For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
pmk251
Speaking of TD... At the start of the closing riff Taylor is tinkling those notes.
Quote
ccQuote
pmk251
Speaking of TD... At the start of the closing riff Taylor is tinkling those notes.
yes! - while I don't recall hearing the spoken comments you mention, I've long noticed that this section of "Tumbling Dice" seems to have been a problem as far as what taylor should play. The "tinkling" at this point of the number is something that it seems to me he grew more committed to as the tour went on -- I guess despite mick and keith's dislike for it?
I agree with them, the part that goes "da-da-PLINK! da-da-PLINK! da-da-PLINK" at the end of the "got to roll me" refrains always stands out as inappropriately baroque or dramatic for the Stones ... it sounds like something on Born to Run. It's an example of taylor's true instincts not quite fitting the band, imo.
Quote
pmk251
One thing I always admired is Jagger's on stage instincts and awareness A year or so later during TD (Brussels, of course) he tells Taylor "Keep on doin' that" and rides his lead guitarist to a thrilling finish. If Jagger did not like the tinkling notes in '72, he did not mind the repetitive notes in '73. But throughout those years and from the very first shows in '69 he was SO tuned in to what Taylor was doing. I cannot remember the word he used in that '95 RS mag interview: He (Taylor) gave me something to bang (something like that) off of.
Quote
pmk251
One thing I always admired is Jagger's on stage instincts and awareness A year or so later during TD (Brussels, of course) he tells Taylor "Keep on doin' that" and rides his lead guitarist to a thrilling finish. If Jagger did not like the tinkling notes in '72, he did not mind the repetitive notes in '73. But throughout those years and from the very first shows in '69 he was SO tuned in to what Taylor was doing. I cannot remember the word he used in that '95 RS mag interview: He (Taylor) gave me something to bang (something like that) off of.
Quote
kleermakerQuote
ccQuote
pmk251
Speaking of TD... At the start of the closing riff Taylor is tinkling those notes.
yes! - while I don't recall hearing the spoken comments you mention, I've long noticed that this section of "Tumbling Dice" seems to have been a problem as far as what taylor should play. The "tinkling" at this point of the number is something that it seems to me he grew more committed to as the tour went on -- I guess despite mick and keith's dislike for it?
I agree with them, the part that goes "da-da-PLINK! da-da-PLINK! da-da-PLINK" at the end of the "got to roll me" refrains always stands out as inappropriately baroque or dramatic for the Stones ... it sounds like something on Born to Run. It's an example of taylor's true instincts not quite fitting the band, imo.
But they gave him inarguably more room during the 1973 tour. Taylor at that point had grown more committed to the band than ever before. The 1972 tour is an example of Taylor's true instincts extremely well fitting the band, resulting in lifting the band to its ultimate live peak in 1973. Brussels is an example of it.
Quote
ccQuote
kleermakerQuote
ccQuote
pmk251
Speaking of TD... At the start of the closing riff Taylor is tinkling those notes.
yes! - while I don't recall hearing the spoken comments you mention, I've long noticed that this section of "Tumbling Dice" seems to have been a problem as far as what taylor should play. The "tinkling" at this point of the number is something that it seems to me he grew more committed to as the tour went on -- I guess despite mick and keith's dislike for it?
I agree with them, the part that goes "da-da-PLINK! da-da-PLINK! da-da-PLINK" at the end of the "got to roll me" refrains always stands out as inappropriately baroque or dramatic for the Stones ... it sounds like something on Born to Run. It's an example of taylor's true instincts not quite fitting the band, imo.
But they gave him inarguably more room during the 1973 tour. Taylor at that point had grown more committed to the band than ever before. The 1972 tour is an example of Taylor's true instincts extremely well fitting the band, resulting in lifting the band to its ultimate live peak in 1973. Brussels is an example of it.
this is a general theory--do you know the specific part pmk and I are talking about?
