Tell Me :
Talk
would evening shows upset you?
would a lack of T & A upset you?
it's just two letters and an ampersand...nothing to get my panties in a twist about....
What will happen - tour? (that we know, just a matter of when and where they will announce it.)
Arena?
Stadium?
Club?
Big cities?
Small cities?
Tell us and more or less when - this spring or summer??
They've been playing stadiums for the past 25 years...at this point, the universe of those who are still waiting to see them "once in their life" is pretty small. Arenas will do.
there's an old guy down the hall who has missed the last 32 tours because of an assortment of reasons. they need to give him one more chance....
Yeah I see a few (5 or 6) stadium shows in Europe in their future this summer. They need a challenge and proving they can still fill stadiums at 70 and also try to beat their O2 bonanza ($17 million, probably the world record) will do just that.
A few arena shows in the US in the winter, SF/LA/Florida probably wouldn't hurt either, and shows in Japan in the Spring either.
or just RICH for RICHards...that'll be the reasoning for the ticket prices.
1) true.
2) there are only three possible bidders. Cohl/Live Nation (they've settled
their legal issues), AEG, and Dainty/Branson.
3) various news stories have indicated what the Stones were being offered in
2012 by one or more of the above parties was about $100 million for 50 arena
shows. Stadiums were not under consideration. $2 million a show. But Mick said
no. Was it the money or was it Keith's un-readiness or some other reason?
4) So Mick Dainty and Branson came up with the NY/London scheme for $5.5 million
a show later in the year (Actually the intention was $7 million a show for
4 shows, but when the VIP tix didn't move as well as hoped, the fifth show was
added, as per prior contingency agreement, in order for there to be an adequate
gross to cover the guarantee. The Stones got nothing extra for the fifth show.)
5) this is of course all approximation. but perhaps it does provide some
guidance when speculating just how much Mick wants to do in 2013, in what kind
of venue, and how much he needs in return.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2013-01-20 05:59 by superrevvy.
So, then after all Keith's puffing in his book, he isn't giving up his old ways in not participating the decision making part of the work? He was only kidding,..?
Peanut
PeanutGallery
Talk about your favorite band.
For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Stones Tour 2013
Posted by:
daytime
()
Date: January 18, 2013 20:03
I wonder if the forth coming tour will be a fair sized one. Do you think they should play some small cities or big? I'd like to see both.
Re: Stones Tour 2013
Posted by:
Max'sKansasCity
()
Date: January 18, 2013 20:06
I am betting 2-3 night arena shows in big cities like LA, Hong Kong, Rio, Chicago, Paris, etc.. then back to NYLON
Re: Stones Tour 2013
Posted by:
Edith Grove
()
Date: January 18, 2013 21:48
I think Keith wants to visit Fordyce, Arkansas again.
Re: Stones Tour 2013
Posted by:
mtaylor
()
Date: January 19, 2013 14:10
No Coachella.
Contrary to strong hints and rumors, the Rolling Stones will not perform at the 2013 Coachella Valley Music and Arts Festival, a source close to the band tells Rolling Stone.
The evidence was overwhelming: the Indio, California festival appeared on the band's own official app in December under their tour dates section, and festival organizers later used their official Facebook page to post a photo of a stone rolling on the Empire Polo Grounds, where Coachella is held.
Rare and Intimate Pictures of the Rolling Stones
But expect to still see the band on the road in 2013. "There have been quite a few offers," Mick Jagger told us recently after wrapping the bands recent 50th anniversary shows in London, New York and New Jersey. "I'm going to see what's on the table and discuss it with everyone. We'll announce it when we've figured it out." Added Keith Richards, "Really, all you're going to have to do is wait for an announcement . . . We barely got off the starting blocks. It would be dopey to bring things up to this level and say, 'Well, that's that, 50 years, bye-bye.'"
Read more: [www.rollingstone.com]
Follow us: @rollingstone on Twitter | RollingStone on Facebook
More on NME
[www.nme.com]
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2013-01-19 14:12 by mtaylor.
Contrary to strong hints and rumors, the Rolling Stones will not perform at the 2013 Coachella Valley Music and Arts Festival, a source close to the band tells Rolling Stone.
