For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
NoCode0680
Mick and Keith need each other, and each of them left to their own devices wouldn't do anything nearly as great as they do together.
I remember reading an interview with Keith back around the time Bridges To Babylon came out in which he said that Mick is very trendy, he's very into whatever music is happening right now, etc. And it was his job to try and reel Mick in from getting too far out there, bringing it back to being Stones appropriate, even if heavily influenced by other genres.
On the flip side I think you can say that without Mick's varied tastes, his finger always on the pulse of popular culture, etc, the Stones would just be a band that spent 50 years playing blues songs.
Quote
TurnerQuote
71TeleAwful badQuote
WeLoveToPlayTheBluesQuote
SomeGirlsXXX
I love Mick in the Stones. Isn't it weird how he can be so good, but then make such lame stuff. Mick can and does do what he wants. STUPID, that's all, just my opinion. Just because something is "new", or "hip" according to Access Hollywood, doesn't make it new or hip... "Oh No Not You Again" and "Rough Justice" give me a lot of hope as they are two of the best Songs they've cranked out in decades.
Oh boy. You're the cake in 3D.
Here is a not good classic lame STUPID one that's on that album with the two best songs they cranked out in decades (? What the hell are you SMOKING? DECADES? Maybe - possibly - since...1997) somehow instead of his last solo album:
This is very, very bad.
Quote
Turner
Still one wonders why or how Jagger can put out good music and at the same time chase fashion and release embarrassing junk
He's certainly no Jools HollandQuote
treaclefingersQuote
Turner
Still one wonders why or how Jagger can put out good music and at the same time chase fashion and release embarrassing junk
No one is perfect.