Tell Me :  Talk
Talk about your favorite band. 

Previous page Next page First page IORR home

For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.

Goto Page: Previous12
Current Page: 2 of 2
Re: BIGGER BANG IS NOT NOMINATED FOR BEST ALBUM OF THE YEAR
Posted by: lodge ()
Date: December 12, 2005 00:07

Is this guy the same who tries to sell me tickets not via ebay and think I really believe hime like I did the last time.
Can't you just get off of this cloud...

Re: BIGGER BANG IS NOT NOMINATED FOR BEST ALBUM OF THE YEAR
Posted by: SKlPPY ()
Date: December 12, 2005 02:49

Something related to the topic - The Grammys are for main stream, cookie cutter music for the masses. Why the hell would anyone want those clowns to even know who the Stones are much less nominate then for something.

Re: BIGGER BANG IS NOT NOMINATED FOR BEST ALBUM OF THE YEAR
Posted by: ferrante9 ()
Date: December 12, 2005 07:11

well.....whether we like the grammis or not...we have to admit that winning album of the year will only translate into more exposure.


if macca will win, he ll sell more albums....and more power to him.

the stones seem to be doing so so considering the money spent in their marketing.

Re: BIGGER BANG IS NOT NOMINATED FOR BEST ALBUM OF THE YEAR
Posted by: bassaleman ()
Date: December 12, 2005 08:57

I bet you that Keith couldn't give crap if they win or not...

Re: BIGGER BANG IS NOT NOMINATED FOR BEST ALBUM OF THE YEAR
Date: December 12, 2005 12:45

The Stones are reliable and sustainable product, like Bayer Aspirin. They may not be the Street Fighting Men of '68 - '69, but their catalogue is enormous. And they can laugh all the way to their multi-million dollar homes about ABB not being nominated. They don't care, they're raking in the dosh. They're doing what they want to do and people are paying good money to see them.

How many people can say they really like what they do for work?

"The wonder of Jimi Hendrix was that he could stand up at all he was so pumped full of drugs." Patsy, Patsy Stone

Re: BIGGER BANG IS NOT NOMINATED FOR BEST ALBUM OF THE YEAR
Posted by: Leonard Keringer ()
Date: December 12, 2005 19:12

ferrante9 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> well.....whether we like the grammis or not...we
> have to admit that winning album of the year will
> only translate into more exposure.
>
>



exposure?.....yeah the Stones need exposure...nobody knows who they are.....Ferrante your ill-logic is amazing.......you and yur ideas are a joke

Re: BIGGER BANG IS NOT NOMINATED FOR BEST ALBUM OF THE YEAR
Posted by: ferrante9 ()
Date: December 13, 2005 11:17

well....

only 390 000 copies sold in the US.....that's not too impressive.

considering this huge tour, and ameriquest ads, and superbowl.......


Maccs, if he had the same marketing team as the stones, he'd be selling millions of copies ala madonna.......

Re: BIGGER BANG IS NOT NOMINATED FOR BEST ALBUM OF THE YEAR
Posted by: Erik_Snow ()
Date: December 13, 2005 12:36

What do you want, ferrante?
What are you trying to gain?
You are a fantastic poster, I must say.
Merry christmas!

Goto Page: Previous12
Current Page: 2 of 2


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Online Users

Guests: 2116
Record Number of Users: 206 on June 1, 2022 23:50
Record Number of Guests: 9627 on January 2, 2024 23:10

Previous page Next page First page IORR home