Tell Me :
Talk
And strangely all those rednecks now have their own reality TV shows and are all the rage..... peace
Agreed: basically my point too, in the post a couple above yours in this thread. I think it's great
of Mick to acknowledge and speak to Justin Bieber. Celebrity of the degree they both have is way
up in the rarified air. They may have more in common than you can imagine. And, again, it is good
of Mick to be generous in that way with him. He may also appreciate Bieber's moxie and style.
Who knows? Mick seems always to have been attracted to movers and shakers and people who are
on the entertainment cutting edge. He's not looking at Justin Bieber as a fan or consumer, but
someone who is, like him, an extremely popular performer...and a hot commodity.
- swiss
In my opinion he was just posing for a photo at a party, and it's as simple as that. And I don't know, but I feel like Justin Bieber's day has passed. Not that he can't sing and dance-he can- but I feel like his public stupidity has negated that. I don't agree with people who call him a female and things like that, because I think that's childish, but I really have seen no evidence up until this point of him being exceptionally bright. Also, unlike the Stones, he is not a great songwriter. As for his "style", I have a feeling Mick is not into drop crotch pants and sleeves full of tacky tattoos, but i suppose i could be wrong.And there is plenty of good music out there right now that I hope will be remembered over him.
Maybe so. I can't speak to anything about Justin Bieber. I've never seen or heard him
perform because his music seems to be geared toward pre-teens, and I'm not a kid and
don't have kids, and it's nothing that interests me. His public persona is also not interesting
to me. Nor his "style" or "fashion" sense. And I haven't watched closely enough to have an
opinion whether he is bright or interesting. Just saying, at least at this moment in time,
Mick and Justin Bieber have a lot more in common in terms of the circles they pass through
than most of us would have with Mick Jagger.
this is true
Yeah,
It's hilarious to see adults so offended who Mick Jagger is hanging out with..it's so... 8th grade.
I've never heard a JB song, but he is a phenomenon, or was a few years ago. He absolutely has more in common with Mick than any of us.
The kid achieved early fame and the road has been rough.. He seems to be learning the hard way how to handle that fame, and backlash..and has made mistakes. (Cos, you know, all of us would surely handle it with so much more grace..)
Maybe Mick recognizes that and feels for him.
Grow up people. You sound like acne-riddled pre-teens sneering at you're older sister's disco records.
Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 2014-10-08 08:37 by stupidguy2.
It's "your". But yeah, I agree.
I don't like Bieber's fashion sense or anything about him really. But complain about his appearance or whatever is indeed exactly what those "rednecks" did in 1963.
Please "JB" is and will always the almighty JAMES BROWN.
Justin Bieber is not JB, he's the 'lil @sshole, the 'lil c@nt, or any other disparaging names...
this made me howl!
Talk about your favorite band.
For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Re: Mick in Paris, October 2
Posted by:
SomeTorontoGirl
()
Date: October 7, 2014 01:05
I'm sensing "Been there, done that, seen it all. Nothing new here."
Re: Mick in Paris, October 2
Posted by:
Rip This
()
Date: October 7, 2014 01:28
Mick knows what he's doing...smart cookie that Mick.
Re: Mick in Paris, October 2
Posted by:
alieb
()
Date: October 7, 2014 03:16
this 1000 times over.Quote
Rockman
....it's about time Justin started ta shave .....
Re: Mick in Paris, October 2
Posted by:
swiss
()
Date: October 7, 2014 03:22
Actually---tho I love the dishy Lenny Kravitz---Lenny could be seen as odd man out in
this photo. Whether or not one is a fan of The Bieb, he's more in Mick's tax bracket and
realm of celebrity than Mr. Kravitz.
this photo. Whether or not one is a fan of The Bieb, he's more in Mick's tax bracket and
realm of celebrity than Mr. Kravitz.
Re: Mick in Paris, October 2
Posted by:
angee
()
Date: October 7, 2014 04:55
With Olga, he looks like he's saying, yeah, I'm a good boy, she's the one who's leaning on my shoulder.
