Apples & Oranges man. Different bands, different eras, different sounds...
I will say though that U2 is not as musically myopic as how charles describes them. Same sound?? Really?? They have very different eras in their catalouge. I do really like how the band is the same 4 guys from the beginning, since they were all in high school.
Bono? Preachy? Yeah - 20 years ago. The fun of the whole ZOOTV tour was what made me a fan again after Rattle & Hum. In '88 I was sick of u2. '91 witness the most successful sound change and image reboot since.... anything before my time (Sgt. Pepper's comes to mind).
The biggest difference is that U2 seems to have creatively peaked in 2000 with All That You Can't Leave Behind. The Stones peak was almost 20 years before that. Both are nostalgic acts to some extent nowadays, one just less dusty than the other.
U2
in their prime comes nowhere near the Stones
in their prime though, for me. Hmmm, this thread is making me think about this more than I'd thought it would!
[
thepowergoats.com]