Re: Undercover
Date: September 2, 2006 07:42
john r Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> coffeepotman, agree the long remix of Too Much
> Blood is dated (Arthur Baker Mix, afterall) in a
> way the earlier 12-inch was like longer, hotter
> versions of the album track & deep dub
> version..."Think Im Going Mad" made a great '84
> b-side to 'She Was Hot' too...The whole
> reggae/dub/electro/Afrobeat vibe plus the dark
> content made it a less commercial lp than
> Thriller, the Police, Lionel Riche, etc...And as
> their last for Atlantic, maybe the label took too
> much (saleswise) for granted.
i think you bring up a good point here, despite what many people say about the stones going for an 80s commercial sound, I think you're right, UC is not a very commercial record, and they should be commended for not making another SG-ER-TTY redux and taking the chances they did on UC, which in retrospect makes UC, if not better in the sense of listenability, a more compelling record than it's highly vaunted predecessor TTY. it along with the discovery of EXile made me a Stones fan as a teen, not TTY, which I thought was mediocre when it came out. the Stones should've released UC in '84, it might've been better received that year amidst all the Orwell 1984 hype, topical (Springsteen) and funky (Prince) kinda vibe of that year. who know's though hindsight is 20/20