For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
kleermakerQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
VT22Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
VT22
magee mineko
The right channel of Loving Cup is Taylor.
The guitar phrase of 2:24~2:32 resembles Taylor of "I'm Free" ['69 live] .
The vibrato of 2:53~2:57 is Taylor's characteristic. It is not Keith.
[Because I am a Japanese, I am poor at English.
I cannot explain well. I'm sorry.
Thanks for the effort.
Listening to the stones without Mick Taylor is like watching tv in black & white to me.
So, if you find out that Loving Cup is indeed without Taylor, it all of a sudden turns into a bad song...?
Not at all. It's a good song. I always knew loving cup is probably without Taylor, that's why I said: 'thanks for the effort'.
Most Jones era footage is in black and white, and the Wood era sounds like grayscale to me
And Brown Sugar, where Taylor is inaudible? A little more colorful?
I've always said that BS as a studio version is boring BS, but great when performed live during the 71-73 years. So the song in itself must be great.
Quote
His MajestyQuote
Mathijs
You think so? It's that SG through HiWatt amp to me, quite the same as HTW.
Mathijs
Are you high?
Taylors tone is clean on 1969 Loving Cup, not clean on Honky Tonk.
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
kleermakerQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
VT22
magee mineko
The right channel of Loving Cup is Taylor.
The guitar phrase of 2:24~2:32 resembles Taylor of "I'm Free" ['69 live] .
The vibrato of 2:53~2:57 is Taylor's characteristic. It is not Keith.
[Because I am a Japanese, I am poor at English.
I cannot explain well. I'm sorry.
Thanks for the effort.
Listening to the stones without Mick Taylor is like watching tv in black & white to me.
So, if you find out that Loving Cup is indeed without Taylor, it all of a sudden turns into a bad song...?
We'll never find out
Not as long as people like yourself wants Taylor to be on the track
Honestly, I´m surprised that people say that the rhythm guitar playing on LC is his style. Even when he plays something similar (like the rhythm on CYHMK) it sounds so different.
Quote
MathijsQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
kleermakerQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
VT22
magee mineko
The right channel of Loving Cup is Taylor.
The guitar phrase of 2:24~2:32 resembles Taylor of "I'm Free" ['69 live] .
The vibrato of 2:53~2:57 is Taylor's characteristic. It is not Keith.
[Because I am a Japanese, I am poor at English.
I cannot explain well. I'm sorry.
Thanks for the effort.
Listening to the stones without Mick Taylor is like watching tv in black & white to me.
Yeah, that´s the few seconds I was talking about.
However, I´, amazed that so many people believe the rhythm guitar on the track is trademark Taylor
So, if you find out that Loving Cup is indeed without Taylor, it all of a sudden turns into a bad song...?
We'll never find out
Not as long as people like yourself wants Taylor to be on the track
Honestly, I´m surprised that people say that the rhythm guitar playing on LC is his style. Even when he plays something similar (like the rhythm on CYHMK) it sounds so different.
I really don't hear Taylor on LC, it really is all exemplary Richards. Except...the little solo line after the middle 8. That sounds quite standard pentatonic Taylor to me. I don't have headphones here at the moment so I can't hear if it's a dub or whatever, but that part sounds like it could be Taylor.
Mathijs
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
kleermakerQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
VT22Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
VT22
magee mineko
The right channel of Loving Cup is Taylor.
The guitar phrase of 2:24~2:32 resembles Taylor of "I'm Free" ['69 live] .
The vibrato of 2:53~2:57 is Taylor's characteristic. It is not Keith.
[Because I am a Japanese, I am poor at English.
I cannot explain well. I'm sorry.
Thanks for the effort.
Listening to the stones without Mick Taylor is like watching tv in black & white to me.
So, if you find out that Loving Cup is indeed without Taylor, it all of a sudden turns into a bad song...?
Not at all. It's a good song. I always knew loving cup is probably without Taylor, that's why I said: 'thanks for the effort'.
Most Jones era footage is in black and white, and the Wood era sounds like grayscale to me
And Brown Sugar, where Taylor is inaudible? A little more colorful?
