For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
keefriffhard4lifeQuote
melillo
hey gene when that band that you are in gets in the hall of fame then you can talk smack , until then keep it shut boy, btw with all the kiss lineup changes there are gonna be more people on stage then there will be in the audience
thats a ridiculous argument. we all know the HOF has a hate on for hard rock/metal and always has. list of bands not in the HOF but are eligible are:
cheap trick
rush
deep purple
alice cooper
judas priest
iron maiden
motorhead
stevie ray vaughan
yes
are none of those people better musicians than the stones? i believe just the guys rush and yes play circles around the stones and lets not even start about the godlike talent of SRV. also cheap trick is so underrated not even the HOF sees how great they are.
official members of the rolling stones= at least 6
official members of KISS= 10
not a huge difference considering eric carr died in the early 90's so he had to be replaced due to death and mark st john got an injury after 1 album that prevented him from playing guitar so subtract the 2 people replaced for health reasons and thats only 8 members
Quote
whitem8
The biggest difference is that The Rolling Stones are one of the best rock bands in history. They have written some of the most important statements in music and they are all incredibly organic and passionate musicians. KISS....well...not much you can say other than manufactured, pretentious, and totally passionless music...oh and lets not forget they are complete posers.
Quote
Wild Slivovitz
If Rolling Stones are a "Vegas Act", then how should Kiss be rated???
Quote
dcba
What is Kiss? A cash machine. Zero artistic or musical content.
Had S&S been born a little later they would have worked for Goldman Sachs selling 500K houses to jobless people...
Quote
stones78
KISS...no artistic merits at all, no subtlety, no diversity, no soul, no brain...what's not to like?
Quote
keefriffhard4lifeQuote
whitem8
The biggest difference is that The Rolling Stones are one of the best rock bands in history. They have written some of the most important statements in music and they are all incredibly organic and passionate musicians. KISS....well...not much you can say other than manufactured, pretentious, and totally passionless music...oh and lets not forget they are complete posers.
Quote
whitem8Quote
keefriffhard4lifeQuote
whitem8
The biggest difference is that The Rolling Stones are one of the best rock bands in history. They have written some of the most important statements in music and they are all incredibly organic and passionate musicians. KISS....well...not much you can say other than manufactured, pretentious, and totally passionless music...oh and lets not forget they are complete posers.
Yes, my point, that is TERRIBLE! Just cookie cutter comic book rock. Taking from Bowie and Alice Cooper, but with none of the passion from those artists. Just a plastic manufactured blueprint for commercial success.
Quote
stones78
KISS...no artistic merits at all, no subtlety, no diversity, no soul, no brain...what's not to like?
Quote
You Got to Roll Me
yeah and notice the 3 dozen people in the audience was this on there tour of high school gyms and rec centers