The evidence was overwhelming: the Indio, California festival appeared on the band's own official app in December under their tour dates section, and festival organizers later used their official Facebook page to post a photo of a stone rolling on the Empire Polo Grounds, where Coachella is held.
Rare and Intimate Pictures of the Rolling Stones
But expect to still see the band on the road in 2013. "There have been quite a few offers," Mick Jagger told us recently after wrapping the bands recent 50th anniversary shows in London, New York and New Jersey. "I'm going to see what's on the table and discuss it with everyone. We'll announce it when we've figured it out." Added Keith Richards, "Really, all you're going to have to do is wait for an announcement . . . We barely got off the starting blocks. It would be dopey to bring things up to this level and say, 'Well, that's that, 50 years, bye-bye.'"
Read more: [www.rollingstone.com]
Follow us: @rollingstone on Twitter | RollingStone on Facebook
More on NME
[www.nme.com]
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2013-01-19 14:12 by mtaylor.
Re: Stones Tour 2013
Posted by:
T&A
()
Date: January 19, 2013 17:31
Quote
daytime
I wonder if the forth coming tour will be a fair sized one. Do you think they should play some small cities or big? I'd like to see both.
would evening shows upset you?
Re: Stones Tour 2013
Posted by:
treaclefingers
()
Date: January 19, 2013 17:51
Quote
T&AQuote
daytime
I wonder if the forth coming tour will be a fair sized one. Do you think they should play some small cities or big? I'd like to see both.
would evening shows upset you?
would a lack of T & A upset you?
Re: Stones Tour 2013
Posted by:
T&A
()
Date: January 19, 2013 17:53
Quote
treaclefingersQuote
T&AQuote
daytime
I wonder if the forth coming tour will be a fair sized one. Do you think they should play some small cities or big? I'd like to see both.
would evening shows upset you?
would a lack of T & A upset you?
it's just two letters and an ampersand...nothing to get my panties in a twist about....
Re: Stones Tour 2013
Posted by:
Chris Fountain
()
Date: January 19, 2013 18:22
This U.S. navigation is my prediction as North America will kick off the tour ( not counting the NY & NJ shows. This is just the "first leg." No clue of date possibilities- just a guess as I think SF and Ravens will cover the spread!
Boston
Philly
DC
Charlotte or Greensboro
Atlanta
Tampa
Sunrise (Ft Laud)
New Orleans
Dallas
St Louis
Chicago
Phoenix
L.A.
Seattle (maybe)
Off to Europe
S.America
Australia
Two or three Asian shows
A few more US shows
If stamina holds true-
c
Boston
Philly
DC
Charlotte or Greensboro
Atlanta
Tampa
Sunrise (Ft Laud)
New Orleans
Dallas
St Louis
Chicago
Phoenix
L.A.
Seattle (maybe)
Off to Europe
S.America
Australia
Two or three Asian shows
A few more US shows
If stamina holds true-
c
Re: Stones Tour 2013
Posted by:
mtaylor
()
Date: January 19, 2013 18:30
Quote
bv
It will happen.
What will happen - tour? (that we know, just a matter of when and where they will announce it.)
Arena?
Stadium?
Club?
Big cities?
Small cities?
Tell us and more or less when - this spring or summer??
Re: Stones Tour 2013
Posted by:
treaclefingers
()
Date: January 19, 2013 19:00
Quote
T&AQuote
treaclefingersQuote
T&AQuote
daytime
I wonder if the forth coming tour will be a fair sized one. Do you think they should play some small cities or big? I'd like to see both.
would evening shows upset you?
would a lack of T & A upset you?
it's just two letters and an ampersand...nothing to get my panties in a twist about....
Re: Stones Tour 2013
Posted by:
georgeV
()
Date: January 19, 2013 19:23
My hunch is they will do the following:
slowly announce 5-6 shows at a time:
LA, San Fran, Vegas
Do those shows at $500-800 a ticket and then announce an east coast tour:
NY, Boston, Philadelphia
Do those shows at $500-800 a ticket and then announce a midwest tour:
Toronto, Chicago, Denver
Do those shows at $5-800 a ticket and then announce a European tour:
London, Paris, Frankfurt
You get the drift, each will be billed as the possible last time in order to drain our wallets at high price tickets!
slowly announce 5-6 shows at a time:
LA, San Fran, Vegas
Do those shows at $500-800 a ticket and then announce an east coast tour:
NY, Boston, Philadelphia
Do those shows at $500-800 a ticket and then announce a midwest tour:
Toronto, Chicago, Denver
Do those shows at $5-800 a ticket and then announce a European tour:
London, Paris, Frankfurt
You get the drift, each will be billed as the possible last time in order to drain our wallets at high price tickets!