Quote
cc
I agree with them, the part that goes "da-da-PLINK! da-da-PLINK! da-da-PLINK" at the end of the "got to roll me" refrains always stands out as inappropriately baroque or dramatic for the Stones ... it sounds like something on Born to Run. It's an example of taylor's true instincts not quite fitting the band, imo.
Quote
kleermaker
Of course I do and I listened to it again. A beautiful part, though the chords Taylor plays after it (more pregnant in other versions during that tour) are beautiful too. But the counterpoint-like tinkling is great. At the end of the FW 2nd TD-version Jagger says (in my ears at least) "Watch out, son". Imo Jagger himself liked the tinkling but he remembered Keith's attitude/sensibility (the Houston 1st TD "Stop That" by Keith is proof of that sensibility). His friendly warning ("Watch out, son" ) the day before, and especially the way he says it, tells me that Jagger himself had no problem with Taylor's 'noodling' and 'tinkling'. Ultimate proof is the 1973 tour. Well, that's my theory. The Jagger quote up here doesn't refute it.
Quote
Smokey
My recollection is that Hopkins is the source for this earlier in the tour, and Taylor later mimicked it.
Quote
ccQuote
kleermakerQuote
ccQuote
pmk251
Speaking of TD... At the start of the closing riff Taylor is tinkling those notes.
yes! - while I don't recall hearing the spoken comments you mention, I've long noticed that this section of "Tumbling Dice" seems to have been a problem as far as what taylor should play. The "tinkling" at this point of the number is something that it seems to me he grew more committed to as the tour went on -- I guess despite mick and keith's dislike for it?
I agree with them, the part that goes "da-da-PLINK! da-da-PLINK! da-da-PLINK" at the end of the "got to roll me" refrains always stands out as inappropriately baroque or dramatic for the Stones ... it sounds like something on Born to Run. It's an example of taylor's true instincts not quite fitting the band, imo.
But they gave him inarguably more room during the 1973 tour. Taylor at that point had grown more committed to the band than ever before. The 1972 tour is an example of Taylor's true instincts extremely well fitting the band, resulting in lifting the band to its ultimate live peak in 1973. Brussels is an example of it.
this is a general theory--do you know the specific part pmk and I are talking about?
Quote
stones78
There are only 3 guitars on the song, Mick's acoustic in the center, Keith's on the left and Taylor on the right...during the verses Keith plays the fills and Taylor arpegiates the chords, then on the choruses Taylor plays very similar fills and Keith does those "pedal steel-like" bends which he does during Mick's solo too. Mick said he used a Gibson ES-345.
Quote
kleermakerQuote
ccQuote
kleermakerQuote
ccQuote
pmk251
Speaking of TD... At the start of the closing riff Taylor is tinkling those notes.
yes! - while I don't recall hearing the spoken comments you mention, I've long noticed that this section of "Tumbling Dice" seems to have been a problem as far as what taylor should play. The "tinkling" at this point of the number is something that it seems to me he grew more committed to as the tour went on -- I guess despite mick and keith's dislike for it?
I agree with them, the part that goes "da-da-PLINK! da-da-PLINK! da-da-PLINK" at the end of the "got to roll me" refrains always stands out as inappropriately baroque or dramatic for the Stones ... it sounds like something on Born to Run. It's an example of taylor's true instincts not quite fitting the band, imo.
But they gave him inarguably more room during the 1973 tour. Taylor at that point had grown more committed to the band than ever before. The 1972 tour is an example of Taylor's true instincts extremely well fitting the band, resulting in lifting the band to its ultimate live peak in 1973. Brussels is an example of it.
this is a general theory--do you know the specific part pmk and I are talking about?