~"Love is Strong"~
~"Love is Strong"~
Re: Mick in Paris, October 2
Posted by:
Chacho
()
Date: October 7, 2014 07:08
I'm a little disappointed in the hypocryrtical trashing of The Biebs on this thread.
It's kind of like the red-necks who no doubt trashed the Stones in 1963, when they were close to his age.
Luckily Mick, and the rest of The Stones have never been close minded like that, ever.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2014-10-07 07:11 by Chacho.
It's kind of like the red-necks who no doubt trashed the Stones in 1963, when they were close to his age.
Luckily Mick, and the rest of The Stones have never been close minded like that, ever.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2014-10-07 07:11 by Chacho.
Re: Mick in Paris, October 2
Posted by:
stonehearted
()
Date: October 7, 2014 07:13
<<It's kind of like the red-necks who no doubt trashed the Stones in 1963>>
Except that The Dwiebs is a lightweight ersatz "singer" whose "music" has the half-life of the average mayfly, whereas The Stones were defining the template of the modern rock band whose initial impact would still be remembered and talked about 50 years later.
It's kind of like... not the same thing at all, actually.
Except that The Dwiebs is a lightweight ersatz "singer" whose "music" has the half-life of the average mayfly, whereas The Stones were defining the template of the modern rock band whose initial impact would still be remembered and talked about 50 years later.
It's kind of like... not the same thing at all, actually.
Re: Mick in Paris, October 2
Posted by:
Naturalust
()
Date: October 7, 2014 07:19
Quote
stonehearted
<<It's kind of like the red-necks who no doubt trashed the Stones in 1963>>
Except that The Dwiebs is a lightweight ersatz "singer" whose "music" has the half-life of the average mayfly, whereas The Stones were defining the template of the modern rock band whose initial impact would still be remembered and talked about 50 years later.
It's kind of like... not the same thing at all, actually.
And strangely all those rednecks now have their own reality TV shows and are all the rage..... peace
Re: Mick in Paris, October 2
Posted by:
stonehearted
()
Date: October 7, 2014 09:30
<<And strangely all those rednecks now have their own reality TV shows and are all the rage>>
Sure, but I wasn't particularly addressing the rednecks comment, just the perceived trashing of the "singer" of whose name we do not type.
To address that part of the above post, by "rednecks" presumably you mean those backwoods folk of southern U.S. extraction. Those folks wouldn't have heard of them in 1963 anyway, and it wasn't just the rednecks putting down the Stones, but parents and grandparents in general. It was more of a generational resentment, especially considering the perceived threat they represented in light of ALO's marketing plan. I mean, I would hardly consider Dean Martin a redneck.
Sure, but I wasn't particularly addressing the rednecks comment, just the perceived trashing of the "singer" of whose name we do not type.
To address that part of the above post, by "rednecks" presumably you mean those backwoods folk of southern U.S. extraction. Those folks wouldn't have heard of them in 1963 anyway, and it wasn't just the rednecks putting down the Stones, but parents and grandparents in general. It was more of a generational resentment, especially considering the perceived threat they represented in light of ALO's marketing plan. I mean, I would hardly consider Dean Martin a redneck.
Re: Mick in Paris, October 2
Posted by:
swiss
()
Date: October 7, 2014 10:21
Quote
Chacho
I'm a little disappointed in the hypocryrtical trashing of The Biebs on this thread.
<snip>
Luckily Mick, and the rest of The Stones have never been close minded like that, ever.
Agreed: basically my point too, in the post a couple above yours in this thread. I think it's great
of Mick to acknowledge and speak to Justin Bieber. Celebrity of the degree they both have is way
up in the rarified air. They may have more in common than you can imagine. And, again, it is good
of Mick to be generous in that way with him. He may also appreciate Bieber's moxie and style.
Who knows? Mick seems always to have been attracted to movers and shakers and people who are
on the entertainment cutting edge. He's not looking at Justin Bieber as a fan or consumer, but
someone who is, like him, an extremely popular performer...and a hot commodity.