Re: Stones Tour 2013
Posted by:
phd
()
Date: January 19, 2013 19:47
Big Stadiums that will allow the most to attend once in their life a concert by the Greatest Rock Band ever. Arenas are for the few.
Re: Stones Tour 2013
Posted by:
Jah Paul
()
Date: January 19, 2013 20:14
Quote
phd
Big Stadiums that will allow the most to attend once in their life a concert by the Greatest Rock Band ever. Arenas are for the few.
They've been playing stadiums for the past 25 years...at this point, the universe of those who are still waiting to see them "once in their life" is pretty small. Arenas will do.
Re: Stones Tour 2013
Posted by:
GasLightStreet
()
Date: January 19, 2013 20:48
If they tour...
NYC (MSG)
Boston
Philly
DC
Atlanta
Miami
Tampa
Dallas
Phoenix
Las Vegas
Los Angeles
San Francisco
Seattle
Denver
St Louis
Nashville
Chicago
Detroit
Cleveland - big maybe
Pittsburgh - big maybe
NJ
NYC (MSG)
Boston
Philly
DC
Atlanta
Miami
Tampa
Dallas
Phoenix
Las Vegas
Los Angeles
San Francisco
Seattle
Denver
St Louis
Nashville
Chicago
Detroit
Cleveland - big maybe
Pittsburgh - big maybe
NJ
Re: Stones Tour 2013
Posted by:
superrevvy
()
Date: January 19, 2013 21:05
if it happens, I'm thinking along the same lines as GeorgeV and JahPaul
small arenas, relatively few shows, a lot more Taylor, and big big prices
its the only card they have left to play i think.
it needs a concept though. a bit more musically serious i think. a few more
deep cuts. more like a recital.
plus release an album with again a couple new songs, and some wonderful unreleased
tracks including some killer live versions of some of the warhorses
we just had Grrr for JagGrrr. this one could be HARD, for RicHARDs
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2013-01-19 21:06 by superrevvy.
small arenas, relatively few shows, a lot more Taylor, and big big prices
its the only card they have left to play i think.
it needs a concept though. a bit more musically serious i think. a few more
deep cuts. more like a recital.
plus release an album with again a couple new songs, and some wonderful unreleased
tracks including some killer live versions of some of the warhorses
we just had Grrr for JagGrrr. this one could be HARD, for RicHARDs
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2013-01-19 21:06 by superrevvy.
Re: Stones Tour 2013
Posted by:
T&A
()
Date: January 19, 2013 21:36
Quote
Jah Paul
at this point, the universe of those who are still waiting to see them "once in their life" is pretty small.
there's an old guy down the hall who has missed the last 32 tours because of an assortment of reasons. they need to give him one more chance....
Re: Stones Tour 2013
Posted by:
bv
()
Date: January 19, 2013 22:34
They are up for bids. Very simple. Show us the money. Where, when, crowd, concept and so on. I see the requests. This looks interesting. We just need some patience. Luckily it seems I have the spring for cross country skiing and private stuff, but the rest of the year is all booked for the Stones.
Bjornulf
Bjornulf
Re: Stones Tour 2013
Posted by:
Stones2005
()
Date: January 19, 2013 22:41
I just wish they would hurry up and annouce a tour, so I can plan my holidays around a concert somewhere in the US, before the company I work for forces me to put in dates for my holidays...
Re: Stones Tour 2013
Posted by:
gotdablouse
()
Date: January 19, 2013 22:50
Quote
phd
Big Stadiums that will allow the most to attend once in their life a concert by the Greatest Rock Band ever. Arenas are for the few.
Yeah I see a few (5 or 6) stadium shows in Europe in their future this summer. They need a challenge and proving they can still fill stadiums at 70 and also try to beat their O2 bonanza ($17 million, probably the world record) will do just that.
