For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
Honestman
I would say that those RCA years were absulutely peak for Brian Jones in stylewise. he semed to have an eye to little details - like the shoes and the shirt here - that were quite unique choices. A cool looking dude - no wonder the girls went crazy for him.
(But I think he totally lost the sense to dress in 1967 when he started to look like an old tired hippie to dress any ridiculous stuff he could find and didn't suit for him.)
- Doxa
Quote
Honestman
Unfortunately, I don't have the photographers credits since I've crashed my PC
some days ago, my whole database was saved with # under each pictures
But I'm sure that some people here could help
Quote
straycat58
This book will be available November next and should include the Bob Bonis pix, maybe at the RCA studios as well.
[www.amazon.com]
Quote
His MajestyQuote
Honestman
Unfortunately, I don't have the photographers credits since I've crashed my PC
some days ago, my whole database was saved with # under each pictures
But I'm sure that some people here could help
I think that above pic is from a 1965 tv appearance, possibly Ready, Steady, go.
Quote
Doxa
I would say that those RCA years were absulutely peak for Brian Jones in stylewise. he semed to have an eye to little details - like the shoes and the shirt here - that were quite unique choices. A cool looking dude - no wonder the girls went crazy for him.
(But I think he totally lost the sense to dress in 1967 when he started to look like an old tired hippie to dress any ridiculous stuff he could find and didn't suit for him.)
- Doxa
Quote
SwayStones
I agree .But in 67 he also went very much into drugs and on "hippie stuff" ,plus he gained so much weight ..What a shame indeed .
Quote
palerider22
And Finally.....
Quote
with sssoul
>> Keep em coming! <<
in that case - i will! :E
Keith with his 53 LP Goldtop - the first one looks like the same sessions as some of the above,
and since one of our very sharp-eyed cohorts once pointed out that bit of idiosyncratically-bent excess string
that's identical in both shots, the second one is likely to be from the same timeframe:
- 1966 (apparently feb/mar) by Stu
- 1966 (apparently feb/mar too) by Stu, courtesy of outtake.co.uk