Tell Me :
Talk
Not a little. WAY too fast. That was the case with many songs on that tour IMO.
JumpingKentFlash
I knew the live version first, so the studio version seemed lame to me.
He wouldn't need to play it today! Ronnie would cover it all and Keith would do the occasional power chord and the same lame 3 note solo he plays on every song these days. Shame really.
They played that quite a few times in 97/98 and was last played as recently as 2003.
Talk about your favorite band.
For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
This Would Be Great To Have Back In The Set
Posted by:
CrazyDadda
()
Date: April 13, 2008 07:26
Killer Version
Re: This Would Be Great To Have Back In The Set
Posted by:
saturn57
()
Date: April 13, 2008 07:32
As long as Mick doesn't were those football pants......
Re: This Would Be Great To Have Back In The Set
Posted by:
ohnonotyouagain
()
Date: April 13, 2008 08:18
killer version indeed, and don't knock the football pants, those are all I've been wearing since 1981. they're quite comfortable. and very convenient if a football game breaks out, thank you very much!
Re: This Would Be Great To Have Back In The Set
Posted by:
North of 49
()
Date: April 13, 2008 08:56
Thanks for the post. A great song indeed. saw the do this in Boulder,Co. in '81.
Re: This Would Be Great To Have Back In The Set
Posted by:
whiskey
()
Date: April 13, 2008 11:42
I love it
Re: This Would Be Great To Have Back In The Set
Posted by:
JumpingKentFlash
()
Date: April 13, 2008 14:51
Always found this one pretty forgettable.
JumpingKentFlash
JumpingKentFlash
Re: This Would Be Great To Have Back In The Set
Posted by:
virgil
()
Date: April 13, 2008 15:10
I love the studio version ,I just think live ,it was done a little too fast.
Re: This Would Be Great To Have Back In The Set
Posted by:
JumpingKentFlash
()
Date: April 13, 2008 15:15
Quote
virgil
I love the studio version ,I just think live ,it was done a little too fast.
Not a little. WAY too fast. That was the case with many songs on that tour IMO.
JumpingKentFlash
Re: This Would Be Great To Have Back In The Set
Posted by:
Theif in the Night
()
Date: April 14, 2008 03:55
It might be nice to see Let Me Go return but,I would pick some other rarely (or never) played songs first.Summer Romance from the same album might be a better selection.I believe that Let Me Go was rehearsed in January 2006.
Re: This Would Be Great To Have Back In The Set
Posted by:
melillo
()
Date: April 14, 2008 04:41
wonder how keith would feel about the lemmon yellow tights if they would surface again, cmon mick break out the old football gear
Re: This Would Be Great To Have Back In The Set
Posted by:
stoned in washington dc
()
Date: April 14, 2008 08:19
man there's no way keith could play that today! don't you guys notice how much cleaner he was playing back then?
Re: This Would Be Great To Have Back In The Set
Posted by:
TooTough
()
Date: April 14, 2008 08:30
Quote
virgil
I love the studio version ,I just think live ,it was done a little too fast.
I knew the live version first, so the studio version seemed lame to me.
Re: This Would Be Great To Have Back In The Set
Posted by:
Roll73
()
Date: April 14, 2008 14:29
Quote
stoned in washington dc
man there's no way keith could play that today! don't you guys notice how much cleaner he was playing back then?
He wouldn't need to play it today! Ronnie would cover it all and Keith would do the occasional power chord and the same lame 3 note solo he plays on every song these days. Shame really.
Re: This Would Be Great To Have Back In The Set
Posted by:
Baboon Bro
()
Date: April 14, 2008 19:25
LMG sure would nice to have back.. But does it suit his voice & sing style now?
What about Star @#$%&?
What about Star @#$%&?
Re: This Would Be Great To Have Back In The Set
Posted by:
erikjjf
()
Date: April 14, 2008 20:32
Quote
Baboon Bro
What about Star @#$%&?
They played that quite a few times in 97/98 and was last played as recently as 2003.
Re: This Would Be Great To Have Back In The Set
Posted by:
Baboon Bro
()
Date: April 14, 2008 20:36
Thats good to know 
but still it hasnt been spinnin' so high up lately
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2008-04-14 20:36 by Baboon Bro.
but still it hasnt been spinnin' so high up latelyEdited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2008-04-14 20:36 by Baboon Bro.
Re: This Would Be Great To Have Back In The Set
Posted by:
erikjjf
()
Date: April 14, 2008 20:37
It's on Four Flicks.
Re: This Would Be Great To Have Back In The Set
Posted by:
Baboon Bro
()
Date: April 14, 2008 20:40
Just suggested a good song, actually imho the crispiest & most
orginmal yet most traitional-refined rock and roll-song the ever did.
And I dont own The Flicks.
orginmal yet most traitional-refined rock and roll-song the ever did.
And I dont own The Flicks.
Re: This Would Be Great To Have Back In The Set
Posted by:
The Stones
()
Date: April 14, 2008 20:45
Killer version indeed. Fast and awesome.
Re: This Would Be Great To Have Back In The Set
Posted by:
Baboon Bro
()
Date: April 14, 2008 20:47
Many of the ER songs could be dusted off..
Picture "Down In The Hole"...
Picture "Down In The Hole"...
Re: This Would Be Great To Have Back In The Set
Posted by:
micwer
()
Date: April 14, 2008 21:04
Come on, these pants are awesome!
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Online Users
Guests:
2224
Record Number of Users:
206
on June 1, 2022 23:50
Record Number of Guests:
9627
on January 2, 2024 23:10