Tell Me :  Talk
Talk about your favorite band. 

Previous page Next page First page IORR home

For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.

Opinions on the BBC Radio 2 Stones programmes
Posted by: paulywaul ()
Date: August 31, 2005 19:53

Did anyone hear the BBC Radio 2 programmes about the Stones recently, on last Saturday and Bank Holiday Monday ?

I was a bit disappointed really, I thought there was way too little "interview" and way too much playing of songs (mostly stuff NOT from the new album I hasten to add) in their entirety.

Re: Opinions on the BBC Radio 2 Stones programmes
Posted by: LolA ()
Date: September 1, 2005 03:03

Yep, thought exactly the same. Too many songs, not necessarily the best ones, plus "Old habits die hard" played in full, what a waste of time. And not enough interviews....

Re: Opinions on the BBC Radio 2 Stones programmes
Posted by: Edward Twining ()
Date: September 1, 2005 09:13

It could have been so much better - i was expecting the second programme to be devoted to the new album. Too many old songs were played and playing Old Habits Die Hard seemed unneccessary.
The interviews were interesting but were edited too much and the critical analysis seemed uninspiring.

Re: Opinions on the BBC Radio 2 Stones programmes
Posted by: the juf ()
Date: September 1, 2005 10:42

I was very moved by Charlie's account of his illness... being so very open about it....

Re: Opinions on the BBC Radio 2 Stones programmes
Posted by: nashville ()
Date: September 1, 2005 11:15

It wasnt bad but too much filler and not enough interview material. At least it was a mostly positive spin on the band.

Andy


Re: Opinions on the BBC Radio 2 Stones programmes
Posted by: Beast ()
Date: September 1, 2005 11:22

I agree with the general consensus - i.e., way too much playing of tracks at length when instead they could have aired more of the interviews with the boys, which were v. interesting.

Re: Opinions on the BBC Radio 2 Stones programmes
Posted by: riffhard72 ()
Date: September 1, 2005 11:44

All in all, I thought it was OK, but - yes. More interviews would have been much better.

Re: Opinions on the BBC Radio 2 Stones programmes
Posted by: The GR ()
Date: September 1, 2005 11:58

I only heard part 2 but I agree that playing old stuff when discussing the new album wasn't right but it was a good effort. At least they spoke to some of the fans to get their opinions on things.

Check out the latest Q which has a bad review but still gives the album 3 stars and one of the poorest band interviews EVER.

Re: Opinions on the BBC Radio 2 Stones programmes
Posted by: Gazza ()
Date: September 1, 2005 14:47

Typical Q, then. A once fine magazine that is now beyond recall.

They have basically refused to acknowledge the band's greatness for years (how many 'special issues' have they done on other acts down the years - I mean, Radiohead for Chrissakes - yet theyre the only UK music magazine who have never done one on the Stones)

No wonder I stopped buying it a couple of years ago. It had become nothing more than an excuse to fill 50 pages with meaningless polls every month...

Check out the review in UNCUT. Best review I've seen of a new Stones album in the UK press in living memory

Re: Opinions on the BBC Radio 2 Stones programmes
Posted by: kennydice58 ()
Date: September 1, 2005 17:48

Did anyone tape the 2 BBC radio 2 shows as i would love to have a copy of em
cheers
Kennydice

You Got Echo Man, Lets do it With Echo

Re: Opinions on the BBC Radio 2 Stones programmes
Posted by: Monkeytonkman ()
Date: September 1, 2005 17:56

Kennydice, don't know if this helps, but i think they are still playing it on the official BBC 2 website, I only caught the second show, so I went on the web site and listened to both parts one after the other, I quite enjoyed it. nice to hear some of the new stuff played on the radio.

Heres the link mate:

[www.bbc.co.uk]

'ope it elps

Re: Opinions on the BBC Radio 2 Stones programmes
Posted by: kennydice58 ()
Date: September 1, 2005 17:59

i know but did anybody tape the show for keepsake

Re: Opinions on the BBC Radio 2 Stones programmes
Date: September 1, 2005 18:25

I was expecting to hear some 'fan input' after that girl from the Beeb posted here wanting fans for a radio show.......did we scare her off I wonder?!

Re: Opinions on the BBC Radio 2 Stones programmes
Posted by: paulywaul ()
Date: September 1, 2005 20:58

Yes,

I taped it.

Re: Opinions on the BBC Radio 2 Stones programmes
Posted by: GuessWho ()
Date: September 1, 2005 22:49

As is usual with a lot of these progs they obviously don`t have enough interview material so they pad out the shows with lots of music.

A single one hour show would have been more succinct.


Re: Opinions on the BBC Radio 2 Stones programmes
Posted by: kennydice58 ()
Date: September 1, 2005 23:07

To paulywall would it be possible for a copy of the 2 broadcasts.

You got Echo Man, Let's Do It with echo

Re: Opinions on the BBC Radio 2 Stones programmes
Posted by: The GR ()
Date: September 2, 2005 13:56

They did interview fans but what do you mean by input, the programme was put together by a company not a fan group.

The questions were things like how did you get in to the band, favourite concert moment, are they good to fans and are they still relevant. But lets face it like any documentary you want comments from music jurnos and record company people rather than Joe Schmo from the trailer park.

