Tell Me :  Talk
Talk about your favorite band. 

Previous page Next page First page IORR home

For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.

Goto Page: Previous12
Current Page: 2 of 2
Re: Article: U2 vs Stones
Date: May 25, 2015 01:02

Quote
GasLightStreet
Quote
DandelionPowderman
Quote
Koen
I was talking about when they were just starting and still in school. I'm sure over the years they became better at playing their instruments and pull that one off.

And there is no comma in Paint It Black.

There is a comma (not intentional, though) and GS is named Gimmie Shelter.

For the conservators...

Uhhhhh. No.


Try the LIB cover smiling smiley

Re: Article: U2 vs Stones
Posted by: pricepittsburgh ()
Date: May 25, 2015 08:39

Quote
stanlove
Quote
GasLightStreet
It's stupid. The only reason there is any comparison is because they both tend to tour about the same time.

It's as stupid as any comparison. U2 makes a lot of money touring. So do the Stones. U2 is still younger in their career and making new LPs, the Stones are older and not making new LPs.

WOO HOO.

WHATEVER.

OF course they are going to be compared. Are you kidding me? They are about the same size and constantly tour at about the same time. How could they not be compared.

I will never understand those people who think nothing should be compared. Let me guess apples and oranges.


lol I too used to hate the clichie "Apples and Oranges" but after all the comparisons of great acts, it does get to that point, as their is no right answer in subjective art. That being said, I would never place U2 in the same stratosphere as the Stones, Beatles, Zeppelin or The Who. however, I guess the next tier down has to have somebody and U2 certainly fits that bill. (That's a compliment not an insult)

Re: Article: U2 vs Stones
Posted by: GasLightStreet ()
Date: May 25, 2015 18:12

Quote
DandelionPowderman
Quote
GasLightStreet
Quote
DandelionPowderman
Quote
Koen
I was talking about when they were just starting and still in school. I'm sure over the years they became better at playing their instruments and pull that one off.

And there is no comma in Paint It Black.

There is a comma (not intentional, though) and GS is named Gimmie Shelter.

For the conservators...

Uhhhhh. No.


Try the LIB cover smiling smiley


Yes but apparently it's technically wrong for some reason!

Re: Article: U2 vs Stones
Posted by: stonehearted ()
Date: May 25, 2015 18:49

<<I too used to hate the clichie "Apples and Oranges" but after all the comparisons of great acts, it does get to that point, as their is no right answer in subjective art.>>

U2 and the Stones aren't even in the same food group.

Stones music is meat and potatoes, while U2, especially their output of the last 20 years, is music for vegetables.

Re: Article: U2 vs Stones
Posted by: Koen ()
Date: May 25, 2015 19:07

Quote
DandelionPowderman
Quote
GasLightStreet
Quote
DandelionPowderman
Quote
Koen
I was talking about when they were just starting and still in school. I'm sure over the years they became better at playing their instruments and pull that one off.

And there is no comma in Paint It Black.

There is a comma (not intentional, though) and GS is named Gimmie Shelter.

For the conservators...

Uhhhhh. No.


Try the LIB cover smiling smiley

Actually, it's Give Me Shelter spinning smiley sticking its tongue out

Re: Article: U2 vs Stones
Posted by: The Stones ()
Date: May 25, 2015 19:31

Great performances of newer songs:








Re: Article: U2 vs Stones
Posted by: stonehearted ()
Date: May 25, 2015 20:47

Even greater performance of older song (parody)




Re: Article: U2 vs Stones
Posted by: pt99 ()
Date: May 26, 2015 00:49

U2 beware good and are now boring

Re: Article: U2 vs Stones
Posted by: GasLightStreet ()
Date: May 26, 2015 01:23

Quote
potus43
U2 beware good and are now boring

Sense is FUBAR see all reason pirogue.

Re: Article: U2 vs Stones
Date: May 26, 2015 01:31

Quote
GasLightStreet
Quote
DandelionPowderman
Quote
GasLightStreet
Quote
DandelionPowderman
Quote
Koen
I was talking about when they were just starting and still in school. I'm sure over the years they became better at playing their instruments and pull that one off.

And there is no comma in Paint It Black.

There is a comma (not intentional, though) and GS is named Gimmie Shelter.

For the conservators...

Uhhhhh. No.


Try the LIB cover smiling smiley


Yes but apparently it's technically wrong for some reason!

British english is technically wrong? winking smiley

Re: Article: U2 vs Stones
Date: May 26, 2015 01:32

Quote
Koen
Quote
DandelionPowderman
Quote
GasLightStreet
Quote
DandelionPowderman
Quote
Koen
I was talking about when they were just starting and still in school. I'm sure over the years they became better at playing their instruments and pull that one off.

And there is no comma in Paint It Black.

There is a comma (not intentional, though) and GS is named Gimmie Shelter.

For the conservators...

Uhhhhh. No.


Try the LIB cover smiling smiley

Actually, it's Give Me Shelter spinning smiley sticking its tongue out

Give Me Some Shelter on the test pressing, right? smiling smiley

Re: Article: U2 vs Stones
Posted by: Nikkei ()
Date: May 26, 2015 01:34

Quote
GasLightStreet
Quote
potus43
U2 beware good and are now boring

Sense is FUBAR see all reason pirogue.

This man go witty you try to grasp?

Re: Article: U2 vs Stones
Posted by: GasLightStreet ()
Date: May 26, 2015 02:00

Saints won SB44.

Re: Article: U2 vs Stones
Posted by: treaclefingers ()
Date: May 26, 2015 08:36

Quote
Nikkei
Quote
GasLightStreet
Quote
potus43
U2 beware good and are now boring

Sense is FUBAR see all reason pirogue.

This man go witty you try to grasp?

The dingo ate my baby

Re: Article: U2 vs Stones
Posted by: buttons67 ()
Date: May 29, 2015 02:13

u2 made some great songs in the early days, as did the stones, when you compare them the stones are the best overall, but both had eras where they could easily beat each other for a while.

u2,s pre 1984 days were awesome and they were probably the best band on the planet at that time.

boy
october
war

were great albums.

they were great live too.

sad that today when u2 get mentioned the subject of bono being a prat overshadows the music.

Re: Article: U2 vs Stones
Posted by: treaclefingers ()
Date: May 29, 2015 03:55

Quote
buttons67
u2 made some great songs in the early days, as did the stones, when you compare them the stones are the best overall, but both had eras where they could easily beat each other for a while.

u2,s pre 1984 days were awesome and they were probably the best band on the planet at that time.

boy
october
war

were great albums.

they were great live too.

sad that today when u2 get mentioned the subject of bono being a prat overshadows the music.

bono is a double edged sword

Goto Page: Previous12
Current Page: 2 of 2


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Online Users

Guests: 1862
Record Number of Users: 206 on June 1, 2022 23:50
Record Number of Guests: 9627 on January 2, 2024 23:10

Previous page Next page First page IORR home