Of course I do and I listened to it again. A beautiful part, though the chords Taylor plays after it (more pregnant in other versions during that tour) are beautiful too. But the counterpoint-like tinkling is great. At the end of the FW 2nd TD-version Jagger says (in my ears at least) "Watch out, son". Imo Jagger himself liked the tinkling but he remembered Keith's attitude/sensibility (the Houston 1st TD "Stop That" by Keith is proof of that sensibility). t, tells me that Jagger himself had no problem with Taylor's 'noodling' and 'tinkling'. Ultimate proof is the 1973 tour. Well, that's my theory. The Jagger quote up here doesn't refute it.
Quote
cc
by "strange question," I'll assume you don't mean that we should all be aware of precisely what's in your Youtube archive.
Quote
glimmertwin50
In Guitar Player in 1980, Taylor says he played the studio solo on "Dead Flowers". The phrasing indicates it is Taylor. He certainly more freely and fluidly improvised the live solos of this song, but I'm inclined to believe it is Taylor playing this solo in the studio.
Quote
stupidguy2
When was it that Keith yelled at Mick to turn down?
quote]
I am talking about the TD performance in the L&G movie. Mid-point in the song at the beginning of the closing riff Keith steps back, looks Taylor's direction and if I am reading his lips correctly says "Stop that!" Then he physically demonstrates what he wants played. Watch it. You will see it.
That is a bit different than the '81 KC show where (as the story goes) Keith told Taylor to turn down the volume.
Quote
pmk251Quote
stupidguy2
When was it that Keith yelled at Mick to turn down?
quote]
I am talking about the TD performance in the L&G movie. Mid-point in the song at the beginning of the closing riff Keith steps back, looks Taylor's direction and if I am reading his lips correctly says "Stop that!" Then he physically demonstrates what he wants played. Watch it. You will see it.
That is a bit different than the '81 KC show where (as the story goes) Keith told Taylor to turn down the volume.
It's when Taylor starts noodling these jazzy runs that indeed are a bit misplaced. Keith turns around and yells "stop @#$%& around" to Taylor.
Mathijs
Quote
Mathijs
quote]
It's when Taylor starts noodling these jazzy runs that indeed are a bit misplaced. Keith turns around and yells "stop @#$%& around" to Taylor.
Mathijs
Quote
AmsterdamnedQuote
glimmertwin50
In Guitar Player in 1980, Taylor says he played the studio solo on "Dead Flowers". The phrasing indicates it is Taylor. He certainly more freely and fluidly improvised the live solos of this song, but I'm inclined to believe it is Taylor playing this solo in the studio.
I bet it's Taylor.
Quote
71Tele
<< this is maybe the only stones song where keith doesn´t play the guitar solo live, he played in the studio...>>
Dead Flowers
Gimme Shelter
I'm sure there are others...
Quote
Tumblin_Dice_07
We've had this discussion about the "Dead Flowers" solo before. It's Taylor. Keith plays some fills, but Taylor plays the solo. Taylor himself says so.
I don't really know why some people think it's Keith. To me, just judging by the style of play, I'm 100% sure it's Taylor.
Quote
kleermakerQuote
ccQuote
pmk251
Speaking of TD... At the start of the closing riff Taylor is tinkling those notes.
yes! - while I don't recall hearing the spoken comments you mention, I've long noticed that this section of "Tumbling Dice" seems to have been a problem as far as what taylor should play. The "tinkling" at this point of the number is something that it seems to me he grew more committed to as the tour went on -- I guess despite mick and keith's dislike for it?
I agree with them, the part that goes "da-da-PLINK! da-da-PLINK! da-da-PLINK" at the end of the "got to roll me" refrains always stands out as inappropriately baroque or dramatic for the Stones ... it sounds like something on Born to Run. It's an example of taylor's true instincts not quite fitting the band, imo.
But they gave him inarguably more room during the 1973 tour. Taylor at that point had grown more committed to the band than ever before. The 1972 tour is an example of Taylor's true instincts extremely well fitting the band, resulting in lifting the band to its ultimate live peak in 1973. Brussels is an example of it.