tatters Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ohnonotyouagain Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > tatters Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > A complete history of the Who's farewell
> tours:
> > >
> > > 1982 - The Farewell tour
> > > 1989-90 The we thought we'd just come back to
> > say
> > > goodbye again while Pete plays acoustic
> guitar
> > in
> > > a soundproof booth tour
> >
> > Acoustic guitar yes, soundproof booth, no
> >
> > > 1996-97 The we just figured out you need 18
> > people
> > > on stage to perform Quadrophenia properly
> tour
> >
> > > 1999-2000 The Pete CAN still play electric
> > after
> > > all, just not very loud tour
> >
> > On the contrary, he played very loud and very
> well
> > on that tour
> >
> > > 2002 - The John can't make the mortgage
> > payments
> > > on his castle, and even though he just
> dropped
> > > dead, we found someone else to stand over
> there
> > > and play the bass tour
> >
> > Of course I would rather that Entwistle lived
> to
> > go on that tour, but I would rather see Pete
> and
> > Roger as The Who than no Who at all
> >
> > > 2004 - The no particular reason tour
> >
> > see above
> >
> > > 2006-07 The get a load of our horrible new
> > album
> > > tour
> >
> > Parts of it are actually quite good, in my
> > opinion. It got pretty good reviews as well.
>
> Yes, I know, I exaggerated about the soundproof
> booth, but he WAS partially surrounded by some
> sort of soundproof baffling on the "quiet side" of
> the stage.
Really? I always thought that was a myth. I have a VHS of an '89 show that I've watched many times and I don't remember seeing any sort of baffling. Maybe I missed it, or they just edited it out of the video? Or maybe he had it for some shows and not others? I have a friend who saw them about 10 times in '89, I'll have to ask him.
> As far as you saying he played "very loud" in
> 2000, I can only ask "compared to what"? Did you
> see the Who in the 70s? I did. It was so loud I
> could hardly stand it. In 2000 he didn't even make
> my ears ring.
Ok, you've got me there. But nobody is as loud as The Who in the '70s, they were in the Guiness book of world records for loudest show ever for a concert from '76. Compared to that, ANY band is going to be quieter. I saw them in 2000 and my ears rang plenty. Which could be because my ears are just big pussies, I don't know
> A perverse aspect of the 2002 tour is that ticket
> sales actually increased after John died. I guess
> fans were getting bored with the three man Who and
> were curious to see what a two man Who would be
> like. I was. But I already had my tickets when
> John died. I went because I wanted my Who show. It
> was good, but I don't think I would have bought
> the tickets if I'd known John wasn't gonna be
> there.
Good points, I agree. They still put on a great show, tho of course not as good as with Entwistle. I loved Pete's deadpan, tongue-in-cheek comment in one of the shows: "Roger and I have talked it over and we've decided if one more of us dies we're not going to call it The Who anymore."
> As for Endless Wire, I was expecting a bad album,
> but not this bad. The best track on it is not as
> good as the worst track on what used to be their
> worst album, It's Hard.
To each his own, I suppose. I thought Mike Post Theme, It's Not Enough and the extended version of We've Got A Hit were very good, miles better than anything on It's Hard and most of Face Dances. And there are several others on there I like, just not as well as those three. I admit it's a very uneven album and there are some clunkers on it. Like most recordings by '60s bands in the CD era, it's overly long and could have greatly benefited from some serious editing/track order rearranging.
"It wasn't my fault ... liquors drunkened me!" Homer Simpson