Rockingfan Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I would love to see them making a concert just
> with the 16 new songs and then leave and give us
> an encore of 3-4 old songs. This would be super
> cool.
> Since a long time this is also the most dancable
> album where you can move and groove. Once again I
> said it already: It might not be the biggest and
> greatest album, but it's a compilation album which
> shows the Stones doing the best they can, playing
> rock and roll and blues
Yes. A great idea indeed (And marvellous post BTW. I agree 100%). But then people would be bitching about the set being too short. There's ALWAYS something wrong. If it ain't enough new songs, it's a setlist that's too short. If the setlist is long enough, it's Ronnie's playing. If it ain't Ron's playing, it's Keith's arthritis. If that ain't it either, it's Mick's yelling instead of singing. If he sings good, it's Darryll's bass-playing not being EXACTLY like Bill Wyman. If that ain't it either, it's the backing musicians' volume level. If they are turned down to a good low volume, it's that the Stones have become an international concern. Yak yak yak. Get a life, and then enjoy it with some Stones on your stereo.
JumpingKentFlash