For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
slowhand
Not sure if this has been posted yet but here Shattered from the new Hampton release.
Shattered - Hampton
Quote
texas fan
It's the show that was historically referred to as the 11th -- both the audience recording of the show and the bootleg DVD. I don't know for sure, but I believe this date probably came from the original taper, Mike Millard, who was not known to mess up his dates, as far as I know. Doesn't mean it didn't happen, but that's how some people say it's the 11th.
Quote
TheGreek
just now i checked rollingstones.com and it said the date was july 12th not the 11th.so how do some people here say it is the july 11th
Quote
24FPS
I haven't been able to get a picture of the back of the box to see if it claims the 12th. I did notice there's no picture of Bill on the cover of LA 75, or Billy Preston, only the surviving quartet. It was hard to see, but I don't think Bill is on the cover of Hampton either.
Quote
Rollin92Quote
24FPS
I haven't been able to get a picture of the back of the box to see if it claims the 12th. I did notice there's no picture of Bill on the cover of LA 75, or Billy Preston, only the surviving quartet. It was hard to see, but I don't think Bill is on the cover of Hampton either.
Hell would have to freeze over twice before Wyman's image is used on any Stones merchandise or releases again.
Quote
DandelionPowderman
Isn't that hard to tell? We only see parts of their faces on the cover.
Quote
24FPSQuote
DandelionPowderman
Isn't that hard to tell? We only see parts of their faces on the cover.
I got a pretty good 900 size photo of LA 75 and the photos are top to bottom Charlie, Ron & Mick together, and Keith. It was harder to see the Hampton cover but there were a couple with Bill obscured by Keith.
Quote
treaclefingersQuote
24FPSQuote
DandelionPowderman
Isn't that hard to tell? We only see parts of their faces on the cover.
I got a pretty good 900 size photo of LA 75 and the photos are top to bottom Charlie, Ron & Mick together, and Keith. It was harder to see the Hampton cover but there were a couple with Bill obscured by Keith.
Literally or metaphorically?
Quote
24FPSQuote
treaclefingersQuote
24FPSQuote
DandelionPowderman
Isn't that hard to tell? We only see parts of their faces on the cover.
I got a pretty good 900 size photo of LA 75 and the photos are top to bottom Charlie, Ron & Mick together, and Keith. It was harder to see the Hampton cover but there were a couple with Bill obscured by Keith.
Literally or metaphorically?
Intrinsically.
Quote
24FPS
I like videotape. I think the image is purer and more lifelike,
Quote
24FPSQuote
DandelionPowderman
Isn't that hard to tell? We only see parts of their faces on the cover.
I got a pretty good 900 size photo of LA 75 and the photos are top to bottom Charlie, Ron & Mick together, and Keith. It was harder to see the Hampton cover but there were a couple with Bill obscured by Keith.
Quote
SipunculaQuote
24FPS
I like videotape. I think the image is purer and more lifelike,
Somehow I figured you for a film purist.
Sorry, I gave it at least a day. Couldn't let it go.
"Truth is stranger than fiction"
Quote
24FPS
I've contacted Eagle Rock on Facebook, and by e-mail, without reply, asking them to clarify that it's the 12th, and not the 11th, though we all know whatever date it is that it's roughly the same footage we've had for years. I was thinking that wouldn't it be funny if no one in the Stones camp is quite sure themselves? I should ask Bill.
Quote
24FPS
Maybe they're too invested now, with the boxes printed up and everything to change it. The Shidoobee thread got me thinking about ABKCO. They usually want to piggyback on the Stones current releases. I wonder if they have to share the same archive? I can't imagine what ABKCO would have left video wise, a few promo films, maybe some concert footage, maybe. ABKCO seems pretty played out by this time, excepting the BBC cuts, which isn't that exciting, and perhaps some Beggars & Let It Bleed bonus cuts.
Quote
alimenteQuote
24FPS
Maybe they're too invested now, with the boxes printed up and everything to change it. The Shidoobee thread got me thinking about ABKCO. They usually want to piggyback on the Stones current releases. I wonder if they have to share the same archive? I can't imagine what ABKCO would have left video wise, a few promo films, maybe some concert footage, maybe. ABKCO seems pretty played out by this time, excepting the BBC cuts, which isn't that exciting, and perhaps some Beggars & Let It Bleed bonus cuts.
ABKCO? Well, the MSG 1969 shows and Altamont filmed for the Gimme Shelter movie legally belong under their umbrella - a complete 1969 concert, even compiled from various shows, would excite me a bit more than Hampton 1981 or LA 1975, but that's probably just me. They could also compile a nice DVD from the surviving promos and TV appearances, and if they manage to dig out "holy grail"-type stuff like NME Pollwinners '68 or London Palladium 1967 for such a project, it would be very, very interesting indeed. A while ago, there were short video clips from Paris 1965 on Youtube, and there's hope that the complete show survived like the Kinks 1965 Olympia show that's widely available. Maybe even Paris 1967 that's rumoured to have been videotaped for TV broadcast, but never shown afaik.
It all depends on wether they were satisfied with the Charlie Is My Darling sales or not.
Audio-wise, there's more possibilities - live shows, radio broadcasts (Bill's Radio Luxembourg acetate!), BBC stuff, outtakes and last but not least unreleased stereo mixes of songs that up 'til now are only available in mono. However, a major obstacle could be that some of the stuff that ABKCO legally controls is not in their possession physically - tapes in the private possession of band members etc.
But, speaking of all these archive activities in general, they are probably 10 or even 20 years too late in the game to generate the sales the Stones and ABKCO were hoping for.