In liberal democracy - ok, fair enough, this ain't exactly a liberal democracy - in benevolent BV administered dictatorship, people are allowed to say what they think. Thus, if Keith wasn't up to par at a show you went to, you are allowed to voice (or, er, type) that opinion. That's called freedom of speech. Unfortunately, the StonesTaliban around here wants that to cease.

I suggest you all spend this week reviewing the Federalist Papers.

*and i'm just like that bird - singing just for you*

I'd like to support, but I'm afraid the mob will come after me, so I'll just silently watch

Why don't you explian it to us, dong.

You attacked ME, dong. You called me an A-hole(thanks). Do I not have freedom of speech,dong? Maybe you should brush up on the federalist Papers yourself, dong. I have as much right to express my opinion as anyone, do I not,dong?

Its nowt to do with freedom of speach.
Its about spreading speculation, lies and estimations and ultimately repeateding the same statments till everyone here is bored to the point of distraction......

What is your problem ding dong?

Best regards from taliban IORR...

PS. I just love being a dictator. And most people need rules anyway...

Bjornulf

Bv's site, BV's rules, live with it or leave, its called freedom of choice

Is that a BV gag????

Top man.... rock on!

bv Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What is your problem ding dong?
>
> Best regards from taliban IORR...
>
> PS. I just love being a dictator. And most people
> need rules anyway...


Good one, BV.I was just doing what he said I was keeping others from doing: Expressing an opinion. Lighten up, ding dong.

ablett Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Its nowt to do with freedom of speach.
> Its about spreading speculation, lies and
> estimations and ultimately repeateding the same
> statments till everyone here is bored to the point
> of distraction......


so let's sum up ablett's argument: it has nothing to do with freedom of speech, he just wants us to have no freedom of speech!

*and i'm just like that bird - singing just for you*

Ket Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Bv's site, BV's rules, live with it or leave, its
> called freedom of choice


er, you may notice that i didnt attack bv . . .

i was talking about the more mobbish elements on the site. you know, the types that sentenced socrates to death.

*and i'm just like that bird - singing just for you*

No Pal, I would like to see the stupid speculation of the demise of either KR or the Stones to stop, the continuous negative reaction to absolutely EVERYTHING stop and for a few to grow up......

Freedom of Speach by all means but lets make it interesting....

ablett Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> No Pal, I would like to see the stupid speculation
> of the demise of either KR or the Stones to stop,
> the continuous negative reaction to absolutely
> EVERYTHING stop and for a few to grow up......
>
> Freedom of Speech by all means but lets make it
> interesting....


Quite agree.
Freedom of speech is a right which should be protected..
...but maybe freedom to repeat yourself ad nauseam should be restricted ;^)

But I get the feeling some here are after more than expressing an opinion. More to do with seeking attention.....

LOL, ablett. the reason anybody posts on a message board is for "attention." conversations are based on people paying "attention" to one another. um, otherwise they wouldnt join a forum . . .your logic demonstrates itself to be topnotch, once again.

*and i'm just like that bird - singing just for you*



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2007-06-18 18:07 by the singer not the bong.

But Billyboybongbong you seems to repeatedly try and gain a reaction with almost every post. Wouldn't that suggest you lacking something?

Did you not read what BV said "What is your problem ding dong?" and he hardly ever posts here during the day?

ablett Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> But Billyboybongbong you seems to repeatedly try
> and gain a reaction with almost every post.
> Wouldn't that suggest you lacking something?
>

a pistol, right about now . . .

*and i'm just like that bird - singing just for you*

Don't take it quite that bad Bongey. Self harms never a good option.....

Freedom of speech means you are free to say what you want, not that what you say should go unchallenged.

ablett Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Don't take it quite that bad Bongey. Self harms
> never a good option.....

not what i was thinkin . . .


*and i'm just like that bird - singing just for you*

Raoul Duke Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Freedom of speech means you are free to say what
> you want, not that what you say should go
> unchallenged.

absolutely, hunter. my post is more aimed at those who actually want to SILENCE those that don't toe the party line.

*and i'm just like that bird - singing just for you*

No ones trying to silence anyone, just reduce the repitition......

-



Edited 4 time(s). Last edit at 2007-06-18 18:41 by Erik_Snow.

are you people mentally challenged?

shut the fcuka and listen to the music loud !

....I loved bjornulf's reply....that was classic....

bv Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What is your problem ding dong?
>

Ouch!

(could "the singer not the bong" be right? )

Damn, from my experience it not like BV to name call, no matter what the provocation!



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2007-06-19 06:01 by ChrisM.

obviously not "no matter what the provocation."

however, to say or to deny it doesn´t make keith look or play better.

ablett you come here yourself again and again without having anything to say but trying to put other peoples opinions down.
you don´t have nothing to say , you are just "i need to defend the stones" programmed.

Dear pot ablett

- have you not noticed that you have the tendency to repeat yourself ad nauseam?


As for dictators, whether taliban types or Stones' forum types; sometimes they need a slap on the wrist.

I've said it before but I can say it again.

With the freedom of speech comes also the obligation of knowing when to shut up!

If you walk by a very, very fat woman - a stranger - in the street, would you then consider it your "right" to walk up to her and tell her that she is very overweight and for her own good she should lose some weight? (for equality reasons I should point out that it could just as well be a very fat man ;-))

..or would that not be a good time to shut up? Right or not.