For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
That about covers it. They are a great band, and the last "recognizable" widely accepted great band to most. IMO they were never a "rock and roll" band like the Stones, but they do make great music. They've kind of been dogged by bad press and bad antics, which is both their fault and others. They are overrated, but they are also a great group of musicians that make good music. Maybe not in awhile, but they were and still are to a certain respect a great band. If you don't get swept into all the hype, its much easier to be a fan of them. You just like what you like and don't what you don't. I'd never call them the best of anything (live show, rock band), but they have made their mark in the last 35 years and to deny that is crazy.Quote
pepganzo
They are a great group. Maybe the last of the greatest bands ever and the best of the new bands. But their last good album was all that you cant leave behind published in 2001.
.. and I am not a fan of this band
Quote
RipThisBone
Read a few time these last weeks YouTwo are claiming the status of being The Greatest (Rock and Roll) Band On Earth in 2015...
I only got one CD (Achtung Baby) and a 12"inch vinyl (When Love Comes To Town) because KEITH RICHARDS is on the B-side.
U2 don't ROCK and they don't ROLL in my opinion.
Am I wrong thinking THE ROLLING STONES are LONELY AT THE TOP since 1962?
Quote
LeonidP
i was a huge U2 fan at one point ... but the Pop album ruined it for me, haven't been into them much since then.
Quote
keefriffhard4life
looks like i'm the only one who likes pop
Quote
keefriffhard4life
looks like i'm the only one who likes pop