lol

Aucoin Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I don't think that Keith and Ronnie are relevant
> guitar players in any way anymore. The playing of
> both is most of the time lousy. Ronnie doesn't
> play very much these days and if he often just
> play wrong. As of Keith - I can't hear any
> "special" or "great" in his playing. He just plays
> as good or bad as thousands of other guitar
> players too. Often his playing is not very good
> these days, maybe because of his athritis, I
> dunno. His best times are as over as Elvis is
> dead. He is just there and is doing the Keef
> character everybody expects but that's it. He's
> not a great guitar player anymore. Fact!
>
> Let's face it as sad as it is - Chuck Leavell is
> the musical director of the Rolling Stones along
> with Mick Jagger.´


Please Tell Me: What's the essential point of stating this over over and over and over again... ?

And what is there really to debate here:
We all know Ron had a lousy start at the ABB Tour; and a lousy maybe first six weeks of the American leg... Too bad for all people who go top several shows,
esp. those of us who had the incredibly bad luck of doing it
Then finally got his thang together & started play like a rock star.
Who doesnt agree?

Sway didnt work for Ron at first; but I think all of us - or at least a undiscussable majority will agree that he has managted to row Sway ashore
in his own way.

Ron Wood & Keith Richards will always be relevant as guitarists in the Rolling Stones; and - so help me God - all that dwell other opinions can just bugger off. There is always a park, a bench; and doves to feed...

Like I've said many times, if you aint happy with the Stones then what you doing here?
Griping continuously aint constructive or worthwhile, its just moaning for the sake of moaning.
I've heard many recent boots and I think the Stones are rocking as do 99.9% of reviews on this site and by the press!
What makes the wingers here so different???

ablett Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Like I've said many times, if you aint happy with
> the Stones then what you doing here?

Many of us are attempting to restore some kind of objectivity, in the face of myopic childish subserviance.

I know it must be very difficult to have someone disagree with you, but that's life. Get used to it. Get over it.

~ XX:s playing is "pathetic" nowadays = objectivity. Halleluyah!

Baboon Bro Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Aucoin Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I don't think that Keith and Ronnie are
> relevant
> > guitar players in any way anymore. The playing
> of
> > both is most of the time lousy. Ronnie doesn't
> > play very much these days and if he often just
> > play wrong. As of Keith - I can't hear any
> > "special" or "great" in his playing. He just
> plays
> > as good or bad as thousands of other guitar
> > players too. Often his playing is not very good
> > these days, maybe because of his athritis, I
> > dunno. His best times are as over as Elvis is
> > dead. He is just there and is doing the Keef
> > character everybody expects but that's it. He's
> > not a great guitar player anymore. Fact!
> >
> > Let's face it as sad as it is - Chuck Leavell
> is
> > the musical director of the Rolling Stones
> along
> > with Mick Jagger.´
>
>
> Please Tell Me: What's the essential point of
> stating this over over and over and over again...
> ?
>


Freedom of speech. Accept it, you have no choice, bro.

ablett Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Like I've said many times, if you aint happy with
> the Stones then what you doing here?
>

and that about constitutes your entire set of contributions, too....

Aucoin, no one wquestioned Freddom of Speech.
In fact I think that is held way up higher in the old World.

Still I wonder: why bring the f***-ups up non-stop?
Didnt Keith mess quite some times in the 70s?

Baboon Bro Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Aucoin, no one wquestioned Freddom of Speech.
> In fact I think that is held way up higher in the
> old World.
>
> Still I wonder: why bring the f***-ups up
> non-stop?
> Didnt Keith mess quite some times in the 70s?

It's a topic that moves me constantly. Being such a bad guitar player and making that much money with it. Fascinating. Both Keith 'n Ronnie can't really play but they travel the world, making loads of money got all the benefits of being class 1 celebreties and doing almost nothing for it. I mean really...This IS a topic, isn't it?

I HAVE to talk about it.

;-)

I'd give therapy ago if its THAT bad!!!

Aint Rock N Roll meant to be 'sloppy" anyway, its all about the moment, the feel???

You wanna hear 'technically' gifted musician then I'm sure there's a few YES sites begging for more analyss of every note???

And if my entire contribution is to enjoy, suppport and admire the stones then thats fine in my book rather than grizzle about ever tiny subject!

Keep on typing, mate.
Keith & mick picked Ron. Fine with me.
I can miss Taylor.
maybe it would be intersting with Clapton, Page & Blackmore
in the Stones... But their concept have never been
about being a clever b*stard.
...Why do I get déja vù-feelings now?

Up hill climb ma boy but were getting there!!!

ablett Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Up hill climb ma boy but were getting there!!!


Looks like more of a circular movement from here. A very small one at that.

Two top posts on this board at the mo....

Sick of Mick and Slouching towards Vegas

Does that sound like a fan site to you????

I'm sort of enjoying Viva las vegas performed by ZZ Top from 1992.
It was originally recorded in 1964 as a B-side to the single What'd I Say by Elvis Presley.
Viva Las Vegas was penned by Doc Pomus and Mort Shuman
It's soooo goddamned goooood. I loovezzz it real mucho. MEZ

and Ay ay baby it hurts

ablett Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Two top posts on this board at the mo....
>
> Sick of Mick and Slouching towards Vegas
>
> Does that sound like a fan site to you????


It's a "Rolling Stones" fan site, not a "Rolling Stones 2006" fan site, Ablett. But I could do with less negative posts...