I've always said that BS as a studio version is boring BS, but great when performed live during the 71-73 years. So the song in itself must be great.
Let me guess, the same goes for Gimmie Shelter, right?
Quote
kleermakerQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
kleermakerQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
VT22Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
VT22
magee mineko
The right channel of Loving Cup is Taylor.
The guitar phrase of 2:24~2:32 resembles Taylor of "I'm Free" ['69 live] .
The vibrato of 2:53~2:57 is Taylor's characteristic. It is not Keith.
[Because I am a Japanese, I am poor at English.
I cannot explain well. I'm sorry.
Thanks for the effort.
Listening to the stones without Mick Taylor is like watching tv in black & white to me.
So, if you find out that Loving Cup is indeed without Taylor, it all of a sudden turns into a bad song...?
Not at all. It's a good song. I always knew loving cup is probably without Taylor, that's why I said: 'thanks for the effort'.
Most Jones era footage is in black and white, and the Wood era sounds like grayscale to me
And Brown Sugar, where Taylor is inaudible? A little more colorful?
I've always said that BS as a studio version is boring BS, but great when performed live during the 71-73 years. So the song in itself must be great.
Let me guess, the same goes for Gimmie Shelter, right?
I find the studio version pretty boring after 1 minute, but the live versions during the 72-73 never tire.
I miss Jones and/or Taylor on most of Bleed. It's a bit sterile to me, though the songs in themselves are great as the live versions prove during the 69-73 years.
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
VT22Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
VT22
magee mineko
The right channel of Loving Cup is Taylor.
The guitar phrase of 2:24~2:32 resembles Taylor of "I'm Free" ['69 live] .
The vibrato of 2:53~2:57 is Taylor's characteristic. It is not Keith.
[Because I am a Japanese, I am poor at English.
I cannot explain well. I'm sorry.
Thanks for the effort.
Listening to the stones without Mick Taylor is like watching tv in black & white to me.
So, if you find out that Loving Cup is indeed without Taylor, it all of a sudden turns into a bad song...?
Not at all. It's a good song. I always knew loving cup is probably without Taylor, that's why I said: 'thanks for the effort'.
Most Jones era footage is in black and white, and the Wood era sounds like grayscale to me
And Brown Sugar, where Taylor is inaudible? A little more colorful?
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
kleermakerQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
kleermakerQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
VT22Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
VT22
magee mineko
The right channel of Loving Cup is Taylor.
The guitar phrase of 2:24~2:32 resembles Taylor of "I'm Free" ['69 live] .
The vibrato of 2:53~2:57 is Taylor's characteristic. It is not Keith.
[Because I am a Japanese, I am poor at English.
I cannot explain well. I'm sorry.
Thanks for the effort.
Listening to the stones without Mick Taylor is like watching tv in black & white to me.
So, if you find out that Loving Cup is indeed without Taylor, it all of a sudden turns into a bad song...?
Not at all. It's a good song. I always knew loving cup is probably without Taylor, that's why I said: 'thanks for the effort'.
Most Jones era footage is in black and white, and the Wood era sounds like grayscale to me
And Brown Sugar, where Taylor is inaudible? A little more colorful?
I've always said that BS as a studio version is boring BS, but great when performed live during the 71-73 years. So the song in itself must be great.
Let me guess, the same goes for Gimmie Shelter, right?
I find the studio version pretty boring after 1 minute, but the live versions during the 72-73 never tire.
I miss Jones and/or Taylor on most of Bleed. It's a bit sterile to me, though the songs in themselves are great as the live versions prove during the 69-73 years.
You found your God, awright
Quote
His Majesty
Rhythm & Melody.
Quote
His Majesty
Taylors guitar tone is crystal clean on Loving Cup, bluesy and driven for the lead fills on Honky Tonk... totally different sounds.
Keith is doing the bends you are focusing on, he's not dropping out for that.
But really, nevermind.
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
kleermakerQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
VT22Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
VT22
magee mineko
The right channel of Loving Cup is Taylor.
The guitar phrase of 2:24~2:32 resembles Taylor of "I'm Free" ['69 live] .
The vibrato of 2:53~2:57 is Taylor's characteristic. It is not Keith.
