For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
czr
The Stones should start their next tour on top of the Ed Sullivan theatre.
Quote
Rockman
Letterman said.....
Mick Jagger...65 years old isn't that remarkable ...65years old ...good for him ....good for Mick Jagger
It's just too bad Keith Richards isn't alive to see this
Phish did that.Quote
czr
The Stones should start their next tour on top of the Ed Sullivan theatre.
Quote
TrulyMicksQuote
Rockman
Letterman said.....
Mick Jagger...65 years old isn't that remarkable ...65years old ...good for him ....good for Mick Jagger
It's just too bad Keith Richards isn't alive to see this
Am I missing something? I think Letterman has always been very jealous of the Glimmers.
Quote
ryanpow
and let me guess, that was followed by Paul Shaffer going "aaaaaaaaahhhh hah!!!!
Quote
TrulyMicks
maybe it's just his job.
Quote
RockmanThe rest with [b
Paul Shaffer[/b] went like this....
Letterman said.....
Mick Jagger...65 years old isn't that remarkable ...65years old ...good for him ....good for Mick Jagger
It's just too bad Keith Richards isn't alive to see this...................Or is he....is he alive?
Paul Shaffer.... No he is
Letterman ..... Oh!!! He is alive!
Paul Shaffer yelling ..... VERY MUCH SO
Quote
TrulyMicksQuote
Rockman
Letterman said.....
Mick Jagger...65 years old isn't that remarkable ...65years old ...good for him ....good for Mick Jagger
It's just too bad Keith Richards isn't alive to see this
Am I missing something? I think Letterman has always been very jealous of the Glimmers.
Quote
paulywaulQuote
TrulyMicksQuote
Rockman
Letterman said.....
Mick Jagger...65 years old isn't that remarkable ...65years old ...good for him ....good for Mick Jagger
It's just too bad Keith Richards isn't alive to see this
Am I missing something? I think Letterman has always been very jealous of the Glimmers.
Nope, you're not missing anything at all. To the contrary, you hit the nail precisely on the head. The sad thing is, and Letterman looks the worse for it, is that he can't hide that jealousy ... so he decides to go the route of making what he thinks are humourous remarks, and ends up looking a bit of a twit as a consequence. You'd have thought he'd have known better, or at least I would.
Quote
JustinQuote
paulywaulQuote
TrulyMicksQuote
Rockman
Letterman said.....
Mick Jagger...65 years old isn't that remarkable ...65years old ...good for him ....good for Mick Jagger
It's just too bad Keith Richards isn't alive to see this
Am I missing something? I think Letterman has always been very jealous of the Glimmers.
Nope, you're not missing anything at all. To the contrary, you hit the nail precisely on the head. The sad thing is, and Letterman looks the worse for it, is that he can't hide that jealousy ... so he decides to go the route of making what he thinks are humourous remarks, and ends up looking a bit of a twit as a consequence. You'd have thought he'd have known better, or at least I would.
Letterman is a late night host...among the many that are out there. Their DUTY is to provide jokes for the masses. The usual jokes these hosts have at their disposal range from George W. Bush, Paris Hilton, Britney Spears, John McCain and yes even are beloved Rolling Stones. To attatch a psychological study on Letterman or any other comedian who makes a comment towards the Stones is pointless as these guys need a joke for their monologue. They'll take anything they can find.
The writers don't go and ask Dave..."Dave, do you have a private jealousy towards the Stones? If so, we can make you a couple nice zingers about their old age. Would you like that?"
It's assumed everyone will laugh at a Stones/age joke... Nothing more...nothing less Freudian about it. It's all but funny to the Stones fans of course.