Tell Me :
Talk
Clap Clap Clap
Yeah i think the record company bought copies (Hendrix), and I dont think people buy Jagger's albums anymore.
There's a saying... "the sale will never take off, before the sale has taken off"... nevertheless - saying that it's the "only reason" Jimi Hendrix got so popular is...rubbish. He came up with a completely new and seductive sound. Are You Experienced is a milestone.
Talk about your favorite band.
For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Mick peaking on the U.S dance charts (now #29)
Posted by:
georgelicks
()
Date: January 24, 2008 22:29
Mick's Charmed Life moved 46-40 on Billboard's Hot Dance Club Play Singles this week:
[www.billboard.com]
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2008-01-31 17:46 by georgelicks.
[www.billboard.com]
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2008-01-31 17:46 by georgelicks.
Re: Mick peaking on the U.S dance charts
Posted by:
Whale
()
Date: January 24, 2008 23:29
And rightly so!
Re: Mick peaking on the U.S dance charts
Posted by:
mickschix
()
Date: January 25, 2008 01:04
It's about damn time!
Re: Mick peaking on the U.S dance charts
Posted by:
Natlanta
()
Date: January 25, 2008 02:55
It's got a good beat, and it's good to dance to, so why not.
Re: Mick peaking on the U.S dance charts
Posted by:
TrulyMicks
()
Date: January 25, 2008 04:31
Well, alright.....yay Mick!
It does have a good beat, well a great beat actually. Checkin Up On My Baby and Too Many Cooks are great too. I love these new songs.
It does have a good beat, well a great beat actually. Checkin Up On My Baby and Too Many Cooks are great too. I love these new songs.
Re: Mick peaking on the U.S dance charts
Posted by:
sweet things
()
Date: January 25, 2008 08:44
Good for Mick!
Re: Mick peaking on the U.S dance charts
Posted by:
Spud
()
Date: January 25, 2008 10:20
Not good news.
We all know what happens when Mick starts to think he can have more success on his own ! ;^)
We all know what happens when Mick starts to think he can have more success on his own ! ;^)
Re: Mick peaking on the U.S dance charts
Posted by:
billwebster
()
Date: January 25, 2008 14:58
Hm, it's strange that tracks I don't quite like often seem to end up on the dance charts.
Congrats to Mick anyway.
Congrats to Mick anyway.
Re: Mick peaking on the U.S dance charts
Posted by:
leteyer
()
Date: January 25, 2008 15:04
Nice for Mick, but really a horrible song.
Re: Mick peaking on the U.S dance charts
Posted by:
hot stuff
()
Date: January 25, 2008 16:05
GREAT SONG!!!! i like it, yes i do!!
Re: Mick peaking on the U.S dance charts
Posted by:
Erik_Snow
()
Date: January 25, 2008 16:34
What sick drugs could those poor dancers be doing now ?
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2008-01-25 16:38 by Erik_Snow.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2008-01-25 16:38 by Erik_Snow.
Re: Mick peaking on the U.S dance charts
Posted by:
LA FORUM
()
Date: January 25, 2008 16:40
Strange... horrible song and... dance charts??
Re: Mick peaking on the U.S dance charts
Posted by:
rooster
()
Date: January 25, 2008 16:43
cheers mate ha ha!! Must be a love-drug!Quote
Erik_Snow
What sick drugs could those poor dancers be doing now ?
Re: Mick peaking on the U.S dance charts
Posted by:
Jimmy C
()
Date: January 25, 2008 16:57
Just to put this in perspective, the number one spot on this chart is held by Celine Dion. And Enrique Iglesias is 22 spots ahead of him at #18.
Re: Mick peaking on the U.S dance charts
Posted by:
open-g
()
Date: January 25, 2008 17:25
It's good to dance here, it's good to dance anywhere...
Re: Mick peaking on the U.S dance charts
Posted by:
Come On
()
Date: January 25, 2008 18:27
Clap Clap Clap
Re: Mick peaking on the U.S dance charts
Posted by:
john r
()
Date: January 26, 2008 11:53
Reaching # 40 will not "go to [Mick's] head", as it is a moderate success, doesn't reflect sales the way Top 200 Lps does. In fact the 12-inch "Too Much Blood" charted with similar numbers on the dance chart in January 1985, but didn't place on the Hot 100 chart, nor did TMB's middling success in clubs lead to "Undercover" returning to the album chart; the album had been released more than a year earlier, and the 2 previous singles were the tile track (charted 11/12/83, reached # 9) and 'She was Hot' (charted 2/04/84).