A few arena shows in the US in the winter, SF/LA/Florida probably wouldn't hurt either, and shows in Japan in the Spring either.
Re: Stones Tour 2013
Posted by:
talkcheap
()
Date: January 19, 2013 22:56
If the Stones tour I would like to see them again. But not more than one or two shows. The Stones are good, my favorite band, but we are not talking progressive jazz here. And they or not like Bob Dylan that remake all his songs for every night. The Stones have never been a band good on jaming like Grateful Dead. But to see them once or twice is OK for me.
Re: Stones Tour 2013
Posted by:
runrudolph
()
Date: January 19, 2013 23:26
So BV, what you are aaying, suggesting after spring they will tour? i believe you, but there will be an announcement in March or so then?? or sooner? i hope they wont play the amsterdam Arena.
jeroen
jeroen
Re: Stones Tour 2013
Posted by:
angee
()
Date: January 20, 2013 00:16
If they have limited dates, I still quite like the idea of mini-residencies, a few shows in one geographical
area.
Btw, George, if they play Ohio, a big if, as you say, but hope so, most likely they will go to Columbus, rather than Cleveland, as they've done more recently.
~"Love is Strong"~
area.
Btw, George, if they play Ohio, a big if, as you say, but hope so, most likely they will go to Columbus, rather than Cleveland, as they've done more recently.
~"Love is Strong"~
Re: Stones Tour 2013
Posted by:
treaclefingers
()
Date: January 20, 2013 00:17
Quote
superrevvy
if it happens, I'm thinking along the same lines as GeorgeV and JahPaul
small arenas, relatively few shows, a lot more Taylor, and big big prices
its the only card they have left to play i think.
it needs a concept though. a bit more musically serious i think. a few more
deep cuts. more like a recital.
plus release an album with again a couple new songs, and some wonderful unreleased
tracks including some killer live versions of some of the warhorses
we just had Grrr for JagGrrr. this one could be HARD, for RicHARDs
or just RICH for RICHards...that'll be the reasoning for the ticket prices.
Re: Stones Tour 2013
Posted by:
superrevvy
()
Date: January 20, 2013 00:52
Quote
bv
They are up for bids. Very simple. Show us the money.
1) true.
2) there are only three possible bidders. Cohl/Live Nation (they've settled
their legal issues), AEG, and Dainty/Branson.
3) various news stories have indicated what the Stones were being offered in
2012 by one or more of the above parties was about $100 million for 50 arena
shows. Stadiums were not under consideration. $2 million a show. But Mick said
no. Was it the money or was it Keith's un-readiness or some other reason?
4) So Mick Dainty and Branson came up with the NY/London scheme for $5.5 million
a show later in the year (Actually the intention was $7 million a show for
4 shows, but when the VIP tix didn't move as well as hoped, the fifth show was
added, as per prior contingency agreement, in order for there to be an adequate
gross to cover the guarantee. The Stones got nothing extra for the fifth show.)
5) this is of course all approximation. but perhaps it does provide some
guidance when speculating just how much Mick wants to do in 2013, in what kind
of venue, and how much he needs in return.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2013-01-20 05:59 by superrevvy.
Re: Stones Tour 2013
Posted by:
superrevvy
()
Date: January 20, 2013 04:58
ELEPHANT TRUMPS GORILLA
here's the real elephant in the room, stones fans
KR: "Once the juggernaut starts rolling, it ain't gonna stop. An extra gig
here, a place we never played there, things go on."
Well, sorry, it did not go on, it did stop.
Of all the "many" offers supposedly under consideration, either extending
50 and Counting into the new year was not one of them, or was turned down for
some reason.
That's BIG. The staging is there, the band is rehearsed, all those costs have
been absorbed, so ticket prices could have come down a notch or two, and yet...
NOTHING. All they would have needed to do is send Taylor to the tailor for some
stage clothes, and they could have been playing around the world at this very
moment.
So it is not unreasonable to assume there was a perception on the part of
the promoters of insufficient demand (to meet the Stones cash-on-the-barrelhead
requirements). Why else would the Stones not be playing right now?
Right now is when Mick, and many of y'all, have claimed that everybody in
the band is "at the top of their game", with the Stones and their fans
raring to go. The juggernaut completely fueled up. Yet once again bogged
down in the sands of time.
