what has he really done since the beatles broke up? very small success with wings, then a 15 year lull. I think chapman shot the wrong beatle!

WINGS WAS THE BEST SELLING ACT IN THE 70'S

WINGS OUTSOLD THE BEATLES AND THE STONES COMBINED IN THE 70S

WINGS BROKE THE RECORD ATTANDANCE IN SEATLLE IN 1976 ( 76 000 PEOPLE)


WINGS BROKE THE RECORD OF BEST SELLING SINGLE OF ALL TIME ( MULL OF KYNTIRE ) 4 MILLION + COPIES.


PAUL MCCARTNEY WAS NAMED THE MOST SUCCESSFULL COMPOSER OF ALL TIME IN 1978


PAUL MCCARTNEY HAS WON THE TITLE OF " TOUR OF THE YEAR" EVERY YEAR HE HAS TOURED ( 1976-1988-90- 2002-03-2004

NUFF SAID!!!!

Paul SUCKS. What a bore. SAPPY SAPPY SAPPY

all your "official" stats are 30 years old! and made up!

I M SORRY TO TELL YOU....BUT THEY ARE NOT MADE UP.

READ SOME ROCK AND ROLL LITERATURES...


BUFFOON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

J.J.Flash Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
I think chapman shot the wrong beatle!


Totally tasteless JJ.

It's very sad that you would write that.

"MULL OF KYNTIRE"

thank goddness Stones never wrote MULL OF KYNTIRE - the worst kind of shit ever made..

worst kind of shit....but it sold millions of copies........sold enough to become the best selling single ever at the time!!!

camper 88 wrote:

>Totally tasteless JJ.

It's very sad that you would write that




like i was serious!

Just stop it!

This is ridiculous!



_____________________________________________________

What's your favourite flavour?...........Cherry Red!!

What is amazing is that years later, I'm not sure anyone remembers "Mull of Kyntire" . The Stones would never record a song in 3/4 time with bagpipes, and thank god for that! Of course, they did record "Streets of Love", so . .. . .

Mull is just shite. It was considered shite at its release as well.

For christ sake.... it aint 1964 you know. This stuff is sooooooo boring to read! No Macca aint over rated and really, who gives a flying fig? Grow up!!!

If we could just get the Vibrato Squad to fight the Macca Brigade, all would be well.

<<<camper 88 wrote:

>Totally tasteless JJ.

It's very sad that you would write that




like i was serious! <<<<<



sad but so true, would love to hear some tunes from John nowadays!

Mr Edward..... don't get that lot started otherwise we will be here for ever.

Amazes me that we have one of the finest Stones years and people rattle on about comparisons with Macca????

This subject is so tedious and utterly stupid, so in order to make it a helluva lot more interesting I'll post a few pics of Meg White. Here we go. Enjoy!!!

I agree

And here's one for Reptile:

country honk Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> "MULL OF KYNTIRE"
>
> thank goddness Stones never wrote MULL OF KYNTIRE
> - the worst kind of shit ever made..

One of the first songs I learned on the guitar

Oh come, on:

NOTE ANOTHER THREAD ABOUT THIS TOPIC

How insecure must one be to start this again and again.

ferrante9, you are definetly on the wrong board. And pls stop writing in capital letters. It will not give your postings more significance.

I respect the Beatles work, but for me Paul alone is a fabric softener. Calling his tours "tour of the year..." (I still don't know if this is true and on which sources you rely) is obviously nonsense. How can anyone overpraise his tours like that? I mean it's just one boring bass-player (and some supernumeraries) standing in front of his mic all the time and waving to the audience. Any other artist should be able to deliver this minimum of performance. As far as his songs are concerned, only the old Beatles tunes make the show and not his solo crap. I find it pretty unimaginative to call this show format "best".
This man is so incredibly boring on stage. I tried to watch some of his latter concerts, but had to skip as I realized this man is fixed with superglue in front of his mic. Also I think he looks so fragile. Mick and Keith in comparision have a magic appearance on stage.

Band on the Run, Jet, Junior's Farm, Live & Let Die, My Love, LTWTMS.......it goes on and on. Some would say the same of the Stones since 1972....I am not one of those.

The comment about Chapman deserves an apology.

not sure who this "mccarney" fellow is that you are all speaking of....as for Paul McCartney - he's all aces with me.

i got a kick out of his bust in japan he had like a half pound of skunk!!!! big head ....

"PAUL MCCARTNEY WAS NAMED THE MOST SUCCESSFULL COMPOSER OF ALL TIME IN 1978"

Then those woting for Macca hadn't heard fx. Some Girls....... Imagine Some Girls with Mull of Kintyre.......

Mamma Mia, Macca Mia......

No more Ferrante, aka 'Buffoon Bro'?

Wasn`t Mull of Kintyre an old folks song?

I always liked Stones much more than the Beatles and I would never pay too much attention to Paul. But looking at his touring set lists for his fans, man he is way ahead of Stones.

Paul is playing tonight in Glendale, Arizona. I have never seen him in concert but wouldn't mind at all if the ticket was cheap. Like most of the people on this board, I think a large majority of his work leaves a lot to be desired. He did do some great things like the lp "Band on the run" and I wouldn't mind hearing him play some songs from the "Rubber Soul" album. I probably won't go unless I can score a super cheapie ticket which seems unlikely. The Stones come here in a week and I would much rather see them ad nauseum than to pay the same amount and see the only Beatle who has the potential of being reincarnated as a Kotex tampon (with strings attached).

Charles Baudelaire
1821-1867