Re: Mick peaking on the U.S dance charts
Posted by:
georgelicks
()
Date: January 31, 2008 17:46
The song moved 40-29 this week:
[www.billboard.com]
[www.billboard.com]
Re: Mick peaking on the U.S dance charts
Posted by:
robertnight
()
Date: January 31, 2008 22:23
I wonder how many copies Mick bought?
Re: Mick peaking on the U.S dance charts
Posted by:
NICOS
()
Date: January 31, 2008 22:25
11
__________________________
__________________________
Re: Mick peaking on the U.S dance charts (now #29)
Posted by:
mickschix
()
Date: February 1, 2008 02:10
GO MICK! I love this song! Go to #1 !!
Re: Mick peaking on the U.S dance charts (now #29)
Posted by:
TrulyMicks
()
Date: February 1, 2008 02:51
Congratulations Mick!
Re: Mick peaking on the U.S dance charts (now #29)
Posted by:
James Kirk
()
Date: February 1, 2008 05:12
God bless Mick, but this has to be his single song.
Re: Mick peaking on the U.S dance charts (now #29)
Posted by:
little queenie
()
Date: February 1, 2008 10:58
maybe this is OT, but i heard today that the only reason jimi hendrix got so popular was that he was planted at the top of the charts. people wanted to have the hits of the day so bought his stuff not knowing anything about him. anyone else heard of this?
Re: Mick peaking on the U.S dance charts (now #29)
Posted by:
ablett
()
Date: February 1, 2008 12:15
Hilarious! Nothing to do with the fact he was a great artist?
Re: Mick peaking on the U.S dance charts (now #29)
Posted by:
john r
()
Date: February 2, 2008 01:39
Appearing at Montery Pop Festival June '67, where he was introduced to US audiences by Rolling Stone Brian Jones certainly didn't hurt...
Re: Mick peaking on the U.S dance charts (now #29)
Posted by:
terry
()
Date: February 2, 2008 01:42
come on mick
Re: Mick peaking on the U.S dance charts (now #29)
Posted by:
LA FORUM
()
Date: February 2, 2008 13:04
Quote
little queenie
maybe this is OT, but i heard today that the only reason jimi hendrix got so popular was that he was planted at the top of the charts. people wanted to have the hits of the day so bought his stuff not knowing anything about him. anyone else heard of this?
Yeah i think the record company bought copies (Hendrix), and I dont think people buy Jagger's albums anymore.
Re: Mick peaking on the U.S dance charts (now #29)
Posted by:
Erik_Snow
()
Date: February 2, 2008 15:23
Quote
little queenie
maybe this is OT, but i heard today that the only reason jimi hendrix got so popular was that he was planted at the top of the charts. people wanted to have the hits of the day so bought his stuff not knowing anything about him. anyone else heard of this?
There's a saying... "the sale will never take off, before the sale has taken off"... nevertheless - saying that it's the "only reason" Jimi Hendrix got so popular is...rubbish. He came up with a completely new and seductive sound. Are You Experienced is a milestone.
Re: Mick peaking on the U.S dance charts (now #29)
Posted by:
john r
()
Date: February 2, 2008 19:49
It's important to remember that Reprise had signed few rock n roll acts as of spring '67 - The Kinks' sales had fallen quite drastically, Harpers Bizarre is one group I know of, maybe they'd signed Kenny Rogers & the 1st Edition (many more would be signed in the next 2 years) - and its 'mother' label Warner bros itself had little 'underground' cachet, its biggest acts (Trini Lopez, Don Ho, Tom Lehrer) suggest it would be a few years before it morphed into a hip indie ('69) then finally a major before folding into WEA. So "buying" a # 5 peak and 106 week chart run in "Billboard" ("Are You Experienced?") is simply ludicrous.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Online Users
5strings , Dan , ghs73 , Handova , hobshobs1 , hockenheim95 , JessForte , JimmyTheSaint , joguema , kkhoranstoned , letitloose6 , mike567 , MisterDDDD , Nellcote1971 , petewasbristol , randallsdad , rogerriffin , RollingFreak , snarf2014 , spunky , stonemexico , ttutone , TumblinDice76 , wolundamo
Guests:
1240
Record Number of Users:
206
on June 1, 2022 23:50
Record Number of Guests:
9627
on January 2, 2024 23:10