Tell me, what is going to be so different in eight months, except needing a new
stage, new rehearsals, and new hype to soak the same old fans, flying in from
around the world, with the same old show? Tarted up just enough to get by.
Edited 4 time(s). Last edit at 2013-01-20 06:00 by superrevvy.
here's the real elephant in the room, stones fans
KR: "Once the juggernaut starts rolling, it ain't gonna stop. An extra gig
here, a place we never played there, things go on."
Well, sorry, it did not go on, it did stop.
Of all the "many" offers supposedly under consideration, either extending
50 and Counting into the new year was not one of them, or was turned down for
some reason.
That's BIG. The staging is there, the band is rehearsed, all those costs have
been absorbed, so ticket prices could have come down a notch or two, and yet...
NOTHING. All they would have needed to do is send Taylor to the tailor for some
stage clothes, and they could have been playing around the world at this very
moment.
So it is not unreasonable to assume there was a perception on the part of
the promoters of insufficient demand (to meet the Stones cash-on-the-barrelhead
requirements). Why else would the Stones not be playing right now?
Right now is when Mick, and many of y'all, have claimed that everybody in
the band is "at the top of their game", with the Stones and their fans
raring to go. The juggernaut completely fueled up. Yet once again bogged
down in the sands of time.
Tell me, what is going to be so different in eight months, except needing a new
stage, new rehearsals, and new hype to soak the same old fans, flying in from
around the world, with the same old show? Tarted up just enough to get by.
Edited 4 time(s). Last edit at 2013-01-20 06:00 by superrevvy.
Re: Stones Tour 2013
Posted by:
daytime
()
Date: January 20, 2013 05:48
I got some money saved up for a few years now, I knew a rainy day would come. If I see them 2 times I'm happy.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2013-01-20 05:51 by daytime.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2013-01-20 05:51 by daytime.
Re: Stones Tour 2013
Posted by:
21stcenturystones
()
Date: January 20, 2013 06:07
There will be no tour
Re: Stones Tour 2013
Posted by:
Stones2005
()
Date: January 20, 2013 06:09
Bet you you are wrong!Quote
21stcenturystones
There will be no tour
Re: Stones Tour 2013
Posted by:
PeanutGallery
()
Date: January 20, 2013 07:38
Quote
superrevvyQuote
bv
They are up for bids. Very simple. Show us the money.
1) true.
2) there are only three possible bidders. Cohl/Live Nation (they've settled
their legal issues), AEG, and Dainty/Branson.
How about Dainty/Branson, AEG, and Live/Nation in that order instead? Dainty/Branson are likely to have gotten some leg up going into future shows because of their 50th Anniversary deal. AEG next because of #3 below and then, LiveNation last not that order makes any difference in the final analysis.
3) various news stories have indicated what the Stones were being offered in
2012 by one or more of the above parties was about $100 million for 50 arena
shows. Stadiums were not under consideration. $2 million a show. But Mick said
no. Was it the money or was it Keith's un-readiness or some other reason?
Mick alone said no,... think Keith is still abstaining from participating in decision making after his, Life?
4) So Mick Dainty and Branson came up with the NY/London scheme for $5.5 million
a show later in the year (Actually the intention was $7 million a show for
4 shows, but when the VIP tix didn't move as well as hoped, the fifth show was
added, as per prior contingency agreement, in order for there to be an adequate
gross to cover the guarantee. The Stones got nothing extra for the fifth show.)
Not doubting you, but where can I read more about the VIP tix not moving as well as hoped? Exactly what in meant by the VIP tix? — a la carte? or in tour packages?
5) this is of course all approximation. but perhaps it does provide some
guidance when speculating just how much Mick wants to do in 2013, in what kind
of venue, and how much he needs in return.
So, then after all Keith's puffing in his book, he isn't giving up his old ways in not participating the decision making part of the work? He was only kidding,..?
Peanut
PeanutGallery
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Online Users
downagain , gastonl74 , HotStuff92 , Kevinstones78 , lincolnblues , livefromuk , makemeburnthecandle , roryg , steffialicia , Tonstone , TumblinDice76
Guests:
1742
Record Number of Users:
206
on June 1, 2022 23:50
Record Number of Guests:
9627
on January 2, 2024 23:10