For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
FreeBird
I'd do the same. I'm not interested in classical music, and I'd probably have a train to catch.
Quote
marvpeck
How about people were just trying to get to work,
not be late and make money to feed their families.
Quote
MILKYWAY
That was awhile ago.
Quote
I'm StonedQuote
FreeBird
I'd do the same. I'm not interested in classical music, and I'd probably have a train to catch.
Not interested in classical music? A very strong opinion...
I think a lot of classical pieces are just like blues: stripped-down and pure music with a lot of emotion!
Not listening to classical music at all is missing out on a lot of beautiful music, in my opinion.
Quote
ineedadrink
or maybe classical music fans don't ride the subway, they drive fancy cars
Quote
I'm StonedQuote
FreeBird
I'd do the same. I'm not interested in classical music, and I'd probably have a train to catch.
Not interested in classical music? A very strong opinion...
I think a lot of classical pieces are just like blues: stripped-down and pure music with a lot of emotion!
Not listening to classical music at all is missing out on a lot of beautiful music, in my opinion.
Cheers!
Quote
tatters
I'll bet if it had been Keith Richards playing in the subway, people would have forgotten all about having to get to work on time.
Quote
Green Lady
Almost nobody ever stops to listen to a busker in the Tube, whatever the quality of the music. (And there are some that frankly you can't get out of earshot quickly enough!) Good ones give you a few minutes of pleasure as you walk by, and deserve their "tip" for cheering up your morning a bit. Joshua Bell made $32 in 45 minutes and several people actually did pause to listen for as long as they had time - in busking-in-the-subway terms, that's fairly good going, and certainly not being "ignored". But a tunnel is not the place to collect a crowd, whoever you may be.
Quote
tattersQuote
Green Lady
Almost nobody ever stops to listen to a busker in the Tube, whatever the quality of the music. (And there are some that frankly you can't get out of earshot quickly enough!) Good ones give you a few minutes of pleasure as you walk by, and deserve their "tip" for cheering up your morning a bit. Joshua Bell made $32 in 45 minutes and several people actually did pause to listen for as long as they had time - in busking-in-the-subway terms, that's fairly good going, and certainly not being "ignored". But a tunnel is not the place to collect a crowd, whoever you may be.
But that's exactly the point of the experiment. We are conditioned to experience beauty and talent only in places that are designated for that purpose. If we encounter something spectacularly great in a setting where we would not expect it to be, we are unable to process it, to recognize it. We are pre-conditioned to think, "Look at that loser playing in the subway. He MUST not be very good, otherwise he wouldn't be playing HERE, he'd be playing with the Philharmonic". Likewise, anyone we see performing at Carnegie Hall sort of gets the benefit of the doubt, doesn't he? We think, "He MUST be great, because he's playing HERE". My favorite part of the story is the little kids who wanted to stay and listen. THEY knew they were in the presence of something very special, but only because they were too young to have been pre-conditioned. No one told them that you have to go to a concert hall if you want to see someone very good, and that no one very good ever plays in the subway.
Quote
DaveG
Frankly, I think it was a useless "experiment". Seriously, how many times have we seen and heard a musician playing in a subway, on a downtown street corner, or some other crowded place, and just passed by. Why? WE'RE ON OUR WAY SOMEWHERE! Just because this world-class violinist was ignored it doesn't mean people are missing beauty or talent or brilliance. Maybe when they get home from earning a living they sit and listen to classical music for an hour to relax or maybe they went to the Boston venue and paid $100.00 to experience the symphony. It says more about the stupidity of the Washington Post for wasting their time and money trying to discover people's "priorities". Evidently, the main priority was to get to work on time.
Quote
tattersQuote
DaveG
Frankly, I think it was a useless "experiment". Seriously, how many times have we seen and heard a musician playing in a subway, on a downtown street corner, or some other crowded place, and just passed by. Why? WE'RE ON OUR WAY SOMEWHERE! Just because this world-class violinist was ignored it doesn't mean people are missing beauty or talent or brilliance. Maybe when they get home from earning a living they sit and listen to classical music for an hour to relax or maybe they went to the Boston venue and paid $100.00 to experience the symphony. It says more about the stupidity of the Washington Post for wasting their time and money trying to discover people's "priorities". Evidently, the main priority was to get to work on time.
It sounds like you and everyone else here needs to learn how to stop and smell the roses.
Quote
DaveG
No, I really do take time to enjoy life and all its pleasures. I simply think that, if people are on a deadline to catch a train, bus, plane because being late to work will create problems, then their first priority is to get to work, not stop and listen to a street musician, no matter how talented he may be. I wonder if the results would have been different if the violinist had been playing in one of the subway cars. Then people would have been able to at least have the choice of listening or tuning him out.
If one of my employees were late to a meeting and he told me it was because he took some time to listen to an awesome street musician, he'd be reprimanded and given a warning.
Quote
DaveG
If one of my employees were late to a meeting and he told me it was because he took some time to listen to an awesome street musician, he'd be reprimanded and given a warning.
What makes you so sure of that? Maybe he'd been driving his mother crazy by stopping for any random street musician, no matter how bad. You're guilty of the same kind of assumptions you accuse others of.Quote
tatters
My favorite part of the story is the three-year-old boy who wanted to stay and listen. Somehow, HE KNEW he was in the presence of greatness. He was too young to have been pre-conditioned. No one told him that great musicians only play in concert halls, and that no one very good ever plays in the subway.
Quote
StonesTodQuote
tattersQuote
Green Lady
Almost nobody ever stops to listen to a busker in the Tube, whatever the quality of the music. (And there are some that frankly you can't get out of earshot quickly enough!) Good ones give you a few minutes of pleasure as you walk by, and deserve their "tip" for cheering up your morning a bit. Joshua Bell made $32 in 45 minutes and several people actually did pause to listen for as long as they had time - in busking-in-the-subway terms, that's fairly good going, and certainly not being "ignored". But a tunnel is not the place to collect a crowd, whoever you may be.
But that's exactly the point of the experiment. We are conditioned to experience beauty and talent only in places that are designated for that purpose. If we encounter something spectacularly great in a setting where we would not expect it to be, we are unable to process it, to recognize it. We are pre-conditioned to think, "Look at that loser playing in the subway. He MUST not be very good, otherwise he wouldn't be playing HERE, he'd be playing with the Philharmonic". Likewise, anyone we see performing at Carnegie Hall sort of gets the benefit of the doubt, doesn't he? We think, "He MUST be great, because he's playing HERE". My favorite part of the story is the little kids who wanted to stay and listen. THEY knew they were in the presence of something very special, but only because they were too young to have been pre-conditioned. No one told them that you have to go to a concert hall if you want to see someone very good, and that no one very good ever plays in the subway.
good post, tatters