- swiss
Re: Mick in Paris, October 2
Posted by:
mr_dja
()
Date: October 7, 2014 16:17
Some of my best friends and family are rednecks. They are some of the greatest people I have ever met. Feeding the world and doing work that some of you seem to be too good for. Your use of this term makes your posts ignorant and insulting to many people who know far better the truth of the subject than you seem to.
No apologies necessary. Maybe in the future you'll check your ignorance before insulting a group of people you don't know or understand.
Peace,
Mr DJA
No apologies necessary. Maybe in the future you'll check your ignorance before insulting a group of people you don't know or understand.
Peace,
Mr DJA
Re: Mick in Paris, October 2
Posted by:
RoughJusticeOnYa
()
Date: October 7, 2014 16:21
Quote
mr_dja
Some of my best friends and family are rednecks. They are some of the greatest people I have ever met. Feeding the world and doing work that some of you seem to be too good for. Your use of this term makes your posts ignorant and insulting to many people who know far better the truth of the subject than you seem to.
No apologies necessary. Maybe in the future you'll check your ignorance before insulting a group of people you don't know or understand.
Peace,
Mr DJA
Re: Mick in Paris, October 2
Posted by:
alieb
()
Date: October 7, 2014 19:57
Quote
swissQuote
Chacho
I'm a little disappointed in the hypocryrtical trashing of The Biebs on this thread.
<snip>
Luckily Mick, and the rest of The Stones have never been close minded like that, ever.
Agreed: basically my point too, in the post a couple above yours in this thread. I think it's great
of Mick to acknowledge and speak to Justin Bieber. Celebrity of the degree they both have is way
up in the rarified air. They may have more in common than you can imagine. And, again, it is good
of Mick to be generous in that way with him. He may also appreciate Bieber's moxie and style.
Who knows? Mick seems always to have been attracted to movers and shakers and people who are
on the entertainment cutting edge. He's not looking at Justin Bieber as a fan or consumer, but
someone who is, like him, an extremely popular performer...and a hot commodity.
- swiss
In my opinion he was just posing for a photo at a party, and it's as simple as that. And I don't know, but I feel like Justin Bieber's day has passed. Not that he can't sing and dance-he can- but I feel like his public stupidity has negated that. I don't agree with people who call him a female and things like that, because I think that's childish, but I really have seen no evidence up until this point of him being exceptionally bright. Also, unlike the Stones, he is not a great songwriter. As for his "style", I have a feeling Mick is not into drop crotch pants and sleeves full of tacky tattoos, but i suppose i could be wrong.And there is plenty of good music out there right now that I hope will be remembered over him.
Re: Mick in Paris, October 2
Posted by:
swiss
()
Date: October 7, 2014 20:42
Quote
aliebQuote
swissQuote
Chacho
I'm a little disappointed in the hypocryrtical trashing of The Biebs on this thread.
<snip>
Luckily Mick, and the rest of The Stones have never been close minded like that, ever.
Agreed: basically my point too, in the post a couple above yours in this thread. I think it's great
of Mick to acknowledge and speak to Justin Bieber. Celebrity of the degree they both have is way
up in the rarified air. They may have more in common than you can imagine. And, again, it is good
of Mick to be generous in that way with him. He may also appreciate Bieber's moxie and style.
Who knows? Mick seems always to have been attracted to movers and shakers and people who are
on the entertainment cutting edge. He's not looking at Justin Bieber as a fan or consumer, but
someone who is, like him, an extremely popular performer...and a hot commodity.
- swiss
In my opinion he was just posing for a photo at a party, and it's as simple as that. And I don't know, but I feel like Justin Bieber's day has passed. Not that he can't sing and dance-he can- but I feel like his public stupidity has negated that. I don't agree with people who call him a female and things like that, because I think that's childish, but I really have seen no evidence up until this point of him being exceptionally bright. Also, unlike the Stones, he is not a great songwriter. As for his "style", I have a feeling Mick is not into drop crotch pants and sleeves full of tacky tattoos, but i suppose i could be wrong.And there is plenty of good music out there right now that I hope will be remembered over him.
