Re: Wish List In your Dreams
Date: July 29, 2005 07:05
First, what does it mean for the RS - or any band - to "play the songs the fans want"? You and I likely have different setlist preferances, and surely they are different from 75% of the audience who want the hits. I recall a longtime (saw them in '65) so-called critic for the Boston Globe complaining the '94 show was 'slowed down' (funny I recall this - it annoyed me) by too many unfamiliar songs. Dinosaur Jr, the 'alt rock' band, are just doing numbers from thier first 3 (most famous) albums this year on their reunion tour. Nothing new. Pixies and other bands way younger than the RS frequently do something similar. Ever see the Ramones? (RIP) Or reunited Sex Pistols?
Second, as they have toured with greater frequency in the past decade (since '94 this is their fifth US tour)they have, as Thief notes, played new and/or rarely/never heard songs and covers (just since the Stripped tour an amazing array of numbers have been done, including ones I'd never have expected like 'You Got the Silver', 'Moonlight Mile', 'Can't You Hear Me Knocking', 'Some Girls', 'Thru & Thru', 'Love Train', 'Dance', etc, etc)
Third, I didn't pay 450$ for my seat - couldn't afford it, so I went for the $165 or whatever the 2nd price is. Most fans agree the high prices are self-defeating, keep away younger/poorer fans, and that is a worthy criticism imo
Fourth, of course they will play what they want & is fun for them, and what they believe works w/ audiences - a 'balance' of big hits, fazed cookies, & newer stuff - and we may quibble about the specifics. I never need to hear 'Honky Tonk' live again. Someone else may hate 'Thru & Thru', a highlight of the last tour for me. I don't know what the rs.com send-us-your-setlist is really about, tho my guess is the RS are interested in what songs fans want, even if it does not have much effect on the final setlists. Maybe they'll get a report from underlings, like politicians do with polls/contacts from voters.
Finally, I go because they have helped shape my life and values, and because they have given me a great deal of joy over the past 34 years since I bought my first Stones album, and they seem to work hard and play hard, and clearly want to maintain their legacy - that drive (besides the money) intrigues me. Yes, they can drive me up the f**king wall, w/stupid mortage ads, they can frustrate & sadden me when addictions which interfere with priorities, I can contort myself into a pretzel trying to decide what I think of every new album. But in the end, they are master musicians, cultural icons, living history, and I have had some of the greatest times of my life at the dozen or so shows I've attended since 1975, not to mention rock & roll's most extraordinary catalog.