For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
barbabang
Great performance with Starf^&ker in 81. Listen to the piano with Stu, the fantastic bass here by Bill, the gritty sound from Keith, the great vocals by Mick AND Ronnie in the same mike. If you love the music from the Stones this live version is it.
Quote
barbabang
Great performance with Starf^&ker in 81. Listen to the piano with Stu, the fantastic bass here by Bill, the gritty sound from Keith, the great vocals by Mick AND Ronnie in the same mike. If you love the music from the Stones this live version is it.
Quote
DoxaQuote
barbabang
Great performance with Starf^&ker in 81. Listen to the piano with Stu, the fantastic bass here by Bill, the gritty sound from Keith, the great vocals by Mick AND Ronnie in the same mike. If you love the music from the Stones this live version is it.
I agree with all those indvidual points you make (especially in regard to Stu & Bill), but still something in the whole performance doesn't quite click to me. The whole is not more than the sum of its parts in this case. To me the version sounds a bit breathless and forced. Like a bad garage band (as usual when the magic doesn't happen). But I guess that's something to do with it being a one-timer, and their old diesel motor needed some warming up then. By contrast, the version in LIVE IN TEXAS 78 is pure gold, but they played it regularly.
Or it could be that I just don't love the music from the Stones.
- Doxa
Quote
exilestones
Looks like LA.
Quote
999Quote
exilestones
Looks like LA.
It's from Seattle (2nd night)
Quote
DoxaQuote
barbabang
Great performance with Starf^&ker in 81. Listen to the piano with Stu, the fantastic bass here by Bill, the gritty sound from Keith, the great vocals by Mick AND Ronnie in the same mike. If you love the music from the Stones this live version is it.
I agree with all those indvidual points you make (especially in regard to Stu & Bill), but still something in the whole performance doesn't quite click to me. The whole is not more than the sum of its parts in this case. To me the version sounds a bit breathless and forced. Like a bad garage band (as usual when the magic doesn't happen). But I guess that's something to do with it being a one-timer, and their old diesel motor needed some warming up then. By contrast, the version in LIVE IN TEXAS 78 is pure gold, but they played it regularly.
Or it could be that I just don't love the music from the Stones.
- Doxa
Quote
Stoneage
I will post Tops from 1972 again. Jagger's lyrics is still a bit raw but the guitars are something. Maybe the title is right?
The Stones were on Top in 1972? Please listen to it and judge for yourself...
[www.youtube.com]
Quote
DoxaQuote
barbabang
Great performance with Starf^&ker in 81. Listen to the piano with Stu, the fantastic bass here by Bill, the gritty sound from Keith, the great vocals by Mick AND Ronnie in the same mike. If you love the music from the Stones this live version is it.
I agree with all those indvidual points you make (especially in regard to Stu & Bill), but still something in the whole performance doesn't quite click to me. The whole is not more than the sum of its parts in this case. To me the version sounds a bit breathless and forced. Like a bad garage band (as usual when the magic doesn't happen). But I guess that's something to do with it being a one-timer, and their old diesel motor needed some warming up then. By contrast, the version in LIVE IN TEXAS 78 is pure gold, but they played it regularly.
Or it could be that I just don't love the music from the Stones.
- Doxa
Quote
Stoneage
I must add this 72' version of Tops. It's really good. And puts further proof on Professor HMS's theory about Tattoo You being a compilation...
[www.youtube.com]