Tell Me :  Talk
Talk about your favorite band. 

Previous page Next page First page IORR home

For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.

Goto Page: Previous123456Next
Current Page: 5 of 6
Re: Paul vs Mick
Posted by: LA FORUM ()
Date: December 3, 2005 11:37

ferrante9 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> BULL!!!!!
>
> BUFFOON C?????
>
>
> LET'S PUT THINGS IN PERSPECTIVE:
>
>
> BETTER DANCER: BOTH CAN'T DANCE FOR SHIT, THEY
> ARE NO MICHAEL JACKSON, BUT MICK WILL GET THIS ONE
> BECAUSE HE IS FUNNY WHEN HE DANCES
>
> BETTER GUITARIST: MACCA SMOKES MICK
>
> BETTER BASSIT: MACCA IS THE BEST BASSIST OF ALL
> TIME
>
> BETTER DRUMMER: JUST LISTEN TO BACK IN THE USSR.
>
> BETTER PIANOMAN: MACCA
>
> BETTER SINGER OVERALL: MACCA
>
> BETTER SINGER FOR BALLADS: MACCA
>
> BETTER SINGER FOR ROCK AND ROLL: MACCA EX HELTERK
> SKELTER, LONG TALL SALLY ETCC
>
> BETTER SINGERFOR HEAVY METAL": HELTER
> SKELTER...THERFORE MACCA
>
> BETTER STAMINA: MICK.....HE CAN JUMP AROUND THE
> STAGE FOR 2 HOURS. MACCA CANT
>
> BETTER SHAPYE: MICK....PRETTY BUFF.
>
>
> FINAL SCORE: 9-3 FOR MACCA...MACCA IS THE
> WINNEER.
>



Says who?? I think and many think that Mick is (was) a better singer in many ways. Besides Lennon is the best singer ever. Noone gets emotions thru like him which is what a singer does.

Re: Paul vs Mick
Posted by: gia43 ()
Date: December 3, 2005 14:13


> ferrante9 Wrote:


> >
> > BETTER SINGER OVERALL: MACCA
> >
> > BETTER SINGER FOR BALLADS: MACCA
> >
> > BETTER SINGER FOR ROCK AND ROLL: MACCA EX
> HELTERK
> > SKELTER, LONG TALL SALLY ETCC
> >
> > BETTER SINGERFOR HEAVY METAL": HELTER
> > SKELTER...THERFORE MACCA

have you heard mick's voice?? he is one of the best (to me the best) singers ever...i don't want to start naming songs...!!



Re: Paul vs Mick
Posted by: J.J.Flash ()
Date: December 3, 2005 16:13

let's all stop responding to ferrante9. Maybe he'll go away. He's obviously a crazed stalker. Mccartney should be worried about this nutbag!

Re: Paul vs Mick
Posted by: ferrante9 ()
Date: December 4, 2005 03:07

i don't think mick is a great singer

he is a good singer.........


but he can't sing helter skelter for shit

Re: Paul vs Mick
Posted by: deuce ()
Date: December 4, 2005 05:17

Helter Skelter isnt even his song...who cares if he can sing it or not. Your argument is old, take your ball and go home.

Re: Paul vs Mick
Posted by: Midnight Toker ()
Date: December 4, 2005 07:57

Mick is in better shape and I am certain that he looks better in a thong.

Re: Paul vs Mick
Posted by: stonesfan70 ()
Date: December 4, 2005 08:15

There is a book out there (the title escapes me) that lists the worst rockers of all time. McCartney was chosen #1, right above Billy Joel #2 and Phil Collins #3.

Re: Paul vs Mick
Posted by: JumpingKentFlash ()
Date: December 4, 2005 13:30

deuce Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Helter Skelter isnt even his song.


It is Paul McCartney's song for sure.

I checked up on Ferrante by the way. He's a user that supposedly was kicked off the official Macca forum because he was too @#$%& up I guess. He's back on there because he uses a different name now. I believe he calls himself Zimmy now.
I know that some Macca fans aren't too happy with him either.

JumpingKentFlash

Re: Paul vs Mick
Posted by: ferrante9 ()
Date: December 6, 2005 09:08

all i am saying is that i was really disappointed with the stones when they came to anaheim.


i v seen macca 6 times now.....and he never once failed to deliver.

i v seen the stones twice......the first time was so great that i became more than just an occasional fan.

the second time around however, really disappointed me. the set list wasn't good. miss you was weak. NO beast of burden. Only 4 songs on the b stage. lame crowd.

the only thing that really got me going was the stage....the stage was totally cool.


