Re: Rarities or specialties
Date: December 4, 2005 11:05
F.U.C The Captain you've got a point here and I agree.Studio recordings tend to be artificial more and more and are really hard to be reproduced live using 2 guitars,bass,drums.Same thing on a lesser extend goes for all studio recordings, present or past. On the other hand, there are lots of people who go to concerts and expect to hear the exact studio version.I think that in the 1989-90 concerts the band tried to get closer to the studio arrangements (cowbell on Honky Tonk, horn on You can't always..,the pre-recorded congas on Sympathy etc).This would be another conversation maybe, but I think it is much harder to reproduce live "We love you", "She's a rainbow"(they tried in 97-98), "Moonlight mile"(same for that one),"Time waits for noone" for example than almost anything from more recent, technically advanced studio recordings, just by using the core five-members sound.Up to 1982 they used to play all the rockers, some of the slow to moderate songs too, using their fine,strong,charming,monolithic sound as the main axle.But from 1989 on, I think that they've tried to build a different kind of relationship between studio and live version-past and present. I think they did fine bringing lots of songs out to breathe.In my opinion they succeeded in knitting a thread,reconstructing the umbilical cord NOT in a nostalgic way whatsoever.Concerning myself, they recharged my initial zest for all those sounds and marvels.