[Because I am a Japanese, I am poor at English.
I cannot explain well. I'm sorry.
Thanks for the effort.
Listening to the stones without Mick Taylor is like watching tv in black & white to me.
So, if you find out that Loving Cup is indeed without Taylor, it all of a sudden turns into a bad song...?
Not at all. It's a good song. I always knew loving cup is probably without Taylor, that's why I said: 'thanks for the effort'.
Most Jones era footage is in black and white, and the Wood era sounds like grayscale to me
And Brown Sugar, where Taylor is inaudible? A little more colorful?
I've always said that BS as a studio version is boring BS, but great when performed live during the 71-73 years. So the song in itself must be great.
Let me guess, the same goes for Gimmie Shelter, right?
Quote
VT22Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
VT22Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
VT22
magee mineko
The right channel of Loving Cup is Taylor.
The guitar phrase of 2:24~2:32 resembles Taylor of "I'm Free" ['69 live] .
The vibrato of 2:53~2:57 is Taylor's characteristic. It is not Keith.
[Because I am a Japanese, I am poor at English.
I cannot explain well. I'm sorry.
Thanks for the effort.
Listening to the stones without Mick Taylor is like watching tv in black & white to me.
So, if you find out that Loving Cup is indeed without Taylor, it all of a sudden turns into a bad song...?
Not at all. It's a good song. I always knew loving cup is probably without Taylor, that's why I said: 'thanks for the effort'.
Most Jones era footage is in black and white, and the Wood era sounds like grayscale to me
And Brown Sugar, where Taylor is inaudible? A little more colorful?
I do prefer the versions were Taylor is audible. He makes all songs more colorful.
I take it Keith is your favorite player, the superior guitarist within the Stones framework, reading your posts all over the years? At least you're the most competent musical poster on iorr.org.
Quote
WeLoveToPlayTheBluesQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
kleermakerQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
VT22Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
VT22
magee mineko
The right channel of Loving Cup is Taylor.
The guitar phrase of 2:24~2:32 resembles Taylor of "I'm Free" ['69 live] .
The vibrato of 2:53~2:57 is Taylor's characteristic. It is not Keith.
[Because I am a Japanese, I am poor at English.
I cannot explain well. I'm sorry.
Thanks for the effort.
Listening to the stones without Mick Taylor is like watching tv in black & white to me.
So, if you find out that Loving Cup is indeed without Taylor, it all of a sudden turns into a bad song...?
Not at all. It's a good song. I always knew loving cup is probably without Taylor, that's why I said: 'thanks for the effort'.
Most Jones era footage is in black and white, and the Wood era sounds like grayscale to me
And Brown Sugar, where Taylor is inaudible? A little more colorful?
I've always said that BS as a studio version is boring BS, but great when performed live during the 71-73 years. So the song in itself must be great.
Let me guess, the same goes for Gimmie Shelter, right?
No. But it is possible the same goes for Gimme Shelter.
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
VT22Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
VT22Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
VT22
magee mineko
The right channel of Loving Cup is Taylor.
The guitar phrase of 2:24~2:32 resembles Taylor of "I'm Free" ['69 live] .
The vibrato of 2:53~2:57 is Taylor's characteristic. It is not Keith.
[Because I am a Japanese, I am poor at English.
I cannot explain well. I'm sorry.
Thanks for the effort.
Listening to the stones without Mick Taylor is like watching tv in black & white to me.
So, if you find out that Loving Cup is indeed without Taylor, it all of a sudden turns into a bad song...?
Not at all. It's a good song. I always knew loving cup is probably without Taylor, that's why I said: 'thanks for the effort'.
Most Jones era footage is in black and white, and the Wood era sounds like grayscale to me
And Brown Sugar, where Taylor is inaudible? A little more colorful?
I do prefer the versions were Taylor is audible. He makes all songs more colorful.
I take it Keith is your favorite player, the superior guitarist within the Stones framework, reading your posts all over the years? At least you're the most competent musical poster on iorr.org.
Yep, he is my favorite player, indeed, but so it Taylor and Wood.
