For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
SonicDreamer
just wait until Paulywaul gets his typing fingers on to this thread, fireworks, pyrotechnic overload? Nahhhhhhh far too f*ckin' namby pamby. Cataclysmic eruptions of Vesuvian proportions more like.
SD
Quote
Barn Owl
Much as we like to question the morals of scalpers when they rip us off by buying all the good seats and then screwing us for a king's ransom, the same guys DO come in handy when we are desperate for a ticket.
I've bought from scalpers on very rare occasions, and I have to say, regretfully, that it has always been worth it.
A double-edged sword.
Quote
Gazza
Scalpers are generally only going to care about or make their money on the best seats. If you use a method to take those out of the ticket-selling system by not having them onsale along with the rest of the tickets, then you reduce the problem.
It CAN be done for the most part by, for example, selling tickets for the first 15-20 rows of an arena/stadium show in the same way that its done for all tickets to a theatre show (using Stones shows as an example) - ie using will-call,a 2-ticket limit, wristbands, photo ID etc. For the upcoming Tom Waits shows, they not only use this system but you have to give the name of the person who's taking your second ticket within a few days of your purchase.
If there's a will, it can be done. Unfortunately, as was the case with an act who shall remain nameless, when you advertise ticket prices for shows in your home city at £70-150 but then dont make any of the tickets available (even in fan club presales) for the first ten rows when they first go on sale, but siphon them off to brokers and extortionately priced travel companies who then sell them on at double or triple the price (or more), it tends to give the impression that you couldnt care less and are, in fact, financially benefitting from it.
That's also scalping as far as I'm concerned.
Quote
Barn Owl
A few days before the first London O2 show, ticketmaster were selling scores of £165 tickets in the first six rows.
Quote
KSIE
I'm sure every person on this board would like to have a front row-center seat, at a nominal price, for every single concert they want to see. I'm sure that every band would like to fill every seat in a large stadium at an extraordinary price per ticket. Neither of these is going to happen. The solution to these conflicting "wants" is the setting of a price for concert seats where both the buyer and the seller maximize what they want/need. Ticket brokers greatly enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of this process.
Why is it any more fair that somebody with a fast computer, or the ability to wait in line all night, or with some kind of personal connection should get better seats than me? Why should the Stones (or anyone else) get 50 euros for a seat for which somebody would gladly pay 80 euros? The larger and more liquid/transparent the market is, the better the "true-value" of the seat is determined. I'm with sladog on this one.
Quote
GazzaQuote
Barn Owl
A few days before the first London O2 show, ticketmaster were selling scores of £165 tickets in the first six rows.
Yes..they were almost certainly the surplus tickets that the likes of Fan Asylum couldnt get rid of and which went back into the system again. Similarly with the unsold 'hot seat' tickets which were sold at £100 over face value.
I did quantify in my above post that they werent available when the shows "first went on sale".
Quote
bv
Scalpers i.e. ticket brokers handle 30% of all tickets sold in USA according to Pollstar. What happens is the brokers make deals directly with the source of ticket sales like Ticketmaster. Then they pay off these guys to get large blocks of premier seats, that never get offered to the public. In theory ticket broking is about free market, in reality it is about corruption.
Quote
bv
is luckily getting illegal in more and more markets.
Quote
GazzaQuote
KSIE
I'm sure every person on this board would like to have a front row-center seat, at a nominal price, for every single concert they want to see. I'm sure that every band would like to fill every seat in a large stadium at an extraordinary price per ticket. Neither of these is going to happen. The solution to these conflicting "wants" is the setting of a price for concert seats where both the buyer and the seller maximize what they want/need. Ticket brokers greatly enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of this process.
Why is it any more fair that somebody with a fast computer, or the ability to wait in line all night, or with some kind of personal connection should get better seats than me? Why should the Stones (or anyone else) get 50 euros for a seat for which somebody would gladly pay 80 euros? The larger and more liquid/transparent the market is, the better the "true-value" of the seat is determined. I'm with sladog on this one.
Fine, then. But if bands like the Stones are prepared to hold tickets back and sell them for, say, £1,000- £2,000, then announce that publicly and let them and Cohl deal with the flak and discontent that will ensue. At least they should be honest and transparent about it.
What they shouldnt do is insult people's intelligence by saying the maximum price for category 1 tickets is £150/$450 - when there is actually a 'hidden' market and the REAL category 1 tickets are ONLY going to go to people who are willing to pay double that.
Promising fans priority ticket allocation in presales, getting them to pay for the privilege and then just offering them shit when the best tickets are never going to be made available is a pretty reprehensible practice