CindyC Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > That "band" is not GnR. They should change it to > "Plastic surgery'n'cornrows"
Oh my, how snippy !! As far as the Brain is concerned, WHO CARES ABOUT AXL ROSE, IT'S OVER !! Listen to the old albums and rock out...there is no Guns and Roses and Axl takes about 100 years to do ANYTHING so....bye, bye.......TIMES UP.....
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2006-06-02 23:34 by MicksBrain.
So what you're saying is that the whole big hair thing is to draw attention away from his shortcomings in the genital department? That sounds plausible to me.
This is a very amusing thread. I'm laughing pretty hard right. I like Axl Rose even though Velvet Revolver is where the Guns went. Don't discount Axl. He's likely to surprise ya'll. I like porno tight jeans on rockstars! Nothin' wrong with that. [insert wolf call right here]
> Don't discount Axl. He's likely to surprise ya'll. >
I predict he will become either the next Michael Bolton or the next Michael Jackson. He is a joke. His career will wither away after all the laughs have died down. I loved G'N'R in '88, but since then it's become a time capsule of that period and a distant memory. Axl is an idiot to carry on the bands name enlisting guitar players with names like Buckethead and Bumblefoot. It is an insult to any true rock and roll fan. But I have to admit, even though Slash was the heart of G'N'R, I never really liked his nickname. It sounds too much like The Edge or Bono or Sting. It's hard to take any of them seriously.
satisfaction2 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > There is "NOW" NO NEED to GIVE/SPEND money for > GUNS !! > Because Mick + management cancelled/postponed bad > selling shows in germany. > > Grüsse > Gerhard
Yeah, Prost to that. Why did they cancel Nurnberg? Ticket sales? Would the Stones do that? Scheisse, I say (excuse my spelling)