Can you tell me what other rookie got a McLaren (or Ferrari) in his first year??? Schumacher, Alonso..... the first years was in bad teams.... Not Hamilton!! Why??? Cause Ron is his dad.....

well he might be his dad but not his genitor

gen·i·tor (jn-tr)
n.
1. One who produces or creates.
2. Anthropology A natural father or mother.

Wouldn't you say thats exaclty what he is???

talkin about ron dennis ablett
jesus

Aint there some F1 anoraks board where this can be discussed along with astronomy, the virtues of dunking rich tea biscuits and how to grow the perfect lawn?

this is an OT
you do not have to post in this thread ablett
goodbye for good now

glimmer twin 81 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ablett don't fart in my threads


LOL..what a quote

Michael Schumacher turned Ferrari into a family and success returned.

"glimmer twin 81 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ablett don't fart in my threads"

Shucks, I missed that one! I like Glimmer......

Well... but what family!!! The godfather Schumacher in the top... and all the rest working for him!!! Not sure if this is my idea of family, but at least... they was winners again!!!

Wouldn't it be nice, kaskatanas, if the rest is working for you... Well, Felipe Massa profited from that, too, while Raikkonen is proof to my McLaren theory. There, he found no family and probably yet doesn't want one and therefore stands on the outside of the Ferrari family. (But you might insist that especially Toro Rosso seems to be too much of a family and now they have a row as daddy Gerhard Berger recognized that they are on work and not at home.)

kimi raikkonen is pretty much overrated, he did not win any championship before his f1 career, it seemed he was havin bad luck with mcLaren but now we see he is havin bad luck with ferrari again. i guess thats no bad luck but a lot of drinkin with an overpaid contract in his mind

But if Raikkonen is overrated who is better than him besides Hamilton, Alonso and Massa? If you consider Heidfeld, I think the BMW is faster than him - maybe, also proven by the fact that Kubica had made much less impact than Raikkonen before joining Formula I. Probably the most underrated driver is Trulli. But I guess, now, he is too old to become world champion - but probably none of the first four can score regularly in that Toyota...

I guess most drivers are pretty bad. there has been michael schumacher, the greatest of all times, he has been way better than senna, but he did not die thats why he did not become such a legend yet.
trulli is good but I guess he his more interested in his vineyard than f1
lewis hamilton proved that f1 driving cant be too difficult

glimmer twin 81 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> lewis hamilton proved that f1 driving cant be too
> difficult


you bloody do it then. They are the top sportsmen in their field, don't be so ridiculous.

well if you win the championship 7 times like schumacher you have to be great for sure but I guess when you are a good driver you can make a few wins in f1 without havin an outstanding talent...
gimme a mcLaren I will make a few wins

glimmer twin 81 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> well if you win the championship 7 times like
> schumacher you have to be great for sure but I
> guess when you are a good driver you can make a
> few wins in f1 without havin an outstanding
> talent...
> gimme a mcLaren I will make a few wins


Don't be stupid. I doubt you're even old enough to have a licence for a start. Why say something so silly?

there is no age limit you idiot

glimmer twin 81 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> there is no age limit you idiot


For a driving licence, rectum

you need a super licence

pussy lover

pussy lover? is that a bad thing?

is a rectum a bad thing?

Oh, this board of eloquence...