Mick should stop pretending to be a guitarist, and start singing miss you right. Instead of doing cover songs, they should play beast of burden instead.

Re: Paul vs Mick
Posted by: Erik_Snow ()
Date: December 6, 2005 09:19

Sigh.
Oh me, oh my!

Re: Paul vs Mick
Posted by: Erik_Snow ()
Date: December 6, 2005 09:20

Hold your breath,
Im going to have a fart.

Re: Paul vs Mick
Posted by: Erik_Snow ()
Date: December 6, 2005 09:20

Wait....

Re: Paul vs Mick
Posted by: Erik_Snow ()
Date: December 6, 2005 09:21

Now Im OK.

Re: Paul vs Mick
Posted by: ferrante9 ()
Date: December 7, 2005 10:31

SEE...YOUC AN'T SAY ANYTHING BECAUSE I MRIGHT

Re: Paul vs Mick
Posted by: JumpingKentFlash ()
Date: December 7, 2005 12:28

ferrante9 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> SEE...YOUC AN'T SAY ANYTHING BECAUSE I MRIGHT


@#$%& off.

JumpingKentFlash

Re: Paul vs Mick
Posted by: Erik_Snow ()
Date: December 7, 2005 14:07

What is this? A fart?
Excuse me.

Re: Paul vs Mick
Posted by: Erik_Snow ()
Date: December 7, 2005 14:07

Im allright, its over.
Thanks.

Re: Paul vs Mick
Posted by: ferrante9 ()
Date: December 8, 2005 10:05

MICK IS A BETTER DANCER.

MACCA IS A BETTER MUSICIAN.


THEY ARE BOTH GREAT ENTERTAINER.


HOW S THAT?


WE CAN CONCLUDE WITH THESE 3 POINTS:

MICK, BETTER DANCER

MACCA, BETTER MUSICIAN

MICK AND MACCA ARE BOTH EQUALLY GREAT PERFORMERS.


THANK YOU.


LET IT BE!!!!

Re: Paul vs Mick
Posted by: drbryant ()
Date: December 8, 2005 10:15

How old is this guy? 12?

Re: Paul vs Mick
Posted by: Lizard ()
Date: August 2, 2006 20:32

I am for once, for nostalgic reasons, gonna kick this one up.

This is classic IORR stuff.

Ferrante is no doubt the most discussed and most legendary IORR member ever.

Fantastic!!

Re: Paul vs Mick
Posted by: Lukester ()
Date: August 2, 2006 20:34

let sleeping dogs lie

Re: Paul vs Mick
Posted by: Lizard ()
Date: August 2, 2006 20:38

Does he still visit?

Re: Paul vs Mick
Posted by: Lukester ()
Date: August 2, 2006 20:50

There has been speculation that he is among us.....still

Re: Paul vs Mick
Posted by: curtisdavis ()
Date: August 2, 2006 20:53

WOW,what a read,first of all I love the Beatles ,Wings, Harrison solo ,Lennon solo also,Paul puts on good concerts,I just think he plays to many Beatle songs,I like hearing them,I just think more Wings and early solo material would be more respectable..Paul of course is a better all round musican,but he can't touch Mick at rocking and performing.I don't compare what is the point?

Re: Paul vs Mick
Posted by: Lizard ()
Date: August 2, 2006 20:53

It ain't me, I'm tellin' ya!!

Re: Paul vs Mick
Posted by: open-g ()
Date: August 2, 2006 21:02

oh dear, did I do the kick off?

in hind sight he was a legendary poster - but I'm glad it's over

Re: Paul vs Mick
Posted by: Ged Rambler ()
Date: August 2, 2006 21:42

Ged Rambler Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Jagger is KING - NO ARGUMENT.


I agree 100% with the comment,but I did'nt post it,so how did it get here?

Re: Paul vs Mick
Posted by: 55 Rusty ()
Date: August 3, 2006 00:02

Stones against Beatles / Paul against Mick
this reminds me back in the 60's when I was 15 or 16.
That's silly

Re: Paul vs Mick
Posted by: glimmer twin 81 ()
Date: August 3, 2006 00:04

stupid topic
everyone knows that mick sings much better
than 20 years ago

just hear some live records of the 70
compared to now

Re: Paul vs Mick
Posted by: Lizard ()
Date: August 3, 2006 00:07

Come on, come on, it was just a laugh. I just wanted it back for fun. For the stupidity of it. No need to seriously comment it.

Goto Page: Previous123456Next
Current Page: 5 of 6


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Online Users

Guests: 1314
Record Number of Users: 206 on June 1, 2022 23:50
Record Number of Guests: 9627 on January 2, 2024 23:10

Previous page Next page First page IORR home