Re: Flip The Switch offered a frantic, farewell breakfast show
Date: June 30, 2005 12:06
What we have tried to do with Flip the Switch -and I have said this many times before- is try to emulate a bit of the sheer raw energy the Stones had in the 70's. It's not about technique, copying solo's or wearing a wig, but about knocking the audience of it's feet by the sheer energy of the music. Compared to the Stones, we had a much more simple job: we bought the same amps and guitars as they played, and we listened through 15 years of concerts to pick out the best versions of the songs we liked, and try to get to the essence of these versions. The Stones can never do this, as for them this would be looking back, while they are an original band and must look forward. Further, we had a big idea how we wanted to sound and how the show must look from a viewers pint of view. We feel we have succeeded in our approach, but we also feel we can't take it any further anymore. Our way of working also backfired to us sometimes. As we grew bigger and outgrew the standard pubs, some people started to feel we were arrogant. Well, sometimes as a musician you need to be arrogant to get your point through, so maybe there's a bit of truth in there. Second, we sounded much more like the Stones in the 70's than the current Stones, and to some people who only know the Stones from the big stadium shows of the 90's, we were just too loud and raw.
To me, the Stones from 1968 until 1986 are gods. Untouched by any other band ever on this planet. And they will stay that way, even though Richards doesn't play like he used to, Wood falls off the stage once in a while, and Wyman is gone. The Stones are the Stones. Period.
Mathijs