For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
stonesmuziekfan
Thanks, the one in Stonesvault appeared to be lossy.
I also will check the other ones by Save The Earth publisher and fix what needs to be fixed.
Quote
Tonstone
Let me know if you need Vol5 & Vol6 I have these also on a silver 2 cd set on RR010 & RR011.
Quote
stonesmuziekfan
I was gardening this afternoon and just now checked the here uploaded Place Pigalle.
Although coming from silvers it looks very LOSSY
Frequence Analysis with Audacty
kHz
01 13.000
02 11.700
03 14.500
04 14.000
05 12.100
06 9.300
07 12.100
08 13.000
09 8.100
10 11.500
11 11.200
12 10.500
13 10.800
14 11.300
The one I uploaded in Stonesvault is size 270 MB while Tonstone's is slightly bigger with 293 MB
Quote
buffalo7478
Could it be the source material lacked higher frequencies?
Quote
Massimo68Quote
buffalo7478
Could it be the source material lacked higher frequencies?
I guess you're right :
[/qu
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2018-08-26 09:48 by Tonstone.
Thanks Blakeeik, for your balanced reply. I will be more careful with what I post in future.Quote
blakeeik
Hey Tonstone,
No worries about the criticism. You uploaded a Silver CD. They are just comparing your files with other files that they were afraid were not from a secure rip.
It’s not a good practice to upload lossy files. But yours are not lossy when you consider the source was found that way. Lossy files must be compared to a source. It’s not right to judge them only based upon the lack of high frequencies. That is a common way to determine if the source was MP3, but it is not correct to assume that the source had high frequencies.
The bottom line is your rip is fine, it just doesn’t have the higher frequencies. Not your fault, blame the manufacturer.