Keith is my number one, mainly because of his sound and his song writing. However, when I play solos myself, they tend to be a mix of Taylor and Wood, with hopefully a little of myself in there
Quote
kleermakerQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
VT22Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
VT22Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
VT22
magee mineko
The right channel of Loving Cup is Taylor.
The guitar phrase of 2:24~2:32 resembles Taylor of "I'm Free" ['69 live] .
The vibrato of 2:53~2:57 is Taylor's characteristic. It is not Keith.
[Because I am a Japanese, I am poor at English.
I cannot explain well. I'm sorry.
Thanks for the effort.
Listening to the stones without Mick Taylor is like watching tv in black & white to me.
So, if you find out that Loving Cup is indeed without Taylor, it all of a sudden turns into a bad song...?
Not at all. It's a good song. I always knew loving cup is probably without Taylor, that's why I said: 'thanks for the effort'.
Most Jones era footage is in black and white, and the Wood era sounds like grayscale to me
And Brown Sugar, where Taylor is inaudible? A little more colorful?
I do prefer the versions were Taylor is audible. He makes all songs more colorful.
I take it Keith is your favorite player, the superior guitarist within the Stones framework, reading your posts all over the years? At least you're the most competent musical poster on iorr.org.
Yep, he is my favorite player, indeed, but so it Taylor and Wood.
Keith is my number one, mainly because of his sound and his song writing. However, when I play solos myself, they tend to be a mix of Taylor and Wood, with hopefully a little of myself in there
Or say it as follows: my own solos are an unique mix of Taylor and Wood
For me Keith is the most important songwriter of the Stones, followed by Jagger and then Taylor (or maybe better said: Jagger/Taylor). My favourite guitarist is Taylor. My favourite instrumentalist is Jones. I love Keith's riffs, but the rest is for an important part between good and average. I can't discover anything interesting in Wood's playing at all. The Taylor-Richards combination as guitarists is, especially live, hors catégorie.
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
kleermakerQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
VT22Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
VT22Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
VT22
magee mineko
The right channel of Loving Cup is Taylor.
The guitar phrase of 2:24~2:32 resembles Taylor of "I'm Free" ['69 live] .
The vibrato of 2:53~2:57 is Taylor's characteristic. It is not Keith.
[Because I am a Japanese, I am poor at English.
I cannot explain well. I'm sorry.
Thanks for the effort.
Listening to the stones without Mick Taylor is like watching tv in black & white to me.
So, if you find out that Loving Cup is indeed without Taylor, it all of a sudden turns into a bad song...?
Not at all. It's a good song. I always knew loving cup is probably without Taylor, that's why I said: 'thanks for the effort'.
Most Jones era footage is in black and white, and the Wood era sounds like grayscale to me
And Brown Sugar, where Taylor is inaudible? A little more colorful?
I do prefer the versions were Taylor is audible. He makes all songs more colorful.
I take it Keith is your favorite player, the superior guitarist within the Stones framework, reading your posts all over the years? At least you're the most competent musical poster on iorr.org.
Yep, he is my favorite player, indeed, but so it Taylor and Wood.
Keith is my number one, mainly because of his sound and his song writing. However, when I play solos myself, they tend to be a mix of Taylor and Wood, with hopefully a little of myself in there
Or say it as follows: my own solos are an unique mix of Taylor and Wood
For me Keith is the most important songwriter of the Stones, followed by Jagger and then Taylor (or maybe better said: Jagger/Taylor). My favourite guitarist is Taylor. My favourite instrumentalist is Jones. I love Keith's riffs, but the rest is for an important part between good and average. I can't discover anything interesting in Wood's playing at all. The Taylor-Richards combination as guitarists is, especially live, hors catégorie.
My favorite Stones album is almost without Keith-riffs, and my favorite Stones song doesn´t feature Keith at all. So the world doesn´t have to be that black and white, kleermaker
BTW, what´s your favorite Taylor/Wood-song? Mine is Crotch Music.
Quote
His MajestyQuote
magee mineko
The right channel of Loving Cup is Taylor.
The guitar phrase of 2:24~2:32 resembles Taylor of "I'm Free" ['69 live] .
The vibrato of 2:53~2:57 is Taylor's characteristic. It is not Keith.
