The GR Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I'm in, I love Bill Wymans Rhythm Kings....who's > headlining?
Wyman is actually second on the bill, ahead of Pete Townshend. The least Stone is greater than the greatest Who? Not sure about that. Would Ringo get top billing over Mick?
Mongoose Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > I entered the lottery with the same mind set as > you would have buying a lottery ticket...."Yeah, I > might WIN......yeah......right....." > > Like I could just withdraw about six or seven > thousand dollars from the bank, fly to London from > Atlanta, hotel, meals, etc., at the drop of a > hat? > > Easy, right?
Same here. I did it thinking "Well, at least I won't have to wonder 'What if?'", but if I "won" it would be like "Okay, NOW what?" Maybe the reason so many people are signing up is they think the tickets are FREE. Maybe they don't realize that if you "win" it's going to cost you big time.
melillo Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > thats why they should at least put this show on a > ppv system so people could see them that way, but > that is to good an idea i guess so why do it
It's funny you mention that because in another thread I was talking about how if the Beatles had done a reunion concert in the 1970s, the way that 99.995% of Beatles fans would have seen it would have been to go to a movie theatre and watch it on a big closed circuit TV screen. Maybe they will do something like that with THIS fiasco.
tatters Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > melillo Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > thats why they should at least put this show on > a > > ppv system so people could see them that way, > but > > that is to good an idea i guess so why do it > > > It's funny you mention that because in another > thread I was talking about how if the Beatles had > done a reunion concert in the 1970s, the way that > 99.995% of Beatles fans would have seen it would > have been to go to a movie theatre and watch it on > a big closed circuit TV screen. Maybe they will do > something like that with THIS fiasco.
Maybe they wont. Its nerve wracking enough to play your first full length show together in 27 years without having to make it a live PPV broadcast as well.
SonicDreamer Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Moi. > > Gazzz, you are just in denial, come out of the Zep > closet! ;-) > > SD
Oh, I'd like to go - sure (and in the end, if I got tickets I most probably would)
However, theres a few other acts who are playing in London later this year who I'd rather make the trip to see but for financial reasons dont plan to.
Gazza Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > tatters Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > melillo Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > thats why they should at least put this show > on > > a > > > ppv system so people could see them that way, > > but > > > that is to good an idea i guess so why do it > > > > > > It's funny you mention that because in another > > thread I was talking about how if the Beatles > had > > done a reunion concert in the 1970s, the way > that > > 99.995% of Beatles fans would have seen it > would > > have been to go to a movie theatre and watch it > on > > a big closed circuit TV screen. Maybe they will > do > > something like that with THIS fiasco. > > > Maybe they wont. Its nerve wracking enough to play > your first full length show together in 27 years > without having to make it a live PPV broadcast as > well.
Why would that make it any more or any less nerve wracking? If you're on stage, you're on stage. It shouldn't matter whether there's two people watching or 200 million.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2007-09-16 16:57 by tatters.
tatters Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The GR Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- Would Ringo > get top billing over Mick?
Edith Grove Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Pardon if this has been discussed already, but is > anything being done about multiple entries or is > that allowed?
On the registration site it says that multiple entires are not allowed and if made will be cancelled.
Adrian-L Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Harm Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Me too, and I have a good feeling about it > > > please could you share your lotto numbers with us?
Manofwealthandtaste Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Edith Grove Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Pardon if this has been discussed already, but > is > > anything being done about multiple entries or > is > > that allowed? > > > On the registration site it says that multiple > entires are not allowed and if made will be > cancelled.
Id hate to be the poor bastard who has to plough through millions of entries looking for the same address coming up twice.
me too, now watch me win this with just one entry, but when the stones played the beacon i did everything to get in but failed, wouldnt surprise me a bit
I'm in cos I've fallen in love with a chick who has moved to Canterbury to study. And she's a fan of Paolo Nutiti or whatever his name, and he's supposed to be the opener. Well, I wanna be there for her (the girl I fancy) and for Bill and Pete. Led Zep's just a bonus. Not that I hold my breath, if we don't get the tickets,it will be an excellent excuse to try to get a cheap hotel room in London......