>> MT has not received much in the form of royalties from the Stones and that is what his issue is
( MT is quoted as saying "I played on some of the biggest selling records and I do not get paid...) <<
i asked this already, but: how does this work? you're talking about royalties that the recording artist
gets from the sale of records, right? (anyway WIPMM says songwriting credits/royalties are not the issue).
i take it you're not saying the royalties Mick T duly receives from the Stones-owned catalogue
simply don't amount to very much, but rather that he is not receiving all the royalties he's legally owed.
so how does that happen, exactly? is he saying that the record companies and/or publishing company
haven't been reporting the real sales figures for these albums? that would have implications
beyond the question of one musician's royalties, of course, so ... [scratching head] ...
and stoned_in_dc, i posted this link before but you might really get something out of it: [
www.howstuffworks.com]
WIPMM has noted that this explanation applies to the US system, which is of course not universal,
but it gives some kind of picture of the way various types of royalties work.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2007-02-01 17:26 by with sssoul.