For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
with sssoul
LoFL: glad that isn't an example of your courtroom finesse -
what bv said is that he doesn't want smileys in the subject lines of threads.
and popcorn is an excellent source of dietary roughage - you should try it! :E
on with the regularly scheduled thread & good health to you
Quote
Happy24
It is quite obvious what happened there - a fan got on stage, run accross and Keith hit him with his tele. That is what I could see from the video. But I am sure there is some story, that at the time when it happened it was discussed, maybe Keith gave some explanation. I was 4 and I didn't know about any Stones back then, but I am sure many people here can give me some background. It was a year after Lennon was killed, so I think that people were somehow very sensitive to things like that, maybe even the Stones were frightened. Maybe it was just some fan who wanted to get close to the band, but maybe he had some bad intentions. So please let me know what are the known facts...Thanx
Quote
GazzaQuote
Paul KerseyQuote
baxlapQuote
Paul Kersey
Quality R&R. When that guy attacked Oasis, even thought there was nothing Noel could do it all looked abit pathetic. The Hampton incident is what its all about!
Noel Gallagher was hit from behind and never saw that bastard coming. The guy in Hampton was in front of Keef, who had time to nail him with the black Tele.
I doubt Noel would have done what Keith did :-)
Yeah - he probably would have connected properly.
Pretty laughable comment to describe his reaction to being whacked from behind as "pathetic"....