Maybe so. I can't speak to anything about Justin Bieber. I've never seen or heard him
perform because his music seems to be geared toward pre-teens, and I'm not a kid and
don't have kids, and it's nothing that interests me. His public persona is also not interesting
to me. Nor his "style" or "fashion" sense. And I haven't watched closely enough to have an
opinion whether he is bright or interesting. Just saying, at least at this moment in time,
Mick and Justin Bieber have a lot more in common in terms of the circles they pass through
than most of us would have with Mick Jagger.
Re: Mick in Paris, October 2
Posted by:
DaveG
()
Date: October 7, 2014 21:33
Another nubile, skeletal model? Who needs 'em?? Not the least bit attractive to me.
Re: Mick in Paris, October 2
Posted by:
Bliss
()
Date: October 7, 2014 22:39
Looks like our Mick has become a Belieber! Wonder what happened at the after-party!
Re: Mick in Paris, October 2
Posted by:
dcba
()
Date: October 7, 2014 23:49
Can't say but Larry Flint bought the pix... 
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2014-10-07 23:50 by dcba.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2014-10-07 23:50 by dcba.
Re: Mick in Paris, October 2
Posted by:
tomcasagranda
()
Date: October 7, 2014 23:58
I've got a jacket like Mick's in my wardrobe.
Re: Mick in Paris, October 2
Posted by:
alieb
()
Date: October 8, 2014 07:01
Quote
swissQuote
aliebQuote
swissQuote
Chacho
I'm a little disappointed in the hypocryrtical trashing of The Biebs on this thread.
<snip>
Luckily Mick, and the rest of The Stones have never been close minded like that, ever.
Agreed: basically my point too, in the post a couple above yours in this thread. I think it's great
of Mick to acknowledge and speak to Justin Bieber. Celebrity of the degree they both have is way
up in the rarified air. They may have more in common than you can imagine. And, again, it is good
of Mick to be generous in that way with him. He may also appreciate Bieber's moxie and style.
Who knows? Mick seems always to have been attracted to movers and shakers and people who are
on the entertainment cutting edge. He's not looking at Justin Bieber as a fan or consumer, but
someone who is, like him, an extremely popular performer...and a hot commodity.
- swiss
In my opinion he was just posing for a photo at a party, and it's as simple as that. And I don't know, but I feel like Justin Bieber's day has passed. Not that he can't sing and dance-he can- but I feel like his public stupidity has negated that. I don't agree with people who call him a female and things like that, because I think that's childish, but I really have seen no evidence up until this point of him being exceptionally bright. Also, unlike the Stones, he is not a great songwriter. As for his "style", I have a feeling Mick is not into drop crotch pants and sleeves full of tacky tattoos, but i suppose i could be wrong.And there is plenty of good music out there right now that I hope will be remembered over him.
Maybe so. I can't speak to anything about Justin Bieber. I've never seen or heard him
perform because his music seems to be geared toward pre-teens, and I'm not a kid and
don't have kids, and it's nothing that interests me. His public persona is also not interesting
to me. Nor his "style" or "fashion" sense. And I haven't watched closely enough to have an
opinion whether he is bright or interesting. Just saying, at least at this moment in time,
Mick and Justin Bieber have a lot more in common in terms of the circles they pass through
than most of us would have with Mick Jagger.
this is true
Re: Mick in Paris, October 2
Posted by:
stupidguy2
()
Date: October 8, 2014 08:33
Quote
swissQuote
Chacho
I'm a little disappointed in the hypocryrtical trashing of The Biebs on this thread.
<snip>
Luckily Mick, and the rest of The Stones have never been close minded like that, ever.
Agreed: basically my point too, in the post a couple above yours in this thread. I think it's great
of Mick to acknowledge and speak to Justin Bieber. Celebrity of the degree they both have is way
up in the rarified air. They may have more in common than you can imagine. And, again, it is good
of Mick to be generous in that way with him. He may also appreciate Bieber's moxie and style.
