For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
dewlover
"I've never been able to put my finger on why Silver Train doesn't sound better"
That's because they stole it from Johnny Winter...
Quote
dewlover
"I've never been able to put my finger on why Silver Train doesn't sound better"
That's because they stole it from Johnny Winter...
Quote
electricmudQuote
dewlover
"I've never been able to put my finger on why Silver Train doesn't sound better"
That's because they stole it from Johnny Winter...
Completly wrong. The basic track is from 1970, they had different versions over the next 2 years and in 1973 allowed J Winter to publish it first. The same happened with Wild Horses which was first published by the Flying Burrito Brothers in 1969 like everybody knows..
Quote
Mathijs
The basic track is from '69 actually.
Quote
His Majesty
I had a go at covering Coming Down Again today.
Quote
Filip020169
OOPS... I started a 'seperate' thread about half an hour ago on this (I will remove it asap); not realising this was already 'in discussion'. So here's my thoughts on this:
...yesterday evening, when I was listening to GHS a couple of times start-to-finish I thought to myself: wouldn't that album have had a greater (first) impact, made a bigger impression so to speak, if the 3d track "Coming down again" had been placed at the end of the album?!
I mean: listen to it... "Dancing with mr. D", "100 years ago", and thén slipping into "Heartbreaker"... That's a catharsis of grooves, isn't it?? I know this probably seems like 'splitting hairs', but I'm truely convinced about the importance of a natural order of things- and yesterday, I felt like "Coming down again" somehow broke that inherent order, and therefor shot the album in the foot.
I see that some of you prefer to ditch the track completely, but I wouldn't go that far; to me, "Coming down..." could very well be placed after or just before "Star Star". But: definitely at the end.
The original LP would then have been something like this:
SIDE A
Dancing with mr. D
100 years ago
Doo doo doo doo doo (Heartbreaker)
Angie
Hide your love
SIDE B
Winter
Can you hear the music
(Coming down again?)
Star star
(Coming down again?)
..What's your thoughts on this!?
Quote
kleermakerQuote
Filip020169
OOPS... I started a 'seperate' thread about half an hour ago on this (I will remove it asap); not realising this was already 'in discussion'. So here's my thoughts on this:
...yesterday evening, when I was listening to GHS a couple of times start-to-finish I thought to myself: wouldn't that album have had a greater (first) impact, made a bigger impression so to speak, if the 3d track "Coming down again" had been placed at the end of the album?!
I mean: listen to it... "Dancing with mr. D", "100 years ago", and thén slipping into "Heartbreaker"... That's a catharsis of grooves, isn't it?? I know this probably seems like 'splitting hairs', but I'm truely convinced about the importance of a natural order of things- and yesterday, I felt like "Coming down again" somehow broke that inherent order, and therefor shot the album in the foot.
I see that some of you prefer to ditch the track completely, but I wouldn't go that far; to me, "Coming down..." could very well be placed after or just before "Star Star". But: definitely at the end.
The original LP would then have been something like this:
SIDE A
Dancing with mr. D
100 years ago
Doo doo doo doo doo (Heartbreaker)
Angie
Hide your love
SIDE B
Winter
Can you hear the music
(Coming down again?)
Star star
(Coming down again?)
..What's your thoughts on this!?
I agree with Angie and Coming down again at the end of each side. But think of the fact that most people (like me) listen to the CD, with only one side!
So this would be my choice:
1. Mr D
2. 100 years
3. Heartbreaker
4. Silver train
5. Angie
6. Star
7. Hide your love
8. Winter
9. Can't you hear the music
10. Coming down again
Anyway, to me GHS belongs to the big six (Ya Ya's included).
Quote
Filip020169
OOPS... I started a 'seperate' thread about half an hour ago on this (I will remove it asap); not realising this was already 'in discussion'. So here's my thoughts on this:
...yesterday evening, when I was listening to GHS a couple of times start-to-finish I thought to myself: wouldn't that album have had a greater (first) impact, made a bigger impression so to speak, if the 3d track "Coming down again" had been placed at the end of the album?!
I mean: listen to it... "Dancing with mr. D", "100 years ago", and thén slipping into "Heartbreaker"... That's a catharsis of grooves, isn't it?? I know this probably seems like 'splitting hairs', but I'm truely convinced about the importance of a natural order of things- and yesterday, I felt like "Coming down again" somehow broke that inherent order, and therefor shot the album in the foot.
I see that some of you prefer to ditch the track completely, but I wouldn't go that far; to me, "Coming down..." could very well be placed after or just before "Star Star". But: definitely at the end.
The original LP would then have been something like this:
SIDE A
Dancing with mr. D
100 years ago
Doo doo doo doo doo (Heartbreaker)
Angie
Hide your love
SIDE B
Winter
Can you hear the music
(Coming down again?)
Star star
(Coming down again?)
..What's your thoughts on this!?
Quote
DandelionPowderman
IMO, disappointing sound and production on GHS. The mood of the album is a little lazy.
Quote
DandelionPowderman
Also gives an impression of the band being at its best when everybody are playing on each song, imo.