Stones in a Stones fan forum and they are also prasing other bands or musicians instead....what is the best thing to do????
Well.....GET OUT OF THIS THREAD......JUMP!!!!!!!!!!!
Hilarious!
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Online Users
Andrea82 , blivet , drwatts , eduardoacdc , EggersBand , harjen , hot stuff , makemeburnthecandle , matthijst , Maya0104 , mike567 , NeddieFlanders , NoPanic , resotele , spunky , UGK56
Guests:
1396
Record Number of Users:
206
on June 1, 2022 23:50
Record Number of Guests:
9627
on January 2, 2024 23:10