[Because I am a Japanese, I am poor at English.
I cannot explain well. I'm sorry. ]
[www.facebook.com]
You explained it perfectly.
Quote
MathijsQuote
His Majesty
Taylors guitar tone is crystal clean on Loving Cup, bluesy and driven for the lead fills on Honky Tonk... totally different sounds.
Keith is doing the bends you are focusing on, he's not dropping out for that.
But really, nevermind.
No smart ass, I am not focussing on the heavy driven open G guitar as I mentioned several times. It's the tremelo picked clean guitar doing country bends equal to HTW, and these are Taylor.
Check out at 1:30: first the tremelo picked clean chords, then the country bend that constitutes the intro of HTW. Again: the clean guitar, not the fat over-driven Richards part. And the clean guitar sound is from the same amp and guitar as the overdriven sound from Taylor on HTW.
Mathijs
Quote
straycatblues73Quote
His MajestyQuote
magee mineko
The right channel of Loving Cup is Taylor.
The guitar phrase of 2:24~2:32 resembles Taylor of "I'm Free" ['69 live] .
The vibrato of 2:53~2:57 is Taylor's characteristic. It is not Keith.
[Because I am a Japanese, I am poor at English.
I cannot explain well. I'm sorry. ]
[www.facebook.com]
You explained it perfectly.
indeed ,perfectly , but also wrongly though .
left channel accoustic
right channel electric is certainly keith in spite of a few seconds resembling a taylor like phrasing ( playing together would rub off ) would still leave 99% of the track -keith.
The vibrato of 2:53~2:57 is Taylor's characteristic this is keiths' (faster) vibrato heard on shake your hips.Quote
MathijsQuote
His Majesty
Taylors guitar tone is crystal clean on Loving Cup, bluesy and driven for the lead fills on Honky Tonk... totally different sounds.
Keith is doing the bends you are focusing on, he's not dropping out for that.
But really, nevermind.
No smart ass, I am not focussing on the heavy driven open G guitar as I mentioned several times. It's the tremelo picked clean guitar doing country bends equal to HTW, and these are Taylor.
Check out at 1:30: first the tremelo picked clean chords, then the country bend that constitutes the intro of HTW. Again: the clean guitar, not the fat over-driven Richards part. And the clean guitar sound is from the same amp and guitar as the overdriven sound from Taylor on HTW.
Mathijs
Well ,luckily this is in stereo and therefor much easier to distinguish , actually without a doubt : keiths is the first guitar right channel , taylor the other similar to dead flowers.
this to me represents the "new" richards solo style started with gimmie shelter and included leather jacket , dead flowers ( no , not the solo), wild horses , coming down again ,short and curlies , fingerprint file ,maybe reaching its peak on fool to cry ?
Quote
MathijsQuote
His Majesty
Taylors guitar tone is crystal clean on Loving Cup, bluesy and driven for the lead fills on Honky Tonk... totally different sounds.
Keith is doing the bends you are focusing on, he's not dropping out for that.
But really, nevermind.
No smart ass, I am not focussing on the heavy driven open G guitar as I mentioned several times. It's the tremelo picked clean guitar doing country bends equal to HTW, and these are Taylor.
Check out at 1:30: first the tremelo picked clean chords, then the country bend that constitutes the intro of HTW. Again: the clean guitar, not the fat over-driven Richards part. And the clean guitar sound is from the same amp and guitar as the overdriven sound from Taylor on HTW.
Mathijs
Quote
DandelionPowderman
I listened to Turd On The Run again, and in fact Mathijs is right about the second guitar. It's Keith.
It is kinda mixed down, and you can't hear every note clearly, though.
Quote
LieB
Going back to Loving Cup, I found this supposedly early instrumental outtake of the song. Quite a different tune from what it would soon become:
video: [youtu.be]
Quote
liddasQuote
DandelionPowderman
I listened to Turd On The Run again, and in fact Mathijs is right about the second guitar. It's Keith.
It is kinda mixed down, and you can't hear every note clearly, though.
You mean the same "second guitar" I was referring to? Never heard Keith playing this way before or after. Not that this means much with Keith. But why are you so sure it is Keith?
C