Who knows? Mick seems always to have been attracted to movers and shakers and people who are
on the entertainment cutting edge. He's not looking at Justin Bieber as a fan or consumer, but
someone who is, like him, an extremely popular performer...and a hot commodity.
- swiss
Yeah,
It's hilarious to see adults so offended who Mick Jagger is hanging out with..it's so... 8th grade.
I've never heard a JB song, but he is a phenomenon, or was a few years ago. He absolutely has more in common with Mick than any of us.
The kid achieved early fame and the road has been rough.. He seems to be learning the hard way how to handle that fame, and backlash..and has made mistakes. (Cos, you know, all of us would surely handle it with so much more grace..)
Maybe Mick recognizes that and feels for him.
Grow up people. You sound like acne-riddled pre-teens sneering at you're older sister's disco records.
Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 2014-10-08 08:37 by stupidguy2.
Re: Mick in Paris, October 2
Posted by:
LieB
()
Date: October 8, 2014 10:42
Quote
stupidguy2
Yeah,
It's hilarious to see adults so offended who Mick Jagger is hanging out with..it's so... 8th grade.
I've never heard a JB song, but he is a phenomenon, or was a few years ago. He absolutely has more in common with Mick than any of us.
The kid achieved early fame and the road has been rough.. He seems to be learning the hard way how to handle that fame, and backlash..and has made mistakes. (Cos, you know, all of us would surely handle it with so much more grace..)
Maybe Mick recognizes that and feels for him.
Grow up people. You sound like acne-riddled pre-teens sneering at you're older sister's disco records.
It's "your". But yeah, I agree.
I don't like Bieber's fashion sense or anything about him really. But complain about his appearance or whatever is indeed exactly what those "rednecks" did in 1963.
Re: Mick in Paris, October 2
Posted by:
Rockman
()
Date: October 8, 2014 10:56
Ronnie's great mates with the One Direction guys ...
ROCKMAN
ROCKMAN
Re: Mick in Paris, October 2
Posted by:
alieb
()
Date: October 9, 2014 05:25
My grandmother must have been a "redneck" then because she was horrified by the Beatles...Quote
LieBQuote
stupidguy2
Yeah,
It's hilarious to see adults so offended who Mick Jagger is hanging out with..it's so... 8th grade.
I've never heard a JB song, but he is a phenomenon, or was a few years ago. He absolutely has more in common with Mick than any of us.
The kid achieved early fame and the road has been rough.. He seems to be learning the hard way how to handle that fame, and backlash..and has made mistakes. (Cos, you know, all of us would surely handle it with so much more grace..)
Maybe Mick recognizes that and feels for him.
Grow up people. You sound like acne-riddled pre-teens sneering at you're older sister's disco records.
It's "your". But yeah, I agree.
I don't like Bieber's fashion sense or anything about him really. But complain about his appearance or whatever is indeed exactly what those "rednecks" did in 1963.
Re: Mick in Paris, October 2
Posted by:
Title5Take1
()
Date: October 9, 2014 07:46
I stayed with friends once in the south of France when their son was away at a London boarding school. His mother told me, "He was at a party last week where two of the other guests were Mick Jagger and Julian Lennon." I thought, "That brat should've been me!"
Re: Mick in Paris, October 2
Posted by:
Rockman
()
Date: October 9, 2014 07:48
So you mean you look a lot like Julian Lennon ????...
ROCKMAN
ROCKMAN
Re: Mick in Paris, October 2
Posted by:
dcba
()
Date: October 9, 2014 12:26
Quote
stupidguy2
[
I've never heard a JB song
Please "JB" is and will always the almighty JAMES BROWN.
Justin Bieber is not JB, he's the 'lil @sshole, the 'lil c@nt, or any other disparaging names...
Re: Mick in Paris, October 2
Posted by:
swiss
()
Date: October 9, 2014 20:54
Quote
stupidguy2
You sound like acne-riddled pre-teens sneering at you're older sister's disco records.
this made me howl!Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Online Users
Guests:
1289
Record Number of Users:
206
on June 1, 2022 23:50
Record Number of Guests:
9627
on January 2, 2024 23:10