Beelyboy Wrote:
>
> here's a link that busts much of your theories,
> but you'll question the source as a bastion of
> political agenda i assume; anyway let's start with
> this nytimes piece about clear channel.
>
> [
query.nytimes.com]
> 2E1DD1230F936A15750C0A9659C8B63
>
> so basically, i'm saying there IS a provable
> agenda on the part of the Clear Channel management
> that of course means owning and manipulating
> politicians,
Oy gevault... CC has been attempting to develop left-leaning programs and networks here in the States, primarily to see if they are a profitable market-niche because the $$$ and shareholders is what CC is all about. Thus far said programming and networks have met with marginal success primarily because said left-leaning message is already conveyed by the so-called mainstream media here.
BTW, there's ALWAYS been a relationship between media and politicians going back before William Randolph Hearst. Look how heroically the very NY Times you quote treats left-leaning politicians and ONLY left-leaning politicians.
Your chopper ride awaits.