Re: Opinions on the BBC Radio 2 Stones programmes
Posted by: paulywaul ()
Date: September 2, 2005 14:03

kennydice58,

I've e-mailed you. Yes, no problem, I have a twin cassette deck

Re: Opinions on the BBC Radio 2 Stones programmes
Posted by: kennydice58 ()
Date: September 2, 2005 15:36

Hi paul that wold be cool mailed you cheers
Kennydice

Re: Opinions on the BBC Radio 2 Stones programmes
Posted by: Claire_M ()
Date: September 2, 2005 22:57

Is this article (on the BBC News web site today) from the radio interview, or something different?
[BTW< I love it when Mick says of Keith, "He's not a happy person."!]

The Stones: still rocking, still controversial
By Robin Denselow
Correspondent, BBC Newsnight

In an exclusive interview at the start of their world tour, rock legends The Rolling Stones talk about life on the road at 60-plus years, US politics and why they didn't play Live 8.

"The idea of retiring is like killing yourself," announced Keith Richards. "It's almost like Hari Kari. I intend to live to 100 and go down in history."

The Rolling Stones guitarist was perched on a flight case in Boston behind the massive 500-ton stage on which the band will be performing for the next year, or more.

He may be 61 now, and look as battered as he has done for most of his career, but he seems delighted to be back at what he calls "the office", on tour with surely the most celebrated surviving veterans in the history of rock and roll.

The Rolling Stones may have been together for an extraordinary 43 years, but in many ways they are still pioneers, and this is a crucial time for them.

No other band has embarked on quite such a massive tour, with well over 100 concerts, when three of the band members are in their 60s.

New album

They will, of course, be playing favourite songs from the past four decades, from Brown Sugar and Satisfaction to Sympathy For The Devil, as well as songs from their new album, A Bigger Bang.

We're weird chemistry but somehow it works... the only time you hear about Mick and me is when we're having a spat
Keith Richards on his relationship with Mick Jagger

It is their first studio set of new songs in eight years and their longest for over three decades. It includes old-style, pared-down Stones' rock songs, as well as ballads, funk, and a reminder of the Stones' early days as a blues band.
"If you don't know the blues," said Richards, "there's no point in picking up the guitar and playing rock and roll or any other form of popular music."

There's even a rare political song, Sweet Neo-Con, which revives their reputation for controversy. It's an attack on the American Right, and includes such lyrics as "you call yourself a Christian... I think you are a hypocrite."

It was written by the now Sir Mick Jagger, who has had something of an establishment image since he was knighted nearly two years ago, but now said he felt obliged to tackle American politics.

"It was my feeling for these last two or three years that this kind of politics comes from a very small but very vociferous group of powerful people," said Jagger.

"I think you're always prepared to listen to peoples' points of view, but when they're not working you've got to speak up as well. I think social comment is very much part of what the Rolling Stones have always done."

Knighthoods and politics

Even so, songs about politics - and that knighthood - clearly worried his song-writing partner, Richards.

"I've no problem with the sentiments or anything like that," he said.
"But I didn't want it to become a distraction, a political storm in a tea cup. Very rarely do we touch on political subjects, and I think some of the best ways we've done it were with songs like Street Fighting Man, which were more oblique," he added.

"But on this one he wants to go face-to-face. That's fine. I'm waiting for the counter-attack!"

It was Richards' mistrust of anything to do with politics that kept the band away from the Live 8 concert this summer.

"I just thought the connection between Geldof and the Labour Party was... just too tight, and I don't see that debt reduction is going to feed the babes down there.

"Who is this gratifying and where were the Africans? Where was their say?"

He agreed that both "Sir" Bob Geldof and Sir Mick Jagger had tried to make him change his mind. "Oh yeah - all the Sirs had a bash - every one of them."

The relationship between the two, totally contrasting stars - Jagger and Richards - has always been part of the Rolling Stones' fascination. When asked about Richards' criticism, Jagger simply replied: "He's not a happy person."

The way these guys are going it's a pretty remote chance this is the last one [tour] they are bloody teenagers... I'm trying to keep up
Keith Richards on his fellow Stones

For his part, the apparently jovial Richards added: "Vive la difference. We're weird chemistry but somehow it works. I've known him since I was four - and other brothers' rows don't get in the press. The only time you hear about Mick and me is when we're having a spat."
Mellow Stones?

As for Richards' own, once-notorious lifestyle, he claims he has mellowed with the years.

Appearing on Newsnight 22 years ago, he talked of his years as a gun-carrying heroin addict. Now, he said: "I'm not that way anymore. I'm a family man. I'm a grandfather now - I'm really a benign sort of old chap."

The Rolling Stones are great survivors, but there is clearly the possibility that this could be their last massive-scale world tour.

Drummer Charlie Watts is the oldest Stone at 65, and has been treated for throat cancer.

He said: "I thought I was going to die." Though he has now been cleared he is concerned that "the horrible thing about having anything like that is you can never be 100% sure".

Jagger admitted: "This is a long tour. I don't know what happens after this tour."

Richards was far more upbeat. "The way these guys are going at the moment it's a pretty remote chance that this is the last one.

"They are bloody teenagers, the lot of them. I'm trying to keep up."

Robin Denselow's exclusive interview with The Rolling Stones will be broadcast on Newsnight on Friday, 2 September 2005, BBC Two at 2230 BST.

The Rolling Stones' new album - A Bigger Bang - is released on 5 September. Their world tour is expected to reach the UK next summer.


Story from BBC NEWS:
[news.bbc.co.uk]




Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Online Users

Guests: 1651
Record Number of Users: 206 on June 1, 2022 23:50
Record Number of Guests: 9627 on January 2, 2024 23:10

Previous page Next page First page IORR home