For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
GazzaQuote
LOGIE
Excellent!!!
Let's see whether Pauly's cheese-on-toast is all it's made out to be.
He has a great garden, is a magnificent host (as is Ms. Paulywaul) and his fridge is well equipped with beer. One cant ask for more.
After he's got us suitably refreshed we can beat him up for his recent Bruce blasphemies.
Quote
timbernardis
i would imagine there will not be as much emphasis on Endless Wire on this tour. They usually change things up at least from tour to tour.
I wouldnt worry about the set list anyway with a band of their stature. Like the Stones, I will see them over and over.
p
Quote
BluzDude
What's the price range?
Quote
tatters
By the way, you DO know that Brian was a FORMER Rolling Stone at the time of his death, right?
Quote
tippy2toes
So are what are they promoting? A new cd.
Quote
Happy Jack
Trainarollin, I agree about You Better You Bet. Its not one of my favorite Who Songs. Off of Face Dances I rather like Dont Let Go the Coat or Another Tricky Day instead. And stoned in washington DC, im gonna defend my favorite group here
"they are promoting their bank accounts", the same applies to the lengthy Bigger Bang tour, which by the end of it the Stones werent even playing any songs from that album. "that says something considering the shit he's been writing for the past 25 years". Have you listened to the stones material in the last 25 years? None of it even comes close to their worst efforts in the 70s. Voodoo Lounge had a good sound to it, but there is nothing on there that I listen to over and over again. Bridges to Babylon? the only good song on there is Saint of Me, and the stones dont even really recognize it anymore. Bigger Bang: a decent album but filled with too much generic rock. It seems lifeless to me. I hope Ive made my point, but i will restate it: Petes writing doesnt come anywhere near his efforts in the 60s and 70s just as the Stones efforts dont come anywhere near there efforts from the say period. However, in both cases there are moments of brilliance in amongst alot of crap.
Quote
stoned in washington dcQuote
Happy Jack
Trainarollin, I agree about You Better You Bet. Its not one of my favorite Who Songs. Off of Face Dances I rather like Dont Let Go the Coat or Another Tricky Day instead. And stoned in washington DC, im gonna defend my favorite group here
"they are promoting their bank accounts", the same applies to the lengthy Bigger Bang tour, which by the end of it the Stones werent even playing any songs from that album. "that says something considering the shit he's been writing for the past 25 years". Have you listened to the stones material in the last 25 years? None of it even comes close to their worst efforts in the 70s. Voodoo Lounge had a good sound to it, but there is nothing on there that I listen to over and over again. Bridges to Babylon? the only good song on there is Saint of Me, and the stones dont even really recognize it anymore. Bigger Bang: a decent album but filled with too much generic rock. It seems lifeless to me. I hope Ive made my point, but i will restate it: Petes writing doesnt come anywhere near his efforts in the 60s and 70s just as the Stones efforts dont come anywhere near there efforts from the say period. However, in both cases there are moments of brilliance in amongst alot of crap.
happy jack, please refrain from being offtopic on the offtopic thread of the who... this is not about the stones..
pete has stated- this year- that he cant write anymore cause the stuff he is writing is shit... period end of story.. don't defend the guy when even he is admitting he can't write anymore...
Quote
stoned in washington dcQuote
Happy Jack
Trainarollin, I agree about You Better You Bet. Its not one of my favorite Who Songs. Off of Face Dances I rather like Dont Let Go the Coat or Another Tricky Day instead. And stoned in washington DC, im gonna defend my favorite group here
"they are promoting their bank accounts", the same applies to the lengthy Bigger Bang tour, which by the end of it the Stones werent even playing any songs from that album. "that says something considering the shit he's been writing for the past 25 years". Have you listened to the stones material in the last 25 years? None of it even comes close to their worst efforts in the 70s. Voodoo Lounge had a good sound to it, but there is nothing on there that I listen to over and over again. Bridges to Babylon? the only good song on there is Saint of Me, and the stones dont even really recognize it anymore. Bigger Bang: a decent album but filled with too much generic rock. It seems lifeless to me. I hope Ive made my point, but i will restate it: Petes writing doesnt come anywhere near his efforts in the 60s and 70s just as the Stones efforts dont come anywhere near there efforts from the say period. However, in both cases there are moments of brilliance in amongst alot of crap.
happy jack, please refrain from being offtopic on the offtopic thread of the who... this is not about the stones..
pete has stated- this year- that he cant write anymore cause the stuff he is writing is shit... period end of story.. don't defend the guy when even he is admitting he can't write anymore...
Quote
trainarollin
$430.00 for VIP seating. That could be first sections on floor and first couple side sections.
Quote
ablett
Some of Iron Man was good, so to with Psychoderelict.
Endless Wire had some fine moments.
Quote
tattersQuote
trainarollin
$430.00 for VIP seating. That could be first sections on floor and first couple side sections.
"It's great to see all the old faces down front"
--Peter Townshend
"Don't be a sucker"
--John Entwistle
Quote
ablett
Tea and Theatre is one of their best for a long time.....